So you think it's a coincidence that the jobs numbers are up and so's the Dow AFTER the "party of no" pulled the plug on Obamanomics?How about a discussion of the "proof positive of the failure of Obamanomics as indicated by a temporary drop in the Dow" thread?
Lukey, just to remind everybody else, YOU declared "Obamanomics is a failure" and used as "evidence" that the Dow dipped down to 9900 one day.So you think it's a coincidence that the jobs numbers are up and so's the Dow AFTER the "party of no" pulled the plug on Obamanomics?
"Just to remind everybody," GG is only citing one (of hundreds) of posts I made with "evidence" of the failure of Obamanomics. But, then, that's how he rolls...Lukey, just to remind everybody else, YOU declared "Obamanomics is a failure" and used as "evidence" that the Dow dipped down to 9900 one day.
That "proof" has magically vanished as of today, hasn't it???
that would be interesting observationAnd concentrate instead on the "Mitt is stiff" or "Repubs are unpopular" threads, you know they have to be running scared...
Or another 50 "Christie WILL be Veep" posts?I really want to respond to another 100 "Obamas stimulus failed" top posts.
OMG, not anther 50 Christie will be Veep posts.Or another 50 "Christie WILL be Veep" posts?
Yeah, you're right. The economics on that is pretty settled. So since you can't go there (that was kinda my point)...I really want to respond to another 100 "Obamas stimulus failed" top posts.
What are you - the "threadmarm?" I'm sure you consider all the "Mitt is stiff" posts to be "qualified" though, don't you?this has what to do with domestic policy or political news?
maybe most simply grow weary of debunking the same garbage over and over again, given the "frequently repeated lie" problem so rampant in the rightwinger ranks, e.g. the stimulus failed, etc.
Here's a bet....if we were to assign a "weight" to Lukey's "Christie Veep" posts of ...say....one milligram per post.....by this Summer it SHOULD way the same as Christie.OMG, not anther 50 Christie will be Veep posts.
Last night Bill O'Rielly said it looks like that's how it's shaping up. Get back to me the next time YOU post something that later shows up as the conventional wisdom. I've done it a number of times. See. I use my head here. You just react to other stuff without ever adding to the body of knowledge on anything. But, hey, you have four times my posts so you must have SOMETHING to say (but for the life of me, I can't remember a single one of them).Here's a bet....if we were to assign a "weight" to Lukey's "Christie Veep" posts of ...say....one milligram per post.....by this Summer it SHOULD way the same as Christie.
OMG, you still believe the stimulus was a failure, despite all facts and evidence to the contrary. By all means, start another top post, maybe Degsme will kick your ass again on the facts of the stimulus.Yeah, you're right. The economics on that is pretty settled. So since you can't go there (that was kinda my point)...
A) As opposed to Obama he's 100% correct.BTW, Lukey, Cicero would have considered "most Ameicans geniuses" if they elected Hillary.
His "new friends" are kind enough to not give their opinion of HER...and he reciprocates by trying not to mention her very much now.
Well, gee, Lukey....if BILL O'REILLY says so....must be true.Last night Bill O'Rielly said it looks like that's how it's shaping up. Get back to me the next time YOU post something that later shows up as the conventional wisdom. I've done it a number of times. See. I use my head here. You just react to other stuff without ever adding to the body of knowledge on anything. But, hey, you have four times my posts so you must have SOMETHING to say (but for the life of me, I can't remember a single one of them).
Lukey, it's part of the Molotov-von Ribbentrop pact that Cicero has made....that he promises not to praise Hillary, if you guys promise not to attack her and only use "Well compared to Obama..." lines.....so that neither of you has to give a real opinion of her and what policies she would have enacted as President and your support or opposition to them.A) As opposed to Obama he's 100% correct.
B) She has some of the Bill Clinton sheen on her so it's not that surprising that folks give her the benefit of the doubt.
C) I voted for McCain and I'm starting to think she'd have been better than HIM.