I beg you PJ righties for just 2 mins. Just listen to Liz Cheney and take her words to heart.

[Dawg]

Too bad he didn't send out that tweet before the mob breached the building.

Yes, yes it is and then you leftist wouldn't be crying for attention.

 

[middleview]

But such an action from a prosecutor would get them disbarred for doctoring evidence. That's corruption. If there are things in a tweet that a prosecutor is scared of and might find exculpatory then simply don't use the tweet. Don't doctor it to make it look more sinister.

The full text is what is in evidence. What is on display is what is relevant. It is the fact that Trump justified the riot that mattered. Telling people to go home does not change that in any way.

 

[middleview]

Yes, yes it is and then you leftist wouldn't be crying for attention.

Then there might not have been a riot...

 

[Dawg]

You should avoid interpreting my opinion when you don't seem able to actually know what it is.

The part of the tweet that was relevant to her point was Trump actually justifying the riot.

especially in the middle of the night!
So, why hasn't Garland indicted Trump?

 

[Dawg]

What disciplinary decision can the committee make?

I keep pointing out that they have not doctored anything and you keep right on pretending otherwise.

Proves it's a dog and pony show

 

[middleview]

especially in the middle of the night!
So, why hasn't Garland indicted Trump?

Stay tuned. The investigation hasn't finished.

 

[middleview]

Proves it's a dog and pony show

In your opinion.

 

[Dawg]

Then there might not have been a riot...

"might not"
IMO Pelosi ensured there would be a riot

 

[Dawg]

Stay tuned. The investigation hasn't finished.

So it's just another dog and pony show going on almost two damn years now.

Indict Trump and save taxpayers $Billions

 

[Dawg]

In your opinion.

It's an opinion fray that you take way to serious
seek mental medical help from your safe room

 

[middleview]

"might not"
IMO Pelosi ensured there would be a riot

Yeah, she should never have lied that the election was stolen, called for her supporters to come to DC for a wild rally on the day of the count of the electors and then told them to march on the capitol, fight like hell and stop the steal....

Oh...that wasn't Nancy?

 

[Dawg]

Yeah, she should never have lied that the election was stolen, called for her supporters to come to DC for a wild rally on the day of the count of the electors and then told them to march on the capitol, fight like hell and stop the steal....

Oh...that wasn't Nancy?

Nancy knew if she called for NG's she wouldn't get her riot
Nancy proves to be a pure evil bitch:

WATCH: Pelosi blasted after elbowing Mayra Flores's young daughter (msn.com)

and you support and defend her like a squid

 

[middleview]

Proves it's a dog and pony show

Actually proves it isn't a trial, any more than the 8 Benghazi hearings were.

 

[middleview]

Nancy knew if she called for NG's she wouldn't get her riot
Nancy proves to be a pure evil bitch:

WATCH: Pelosi blasted after elbowing Mayra Flores's young daughter (msn.com)

and you support and defend her like a squid

The House sergeant at arms reports to Pelosi. The Senate sergeant at arms reports to McConnell. Did he call for troops?

 

[Dawg]

Actually proves it isn't a trial, any more than the 8 Benghazi hearings were.

Ah, you're growing up

 

[middleview]

Ah, you're growing up

I haven't stopped growing...learning...improving.
But the real problem is that you aren't. You have to be the oldest third grader in your school.

 

[EatTheRich]

It wasn't "one general". It was Frank McKenzie, U.S. Central command and the premier commander of troops in Afghanistan. And he never said a "smoking gun". He said with regards to the evidence that "he hadn't seen any". When your top military leader says the story has no legs and the NY Times refuses to provide a source to refute that means the story is fake. She had no business demanding answers for a story that wasn't true. Her ONLY responsibility there, if anything, was to demand the NY Times reveal their sources.

He didn’t say he hadn’t seen any. He said he hadn’t seen “the evidence” that would prove the story once and for all. She did NOT have a responsibility to help Russia compromise American sources.

 

[JohnJohnson]

Telling people to go home does not change that in any way.

If it "does not matter" then why didn't she just use it? It's all of 2 seconds. We both know the answer so why do you keep lying like this?

 

[JohnJohnson]

He didn’t say he hadn’t seen any. He said he hadn’t seen “the evidence” that would prove the story once and for all. She did NOT have a responsibility to help Russia compromise American sources.

"I haven't seen it" in reference to the evidence means the story was fake. You can lie all you want. It was corrupt. Liz Cheney is corrupt.

 

[middleview]

If it "does not matter" then why didn't she just use it? It's all of 2 seconds. We both know the answer so why do you keep lying like this?

Yes, we both know, but you refuse to admit it.

Telling the rioters to go home was not relevant to Trump expressing justification for the violence.