How are Libertarians to the right of Republicans when Libertarians claim to be socially liberal ?There’s the Constitution Party and the Prohibition Party. Before Trump the Libertarians were also generally to the Republicans’ right.
Define legit.Yet, there are never legitimate candidates who are farther to the right than the Republican nominee.
When there is no one on your side of the spectrum, more extreme than your own nominee.
That right there tells you which of the two parties is led by radical extremists.
Don’t waste your time. Lefty has the introspective capacity of a dung beetle.Define legit.
You said that so well. Take a bow. <clap>,<clap> :0)Cockeyed kooks top posting that they somehow think they are mainstream is one of the simple pleasures of PJ. “We can’t say who women or men are…we’re not sure what john to use…but get a load of those extremists over there!” It really is comical.
They have a strong social conservative wing, a big overlap with the far right, and extreme positions on economic policy. Think of someone like Ron Paul.How are Libertarians to the right of Republicans when Libertarians claim to be socially liberal ?
Ron Paul was against the Iraq war, and the war on terror, when that was seen as the position of the left, by the Republicans. After he dropped out in 2008 he endorsed both the Green Party candidate and Ralph Nader. I doubt if the GOP would see that as farther right than McCain who ran on being pro the Iraq war and even sang bomb, bomb, bomb...bomb, bomb Iran on the campaign trail.They have a strong social conservative wing, a big overlap with the far right, and extreme positions on economic policy. Think of someone like Ron Paul.
I've always said, Obama is the second greatest Republican President in our history.
As if you Republican can talk about the platforms of others.Don’t waste your time. Lefty has the introspective capacity of a dung beetle.
BTW: ya think lefty ever noticed that the websites and platforms of the Democratic Party and the Communist Party USA are nearly indistinguishable? Nah. And even if he did, he’d simply lie about it.
Cockeyed kooks top posting that they somehow think they are mainstream is one of the simple pleasures of PJ. “We can’t say who women or men are…we’re not sure what john to use…but get a load of those extremists over there!” It really is comical.
Paul endorsed Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party in 2008.Ron Paul was against the Iraq war, and the war on terror, when that was seen as the position of the left, by the Republicans. After he dropped out in 2008 he endorsed both the Green Party candidate and Ralph Nader. I doubt if the GOP would see that as farther right than McCain who ran on being pro the Iraq war and even sang bomb, bomb, bomb...bomb, bomb Iran on the campaign trail.
Most 3rd party candidates wind up being single issue candidates. The environment. Anti immigration. Smashing capitalism. Placing their holy book higher than the constitution. Thats why they deserve zero serious consideration. Not becausw of their self described landing place on the political spectrum.Yet, there are never legitimate candidates who are farther to the right than the Republican nominee.
When there is no one on your side of the spectrum, more extreme than your own nominee.
That right there tells you which of the two parties is led by radical extremists.
“Smashing capitalism” means not only addressing every issue of vital importance, but resolving many of them. I’d rather support a candidate who makes that their single issue than a typical Democratic or Republican candidate who evades, or takes the wrong side of, every major issue.Most 3rd party candidates wind up being single issue candidates. The environment. Anti immigration. Smashing capitalism. Placing their holy book higher than the constitution. Thats why they deserve zero serious consideration. Not becausw of their self described landing place on the political spectrum.
Yet people some people of a certain political persuasion believe that the candidate running on the single issue of, I want to be president because it makes me feel better about myself, couldn't lose.Most 3rd party candidates wind up being single issue candidates. The environment. Anti immigration. Smashing capitalism. Placing their holy book higher than the constitution. Thats why they deserve zero serious consideration. Not becausw of their self described landing place on the political spectrum.