So is tax fraud proven when people aren't allowed to view everyone else's tax returns?It's proven time and again when courts refuse to let the people see the ballots.
So is tax fraud proven when people aren't allowed to view everyone else's tax returns?It's proven time and again when courts refuse to let the people see the ballots.
Relentlessly stupid false equivalences are not your friend, Middler. Why does the left do that time and again? ;0)So is tax fraud proven when people aren't allowed to view everyone else's tax returns?
That's in the cities run by Democrats that have those post offices. Yes, shame on THEM indeed. The cities that can't count to save a dime also can't deliver the mail on time. Imagine that. ha ha"non-legislative"? Like extending dates to accommodate a post office that can't seem to move the mail in less than a week? Shame on them. So now could you show us evidence of subversion?
No, the whole system is a fraud until demonstrably secured and accessible to the citizens for audit and review post election.At least you've given up on the fraud bullshit...now you're just whining that too many people were allowed to vote because of extended early voting, expanded absentee balloting and allowing ballots postmarked by election day to be counted even if they arrive three days later.
The courts allowed Cyber Ninjas to view the ballots in AZ. Was that enough? A group in Wisconsin also audited the ballots...It's proven time and again when courts refuse to let the people see the ballots.
Yeah...it is the city that owns the post office there. You are aware that it was a Trump appointee that was dismantling sorting machines, denying overtime and laying people off, right? So why do you come up with such bizarre shit as blaming cities for the USPS?That's in the cities run by Democrats that have those post offices. Yes, shame on THEM indeed. The cities that can't count to save a dime also can't deliver the mail on time. Imagine that. ha ha
No, the whole system is a fraud until demonstrably secured and accessible to the citizens for audit and review post election.
It's the quality of the PEOPLE of the city!!! Same people can't count and can't deliver.Yeah...it is the city that owns the post office there.
Propaganda for all I or especially YOU know. Could have made business sense or not. But better the Post Office gain responsibility to validate its existence than to have unsecured "drop boxes" lining the streets of American.You are aware that it was a Trump appointee that was dismantling sorting machines, denying overtime and laying people off, right?
You are a one dimensional thinker. I explain it above.So why do you come up with such bizarre shit as blaming cities for the USPS?
Wow...none of your crap addressed the fact that the post office takes longer to deliver the mail than one or two days....even across the street. You think it is better to toss out ballots than it is to make sure all ballots are delivered and counted.It's the quality of the PEOPLE of the city!!! Same people can't count and can't deliver.
Not only that but people who choose to be government workers of all kinds don't measure up to the requisite needs of the job.
Propaganda for all I or especially YOU know. Could have made business sense or not. But better the Post Office gain responsibility to validate its existence than to have unsecured "drop boxes" lining the streets of American.
You are a one dimensional thinker. I explain it above.
No, If someone shows up on the Wednesday following voting day Tuesday, I really don't care to count their vote. Do you?Wow...none of your crap addressed the fact that the post office takes longer to deliver the mail than one or two days....even across the street. You think it is better to toss out ballots than it is to make sure all ballots are delivered and counted.
As you know, the president deliberately tried to delay the mailing of ballots in order to keep as many people from being able to vote as possible … because, as he put it, when more people have the opportunity to vote, the Democrats do better.No, If someone shows up on the Wednesday following voting day Tuesday, I really don't care to count their vote. Do you?
If the post office is so unreliable as you say maybe it is time to chuck the whole thing out and have FedEx pick up the slack for voting ballot collection. Or mail your ballot in earlier.
I don't give a shit why people vote or don't vote. I want a secure election period.As you know, the president deliberately tried to delay the mailing of ballots in order to keep as many people from being able to vote as possible … because, as he put it, when more people have the opportunity to vote, the Democrats do better.
And your definition of such is one that your side wins.I don't give a shit why people vote or don't vote. I want a secure election period.
ballots cast a day late? No. ballots cast the day befor and delivered the day after? Yes.No, If someone shows up on the Wednesday following voting day Tuesday, I really don't care to count their vote. Do you?
If the post office is so unreliable as you say maybe it is time to chuck the whole thing out and have FedEx pick up the slack for voting ballot collection. Or mail your ballot in earlier.
No, the side that votes in a secure fashion for all wins. If you can't get your lazy ass fvck ups to the polling place because they have the IQ and drive of turnips then that means probably they shouldn't vote. Stop being such incredible dickheads who can't vote unless someone sucks your [Unwelcome language removed] from your home all the way to polling place.And your definition of such is one that your side wins.
