I noticed a few months back something about Timothy.

[resident_evil]

McVeigh said in court he did what he did because of the government's actions towards U.S. citizens at Ruby Ridge and Waco, TX.

You know what has NOT happened in the interim? There hasn't been another Ruby Ridge or Waco. Did the government learn its lesson? It is horrible to think that so many children died at McVeigh's hand to accomplish that. Doesn't seem worth the loss of innocent lives to save innocent lives.

Setting that aside...

Will the leftist censorship of the right on the internet lead to a learning experience for corporate America? The U.S. government? What form will it take if any? Will corporate America and/or the government learn their lesson? How much collateral damage will be suffered in the process.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Yes, Mcveigh's actions were in vain. The US doesn't negotiate with terrorists.

 

[resident_evil]

Yes, Mcveigh's actions were in vain. The US doesn't negotiate with terrorists.

And yet no more Waco's or Ridge's. Lesson learned?

P.S. Try and raise your intellectual capacity just a little bit would you? If it hurts, I'm sorry for asking.

 

[Jack4freedom]

McVeigh said in court he did what he did because of the government's actions towards U.S. citizens at Ruby Ridge and Waco, TX.

You know what has NOT happened in the interim? There hasn't been another Ruby Ridge or Waco. Did the government learn its lesson? It is horrible to think that so many children died at McVeigh's hand to accomplish that. Doesn't seem worth the loss of innocent lives to save innocent lives.

Setting that aside...

Will the leftist censorship of the right on the internet lead to a learning experience for corporate America? The U.S. government? What form will it take if any? Will corporate America and/or the government learn their lesson? How much collateral damage will be suffered in the process.

If the leftists tried to censor the right on the internet, they sure did a piss poor job of it. Rense, Infowars, Prisonplanet, Breitbart, Foxnews, and several other right wing nut blogs are thriving on the net.

 

[resident_evil]

If the leftists tried to censor the right on the internet, they sure did a piss poor job of it. Rense, Infowars, Prisonplanet, Breitbart, Foxnews, and several other right wing nut blogs are thriving on the net.

Denying the active and muscular censorship being practiced against conservative thought may be the exact problem seeking for a solution.

 

[Jack4freedom]

Denying the active and muscular censorship being practiced against conservative thought may be the exact problem seeking for a solution.

I don’t know about you but I have never had any problem finding extreme far left or extreme far right political or world views on the net. I have learned much from reading both sides of the spectrum as well as from conventional journalists.

 

[resident_evil]

I don’t know about you but I have never had any problem finding extreme far left or extreme far right political or world views on the net.

If you think their isn't a biased being exercised against conservative thought in the public square then maybe you haven't learned as much as you say you have.

... as well as from conventional journalists.

The last two conventional (and actual) journalists retired some years ago and the second just died.

 

[as seen on tv]

McVeigh said in court he did what he did because of the government's actions towards U.S. citizens at Ruby Ridge and Waco, TX.

You know what has NOT happened in the interim? There hasn't been another Ruby Ridge or Waco. Did the government learn its lesson? It is horrible to think that so many children died at McVeigh's hand to accomplish that. Doesn't seem worth the loss of innocent lives to save innocent lives.

Setting that aside...

Will the leftist censorship of the right on the internet lead to a learning experience for corporate America? The U.S. government? What form will it take if any? Will corporate America and/or the government learn their lesson? How much collateral damage will be suffered in the process.

No . . . We had the Las vegas massacre. The FBI still has found "no motive". Then they moved on to covering up their election interference.

 

[resident_evil]

No . . . We had the Las vegas massacre. The FBI still has found "no motive". Then they moved on to covering up their election interference.

I don't know how the Vegas incident relates to the Ruby Ridge or Waco incidences?

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

McVeigh said in court he did what he did because of the government's actions towards U.S. citizens at Ruby Ridge and Waco, TX.

