ObamacareForever
Senator
Senate candidate/domestic abuser/all around scumbag makes a video threatening gun violence against RINO's.Don't know. Why don't you give me the lowdown
Red-flag this nutter and take away his guns.
Senate candidate/domestic abuser/all around scumbag makes a video threatening gun violence against RINO's.Don't know. Why don't you give me the lowdown
That does seem odd. I would be for prohibiting his access to guns until it is determined that he is mentally stable. Good luck with itSenate candidate/domestic abuser/all around scumbag makes a video threatening gun violence against RINO's.
Red-flag this nutter and take away his guns.
I already answered that rhetorical question above.Yes. Are we agreed that guns that are sitting inert are not of their own accord slaughtering people?
I'm not understanding your line of reasoning. There is no door flung open to an increase in gun Carnage conducted by inert guns.I already answered that rhetorical question above.
Meanwhile, the illegally stacked SCOTUS flung the door open today to much more gun carnage.
Mental stability is sometimes a transitory thing. It's there for a moment, then it's gone, then it's back, then it's gone.That does seem odd. I would be for prohibiting his access to guns until it is determined that he is mentally stable. Good luck with it
Of course not. The increased gun carnage will be caused by the people using them for the purpose for which they were designed - slaughtering people.I'm not understanding your line of reasoning. There is no door flung open to an increase in gun Carnage conducted by inert guns.
That's great. Such people with transitory freakouts need not have gunsMental stability is sometimes a transitory thing. It's there for a moment, then it's gone, then it's back, then it's gone.
Yes. So I'm still not sure that we agreed. We should work on addressing those people who cause gun Carnage... yes?Of course not. The increased gun carnage will be caused by the people using them for the purpose for which they were designed - slaughtering people.
Of course. Along with controlling the sale of guns so there is less gun carnage. And I’m sure you agree that we usually cannot identify in advance those who cause gun carnage. We find out afterward, when people have been slaughtered.Yes. So I'm still not sure that we agreed. We should work on addressing those people who cause gun Carnage... yes?
That's why it's such a complicated thing. At its core however I'm glad that we are agreed, in that guns themselves are entirely inanimate and it's the people that we need to address. So we'll have to figure out a way to restrict the crazy evil people among us from their access to guns. I'm all for that. But I'm not for a demonizing inanimate things that are by their nature unable to do a thing without external influence.Of course. Along with controlling the sale of guns so there is less gun carnage. And I’m sure you agree that we usually cannot identify in advance those who cause gun carnage. We find out afterward, when people have been slaughtered.
We agree as to the crazy people. We seem to disagree when it comes to gun control measures. We don’t make products designed to kill people freely available simply because they are inanimate. Except for guns.That's why it's such a complicated thing. At its core however I'm glad that we are agreed, in that guns themselves are entirely inanimate and it's the people that we need to address. So we'll have to figure out a way to restrict the crazy evil people among us from their access to guns. I'm all for that. But I'm not for a demonizing inanimate things that are by their nature unable to do a thing without external influence.
You need to lessen the damage crazy people can do, but denying the 2nd amendment to crazy people.That's why it's such a complicated thing. At its core however I'm glad that we are agreed, in that guns themselves are entirely inanimate and it's the people that we need to address. So we'll have to figure out a way to restrict the crazy evil people among us from their access to guns. I'm all for that. But I'm not for a demonizing inanimate things that are by their nature unable to do a thing without external influence.
No, I think again you are a misunderstanding. I think at times deliberately so because you seem to want to cast me in with the GOP over and over again. I am entirely for gun control measures, in other words screening, background checks, restrictions for crazy people and so on. But I see there at the end you went back to your falsehoods, namely pretending the guns are freely available. Guns are not freely available. Perhaps the validation and background check processes are a little too LAX and can be stricter. But they're not simply freely available. That is falseWe agree as to the crazy people. We seem to disagree when it comes to gun control measures. We don’t make products designed to kill people freely available simply because they are inanimate. Except for guns.
Yes. We need to double down our efforts to identify crazy people and restrict their access to guns.You need to lessen the damage crazy people can do, but denying the 2nd amendment to crazy people.
You should resist the urge to “rewrite” what I say.No, I think again you are a misunderstanding. I think at times deliberately so because you seem to want to cast me in with the GOP over and over again. I am entirely for gun control measures, in other words screening, background checks, restrictions for crazy people and so on. But I see there at the end you went back to your falsehoods, namely pretending the guns are freely available. Guns are not freely available. Perhaps the validation and background check processes are a little too LAX and can be stricter. But they're not simply freely available. That is false
Pretty sure crazy people have 2nd amendment rights too.Yes. We need to double down our efforts to identify crazy people and restrict their access to guns.
How about people who are not crazy, but who are apt to use guns to slaughter people?Yes. We need to double down our efforts to identify crazy people and restrict their access to guns.
"Buy on rumor. Sell on fact". This is a well known investment aphorism. But i doubt its from buffet.Time will tell..
I'm not rewriting what you say I'm trying to decipher it. Struggling I'll admit cuz you're really hard to understand the times. I have always been on the side of intensive control of the sale of guns. Have a good oneYou should resist the urge to “rewrite” what I say.
On the plus side, I’m glad to see you on the side of those who want to more intensively control the sale of guns.
This has become circular again. What do we do about it?Pretty sure crazy people have 2nd amendment rights too.