I think so.I wonder how many missile launchers are in a Patriot Battery. Anyone here know?
PS. A battery is a single truck with 8 launchers, four missles each.
I think so.I wonder how many missile launchers are in a Patriot Battery. Anyone here know?
PS. A battery is a single truck with 8 launchers, four missles each.
The goal of the war is to make Ukraine cry "uncle." The idea that you can attack a populous country without killing any civilians is, well, pedantic. Is it "competent?" I think it's pretty effective, that's for sure:Really? You think it is a sign of military competence to throw cruise missiles at an apartment building? The evidence that Russian military leadership is incompetent is in events like the troops trapped on the river bank and destroyed by Ukrainian artillery.
Russian citizens fleeing the country rather than joining the fight.The goal of the war is to make Ukraine cry "uncle." The idea that you can attack a populous country without killing any civilians is, well, pedantic. Is it "competent?" I think it's pretty effective, that's for sure:
Photos Ukraine Destruction - Bing images
Peruse those photos and tell me again how Ukraine is "winning" the war!
Courting all out nuclear war isn't exactly a good look.That was the answer then, it remains the answer now. Whether US military, or an international peacekeeping force, Russia has been revealed to be a has been military force on par with the Iraqi military. The only threat that they can still muster is their nuclear arsenal for which we have an equal devastating counter
Nobody is using nukesCourting all out nuclear war isn't exactly a good look.
Not nearly as "glad" as you seem to be that the nation of Ukraine has been obliterated in support of the US' proxy war with Russia. Maybe we should have tried offering up a NATO contraction in return for assurance that Russia wouldn't attack Ukraine a year ago? Nah, it's only Ukrainians dying for our right to project western hegemony right up to the Kremlin's front door. The end justifies the means, am I right? I'd just like to know what the "end" is - it looks to me like it is nuclear destruction of the entire world.Russian citizens fleeing the country rather than joining the fight.
Global condemnation of Putin and Russia.
Russia recruiting from prisons.
Fourth Russian command change in a year.
Nah, clearly Russia is winning....aren't you glad?
Baloney. You're full of shit. Ukraine has fought for it's right to exist for centuries before you read some dumb shit in a cheap website.Not nearly as "glad" as you seem to be that the nation of Ukraine has been obliterated in support of the US' proxy war with Russia. Maybe we should have tried offering up a NATO contraction in return for assurance that Russia wouldn't attack Ukraine a year ago? Nah, it's only Ukrainians dying for our right to project western hegemony right up to the Kremlin's front door. The end justifies the means, am I right? I'd just like to know what the "end" is - it looks to me like it is nuclear destruction of the entire world.
I don't consider this:Baloney. You're full of shit. Ukraine has fought for it's right to exist for centuries before you read some dumb shit in a cheap website.
My family has paid for it dearly and it wasn't for hegemony
Nobody is leading Ukraine to the slaughter other than by Russia's attempts to do soI don't consider this:
Photos Ukraine Destruction - Bing images
"Existence."
I'm not criticizing Ukraine for fighting its best fight to remain free - I am criticizing the neocons for leading Ukraine to the slaughter.
Yeah...Putin's invasion was our fault...I don't consider this:
Photos Ukraine Destruction - Bing images
"Existence."
I'm not criticizing Ukraine for fighting its best fight to remain free - I am criticizing the neocons for leading Ukraine to the slaughter.
Apparently Russia believes taking and holding territory is less useful in winning a war than depleting your enemy's fighting forces through attrition. If Ukraine is losing 8-10 fighters for every Russian they eliminate, whichever side suffers the greatest losses will lose the war.Why is that something for consideration? It isn't. Putin has committed a war crime by sending his army into Ukraine. He is not eliminating nazis by destroying apartment blocks
How many Nazis did Putin exterminate in Mariupol?He's not eliminating nazis. What he's doing is blowing up innocent civilians indiscriminately
What infrastructure currently exists that would facilitat4 a US victory over Russia inside Ukraine?well, yes... be careful, you'll attract the attention of the b.b.bb.ut ww3 armageddon crowd....
i agree. a US action would end this in a blink.
Putin is killing civilians....old people, children. Your cheering him and the murder of Ukrainians is pretty disgusting.Apparently Russia believes taking and holding territory is less useful in winning a war than depleting your enemy's fighting forces through attrition. If Ukraine is losing 8-10 fighters for every Russian they eliminate, whichever side suffers the greatest losses will lose the war.
None. Other than many that he sent...How many Nazis did Putin exterminate in Mariupol?
Apparently Russia believes taking and holding territory is less useful in winning a war than depleting your enemy's fighting forces through attrition. If Ukraine is losing 8-10 fighters for every Russian they eliminate, whichever side suffers the greatest losses will lose the war.
There's a segment of Russian TV pundits lauding and praising the destruction in dnipro etcMSN
www.msn.com
Still you have to wonder about a guy on Russian TV telling the truth, that Putin's "special military operation" has failed in every aspect.There's a segment of Russian TV pundits lauding and praising the destruction in dnipro etc
Give me a few minutes and I'll find you the clip.
Sick and evil people's
He'll be gone soonStill you have to wonder about a guy on Russian TV telling the truth, that Putin's "special military operation" has failed in every aspect.