You know what has NOT happened in the interim? There hasn't been another Ruby Ridge or Waco. Did the government learn its lesson? It is horrible to think that so many children died at McVeigh's hand to accomplish that. Doesn't seem worth the loss of innocent lives to save innocent lives.

Setting that aside...

Will the leftist censorship of the right on the internet lead to a learning experience for corporate America? The U.S. government? What form will it take if any? Will corporate America and/or the government learn their lesson? How much collateral damage will be suffered in the process.

Doesn't seem worth the loss of innocent lives to save innocent lives.

America; a military occupational presence in 70% of the countries on the planet, supporting 73% of the world's dictatorships apparently is; over and over and over again.

Yes, Mcveigh's actions were in vain. The US doesn't negotiate with terrorists.

Sure we do; the Saudis, neo-Nazis in Ukraine, al Qaida, al Nusra, the Taliban, Saddam, Osama, pay attention.

 

[resident_evil]

America; a military occupational presence in 70% of the countries on the planet, supporting 73% of the world's dictatorships apparently is; over and over and over again.

1) Do you know what "military occupational presence" means? Because if 2 dozen special forces somewhere in Africa qualify for "military occupational presence" or if troops in Europe, S. Korea, and Japan qualify as such then you need a new dictionary to better ground you in the English language. Don't source it from the internet. Buy a hardcover dictionary from the 80's or 90's.

2) Say something on topic for the thread. In this case will a McVeigh sized event happen given the partisan and censorial treatment of U.S. citizens by those who control the public square on the internet.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

1) Do you know what "military occupational presence" means? Because if 2 dozen special forces somewhere in Africa qualify for "military occupational presence" or if troops in Europe, S. Korea, and Japan qualify as such then you need a new dictionary to better ground you in the English language. Don't source it from the internet. Buy a hardcover dictionary from the 80's or 90's.

2) Say something on topic for the thread. In this case will a McVeigh sized event happen given the partisan and censorial treatment of U.S. citizens by those who control the public square on the internet.

1) We both know what it would be were it someone else here as we do damn near everywhere.

2) Already is in the form of internment camp apparatus infrastructure, mass population suerveillance, militarizing the police who are gunning down "certain" citizens in the streets with impunity as a "fwee" people clamor to be walled in.

 

[resident_evil]

1) We both know what it would be were it someone else here as we do damn near everywhere.

2) Already is in the form of internment camp apparatus infrastructure, mass population suerveillance, militarizing the police who are gunning down "certain" citizens in the streets with impunity as a "fwee" people clamor to be walled in.

1) The designation of military occupational forces has definitional requirements. So melodramatically tossing the term around doesn't make you sound serious. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_occupation

2) So you say "no" then. Thanks for the input on the matter.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

1) The designation of military occupational forces has definitional requirements. So melodramatically tossing the term around doesn't make you sound serious. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_occupation

2) So you say "no" then. Thanks for the input on the matter.

Of course, requirements established by the occupational force as deemed necessary.


If you don't know where the socialist funded military you support is, ya don't. Nay bother. The power structure relies upon that.

The constitution has requirements for going to war as well. Been wiping our national arse with the constitution since WWII in that regard.

You got a wiki link?

That's funny man, I like you after all.

 

[resident_evil]

Of course, requirements established by the occupational force as deemed necessary.


If you don't know where the socialist funded military you support is, ya don't. Nay bother. The power structure relies upon that.

The constitution has requirements for going to war as well. Been wiping our national arse with the constitution since WWII in that regard.

You got a wiki link?

That's funny man, I like you after all.

People can be hard to like. :0)

 

[Nutty Cortez]

If the leftists tried to censor the right on the internet, they sure did a piss poor job of it. Rense, Infowars, Prisonplanet, Breitbart, Foxnews, and several other right wing nut blogs are thriving on the net.

Uh Who was talking about censoring ? Nobody.

 

[Jack4freedom]

Uh Who was talking about censoring ? Nobody.

The person I responded to. Learn how to read.