as voters in San Fran have learned the hard way as will the rest of AmericansLow bond...cause you know....enforcing the law is for sucks...
Voters waking up to radical California crime laws in wake of Bay Area looting (msn.com)
as voters in San Fran have learned the hard way as will the rest of AmericansLow bond...cause you know....enforcing the law is for sucks...
Trump committed sedition in trying to overturn the 2020 election. This is being investigated and needs to stay in the news. Otherwise, rightwingers will continue to move the country away from democracy and toward authoritarianism/fascism.Yes. Of course you’re wrong. The lefty media are doing what they can to keep his record, his past, his motive and state of mind out of the news. This is yet another covered up BLM act of wanton destructive violence.
Where’s the news at covering his extensive record? Where are they on delivering his social media?
Making sentencing more fair (and releasing wrongly convicted persons) is reasonable. Emptying the jails and eliminating cash bail leads to this:Wasn't criminal justice reform one of Trump's major accomplishments?
You need to look in the mirror when you say that.why lie?
Which has utterly NOTHING to do with what we were discussing. Hoo-boy, we got a live one here. The TDS kicked in and there went the topicTrump committed sedition in trying to overturn the 2020 election. This is being investigated and needs to stay in the news. Otherwise, rightwingers will continue to move the country away from democracy and toward authoritarianism/fascism.
when leftist lose the debate they post TrumpWhich has utterly NOTHING to do with what we were discussing. Hoo-boy, we got a live one here. The TDS kicked in and there went the topic
They are the same thing.Making sentencing more fair (and releasing wrongly convicted persons) is reasonable. Emptying the jails and eliminating cash bail leads to this:
Voters in Cali disagree with youThey are the same thing.
I know...everyone associated with him should claim executive privilege and refuse to give any info to investigators....as has another individual who committed acts resulting in the deaths of some folks. Of course, the people in Wisconsin were innocent and the people in DC were not, but this is about covering for the person responsible...right?Yes. Of course you’re wrong. The lefty media are doing what they can to keep his record, his past, his motive and state of mind out of the news. This is yet another covered up BLM act of wanton destructive violence.
Where’s the news at covering his extensive record? Where are they on delivering his social media?
He had a rather extensive social media presence. He posted BLM and anti-Semitism. Where is the reporting on it?I know...everyone associated with him should claim executive privilege and refuse to give any info to investigators....as has another individual who committed acts resulting in the deaths of some folks. Of course, the people in Wisconsin were innocent and the people in DC were not, but this is about covering for the person responsible...right?
Oh, and the media doesn't know much about the guy yet. You think they are covering for him, but how many reporters do you think they had in Waukesha?
got a link?He had a rather extensive social media presence. He posted BLM and anti-Semitism. Where is the reporting on it?
To morons like you they probably are.They are the same thing.
got a link?
1. No, they should have taught the thugs whom Rittenhouse killed to fear their victim (Rittenhouse) - then they might still be alive.So the people standing around when Rittenhouse shot three people should have taught Kyle to fear them...got it.
Too bad Aubery wasn't armed, eh?
There ought to be a law to arrest those judges, and put THEM on trial, as they are nearly as responsible for these deaths as the loon toon who drove the car.He actually has two pending cases...one from November 5th and another from July 2020.
I'd really like someone to ask the judges in those two cases what they were thinking when they let him out of jail for two violent incidents.
I'm encouraged that when I typed the word fascism, the first thing that came to your mind was Trump.Which has utterly NOTHING to do with what we were discussing. Hoo-boy, we got a live one here. The TDS kicked in and there went the topic
Not legally. Are you saying that what Brooks did would have been legal if someone asked or paid him to do it?He does if ask or paid to protect it
Brooks is topic
Not a chance. Makes you sound like an old crank who somehow relates Trump to world war 2 villains and the two have absolutely nothing to do with each other. So no, your word association, like your ability to stay on point, was an epic fail.I'm encouraged that when I typed the word fascism, the first thing that came to your mind was Trump.
Was Brooks protecting property?Not legally. Are you saying that what Brooks did would have been legal if someone asked or paid him to do it?
Eh, you posted Trump not just fascismI'm encouraged that when I typed the word fascism, the first thing that came to your mind was Trump.