Let's see. You looked at Reuters to find evidence of bias at a competitor. Why not THE VIEW while you're at it.Reuters is less credible than Fox?
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biases sources.
- Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion ormediabiasfactcheck.com
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
- Overall, we rate Fox News right biased based on editorial positions that align with the right and Questionable due to the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, the use of poor sources, and numerous false claims and failed fact checks. Straight news reporting from beat reporters is generally fact-based and accurate, which earns them a Mixed factual rating.QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or nomediabiasfactcheck.com
As I pointed out to you...GPS data for cell phones is not nearly as accurate as D'Souza claimed.
Did he prove one single fraudulent ballot? No.
Did he identify one single left wing group paying people to harvest ballots? No.
Did he show video of one person making more than one drop at a ballot box? No.
Those are facts and they don't give a shit about your opinions.
Fox pisses off EVERYBODY because it gives BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE equal time and access. Only a fuckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkking moron doesn't see that.
You don't have facts. You never did. And facts don't care about your feelings.