New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Have you ever notice that we have legit 3rd party candidates that are to the left of Democratic candidates

Spamature

President
Yet, there are never legitimate candidates who are farther to the right than the Republican nominee.
When there is no one on your side of the spectrum, more extreme than your own nominee.
That right there tells you which of the two parties is led by radical extremists.
 

EatTheRich

President
There’s the Constitution Party and the Prohibition Party. Before Trump the Libertarians were also generally to the Republicans’ right.
 

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
Yet, there are never legitimate candidates who are farther to the right than the Republican nominee.
When there is no one on your side of the spectrum, more extreme than your own nominee.
That right there tells you which of the two parties is led by radical extremists.
Define legit.
 

RickWA

Senator
Define legit.
Don’t waste your time. Lefty has the introspective capacity of a dung beetle.

BTW: ya think lefty ever noticed that the websites and platforms of the Democratic Party and the Communist Party USA are nearly indistinguishable? Nah. And even if he did, he’d simply lie about it.

Cockeyed kooks top posting that they somehow think they are mainstream is one of the simple pleasures of PJ. “We can’t say who women or men are…we’re not sure what john to use…but get a load of those extremists over there!” It really is comical. :)
 

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
Cockeyed kooks top posting that they somehow think they are mainstream is one of the simple pleasures of PJ. “We can’t say who women or men are…we’re not sure what john to use…but get a load of those extremists over there!” It really is comical. :)
You said that so well. Take a bow. <clap>,<clap> :0)
 

EatTheRich

President
How are Libertarians to the right of Republicans when Libertarians claim to be socially liberal ?
They have a strong social conservative wing, a big overlap with the far right, and extreme positions on economic policy. Think of someone like Ron Paul.
 

Spamature

President
They have a strong social conservative wing, a big overlap with the far right, and extreme positions on economic policy. Think of someone like Ron Paul.
Ron Paul was against the Iraq war, and the war on terror, when that was seen as the position of the left, by the Republicans. After he dropped out in 2008 he endorsed both the Green Party candidate and Ralph Nader. I doubt if the GOP would see that as farther right than McCain who ran on being pro the Iraq war and even sang bomb, bomb, bomb...bomb, bomb Iran on the campaign trail.
 

Spamature

President
Yes, Progressives, but they run as Democrats

View attachment 70939

Especially the Gang
I've always said, Obama is the second greatest Republican President in our history.

Maybe someday the GOP will produce a decent Republican candidate.

But we are talking generations in the future, after the current crop of Republicans are dead, buried, and long forgotten.
 

Spamature

President
Don’t waste your time. Lefty has the introspective capacity of a dung beetle.

BTW: ya think lefty ever noticed that the websites and platforms of the Democratic Party and the Communist Party USA are nearly indistinguishable? Nah. And even if he did, he’d simply lie about it.

Cockeyed kooks top posting that they somehow think they are mainstream is one of the simple pleasures of PJ. “We can’t say who women or men are…we’re not sure what john to use…but get a load of those extremists over there!” It really is comical. :)
As if you Republican can talk about the platforms of others.

Yours was, literally, the teabagger messiah is our lord and savior.
Placating this man child is our only agenda for this country.


Also, the Republican experience itself, appears to be just another kind of Nazi symbol.

Far-Right Hate Symbols On Display At Capitol | WBEZ Chicago



Trump turns to neo-Nazi symbols to attract racist votes – People's World



Some in the GOP parrot far-right talk of a coming civil war | PBS News  Weekend


1656014434898.png

You might want to look into your own soul before you go commenting on others.
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
Ron Paul was against the Iraq war, and the war on terror, when that was seen as the position of the left, by the Republicans. After he dropped out in 2008 he endorsed both the Green Party candidate and Ralph Nader. I doubt if the GOP would see that as farther right than McCain who ran on being pro the Iraq war and even sang bomb, bomb, bomb...bomb, bomb Iran on the campaign trail.
Paul endorsed Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party in 2008.

He was in the isolationist-right tradition of politicians like Robert Taft.
 
Yet, there are never legitimate candidates who are farther to the right than the Republican nominee.
When there is no one on your side of the spectrum, more extreme than your own nominee.
That right there tells you which of the two parties is led by radical extremists.
Most 3rd party candidates wind up being single issue candidates. The environment. Anti immigration. Smashing capitalism. Placing their holy book higher than the constitution. Thats why they deserve zero serious consideration. Not becausw of their self described landing place on the political spectrum.
 

EatTheRich

President
Most 3rd party candidates wind up being single issue candidates. The environment. Anti immigration. Smashing capitalism. Placing their holy book higher than the constitution. Thats why they deserve zero serious consideration. Not becausw of their self described landing place on the political spectrum.
“Smashing capitalism” means not only addressing every issue of vital importance, but resolving many of them. I’d rather support a candidate who makes that their single issue than a typical Democratic or Republican candidate who evades, or takes the wrong side of, every major issue.
 

Spamature

President
Most 3rd party candidates wind up being single issue candidates. The environment. Anti immigration. Smashing capitalism. Placing their holy book higher than the constitution. Thats why they deserve zero serious consideration. Not becausw of their self described landing place on the political spectrum.
Yet people some people of a certain political persuasion believe that the candidate running on the single issue of, I want to be president because it makes me feel better about myself, couldn't lose.
 
Top