So, all in prison for same indictments/convictions will be Pardoned?Given the appeals court already tossed an identical case...I'd doubt it.
1. The question "Do you use illegal drugs" is the issue. Not background checks.Negative, Hunter is proof UBC's are useless as tits on boar hogs
Hunter indictments have done something republicans have been trying to do forever, got the Dem/Libs Supporting the 2nd Amendment!
1. So why in hell did you ask about background checks?1. The question "Do you use illegal drugs" is the issue. Not background checks.
2. Universal checks in Colorado have resulted in thousands of ex-felons attempting to buy guns and being denied. I just sold 10 rifles and two handguns...each and every buyer passed a background check. At least two of those buyers smoke pot...but checked "No". Do I think pot smokers are too dangerous to own guns? No. Did the appeals court agree? Yup.
If drug use should exclude someone from buying a gun then get your congress people to introduce a requirement for a drug test.
The question "Do you take drugs" has nothing at all to do with the second amendment.1. So why in hell did you ask about background checks?
2. Here's a quarter call someone that gives a damn of what Colorado has done.
Call your congress critters if that's what you want now that Hunter indictments served, leftist supporting 2nd Amendment is great