Hopefully most of those leaving so called anti abortion red states will move to swing states like Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona and Nevada who all respect a woman’s right to choose. Then hopefully most of the sanctamonius anti abortion people will move move out of those swing states into southern hell holes like Texas, South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, Tennessee and other right wing strongholds like Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Nebraska, Missouri, The Dakotas and Kentucky. That way, the GOP will not be able to ever get an Electoral Collee victory and appoint anymore religious nut right wing judges util they join the 21st century and start recognizing women’s bodily autonomy.... it will be left up to the states to pass their own state abortion laws. As is right and according to the constitution.
Should that happen Democrats will hopefully flee red states and head for blue states lickity split so they can lead their abortive lives uninterrupted. WE CAN SECURE THE RED STATES.
Eventually, the states with the best moral values by example will influence the blue states to become red states. The country, our experiment, will then begin a return to an upward lift of humanity.
Here's your leftist whine.
How the Supreme Court could overrule Roe v. Wade without overruling Roe v. Wade
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is an existential threat to Roe — even if the Court doesn’t use the words "Roe v. Wade is overruled."www.vox.com
Women in committed relationships with the means to bring up children in safe environments do not generally seek to have abortions. Mainly women who are alone and do not have the means to raise and support the child are the ones who choose to have their unwanted pregnancy terminated. This does not make those who are seeking abortions uglier or morally inferior to those who choose to have their child. It only suggests that most women who become pregnant do so as a result of their own choice and desire. Many women who have chosen to terminate their pregnancies are fine, moral women who made the difficult choice to terminate unwanted and unplanned pregnancies. Many women choose to have several children they can not support or care for and they keep having these children in order to receive welfare benefits.Funny, how literally the better looking women, the morally better women, vote for life and not death. You just can't trust women of a pro-abortive character. Keep them. Who wants them.
Adoption after birth control failure is an option. 50% of women seeking an abortion on any given day will have had AT LEAST one other abortion. Yours is a bullshit story that has led to 50 Million murders and the sale of differentiated baby tissue to the highest bidders.Women in committed relationships with the means to bring up children in safe environments do not generally seek to have abortions. Mainly women who are alone and do not have the means to raise and support the child are the ones who choose to have their unwanted pregnancy terminated. This does not make those who are seeking abortions uglier or morally inferior to those who choose to have their child. It only suggests that most women who become pregnant do so as a result of their own choice and desire. Many women who have chosen to terminate their pregnancies are fine, moral women who made the difficult choice to terminate unwanted and unplanned pregnancies. Many women choose to have several children they can not support or care for and they keep having these children in order to receive welfare benefits.
The sanctimonious is only you with your bogus woman's right to choose tired ass rhetoric. It is so I'm better than you sounding it is comically and unthinkingly sanctimonious. Actions have consequences and you can't murder your way out of them.Hopefully most of those leaving so called anti abortion red states will move to swing states like Florida, North Carolina, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona and Nevada who all respect a woman’s right to choose. Then hopefully most of the sanctamonius anti abortion people will move move out of those swing states into southern hell holes like Texas, South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, Tennessee and other right wing strongholds like Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, Nebraska, Missouri, The Dakotas and Kentucky. That way, the GOP will not be able to ever get an Electoral Collee victory and appoint anymore religious nut right wing judges util they join the 21st century and start recognizing women’s bodily autonomy.
And what of structural barriers like the Election being held on a work day and 6-hour lines in many polling places?No, the side that votes in a secure fashion for all wins. If you can't get your lazy ass fvck ups to the polling place because they have the IQ and drive of turnips then that means probably they shouldn't vote. Stop being such incredible dickheads who can't vote unless someone sucks your [Unwelcome language removed] from your home all the way to polling place.
1) Demand a national holiday for it.And what of structural barriers like the Election being held on a work day and 6-hour lines in many polling places?
1. I do. And I assume that you would strenuously oppose such a measure since it would make it easier for people to vote.1) Demand a national holiday for it.
2) Your elected, usually Democrat or Black Democrat, election official is put in place by the overwhelming Democrat voter base in these "under served" polling places. Why the fvck don't you hold these people liable for their failure. Why, can't you see the problem is of your own making!?!?
I'm so fed up with these circle jerk debates with you guys regarding elections its becoming easier to think you guys are actually not worthy citizens. YOu don't express American values. This is the shit complaints and ways of thinking of communists.