If Jan 6 was an insurrection...
- Thread starter reason10
- Start date
Addy
Rebuild With Biden!
It was an attempted insurrection...
_____________________________________
Insurrection
A rising or rebellion of citizens against their government, usually manifested by acts of violence.
Under federal law, it is a crime to incite, assist, or engage in such conduct against the United States.
snip-------
5.-3. That whenever it may be necessary, in the judgment of the president, to use the military force hereby directed to be called forth, the president shall forthwith, by proclamation, command such insurgents to disperse, and retire peaceably to their respective abodes, within a limited time.
Insurrection legal definition of Insurrection (thefreedictionary.com)
_____________________________________
Insurrection
A rising or rebellion of citizens against their government, usually manifested by acts of violence.
Under federal law, it is a crime to incite, assist, or engage in such conduct against the United States.
snip-------
5.-3. That whenever it may be necessary, in the judgment of the president, to use the military force hereby directed to be called forth, the president shall forthwith, by proclamation, command such insurgents to disperse, and retire peaceably to their respective abodes, within a limited time.
Insurrection legal definition of Insurrection (thefreedictionary.com)
reason10
Governor
The insurrection took place on Election Night, when the vote counting was stopped and Joe was illegally seated as president.
The people involved in that belong in prison.
Because the Insurrectionists are really just pussies. They wear combat tactical gear and carry weapons to look tough and talk and act tough, but they're just pussies with small penises. Your kind of people.
1. Counting stopped after all ballots had been counted. Trump lost.
2. Trump had his day in court, arguing the election had been rife with fraud. He lost every single case they filed....all the way up to the Supreme Court. Here is what one republican judge had to say....
One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence.
At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Latest posts
-
When Trump found guilty in the Stormy Daniels case.- Latest: protectionist
-
