New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

In PA, Fetterman is afraid to debate Dr. Oz

reason10

Governor
Reuters is less credible than Fox?

LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biases sources.
  • Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Fox News right biased based on editorial positions that align with the right and Questionable due to the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, the use of poor sources, and numerous false claims and failed fact checks. Straight news reporting from beat reporters is generally fact-based and accurate, which earns them a Mixed factual rating.


As I pointed out to you...GPS data for cell phones is not nearly as accurate as D'Souza claimed.

Did he prove one single fraudulent ballot? No.

Did he identify one single left wing group paying people to harvest ballots? No.

Did he show video of one person making more than one drop at a ballot box? No.

Those are facts and they don't give a shit about your opinions.
Let's see. You looked at Reuters to find evidence of bias at a competitor. Why not THE VIEW while you're at it.

Fox pisses off EVERYBODY because it gives BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE equal time and access. Only a fuckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkking moron doesn't see that.

You don't have facts. You never did. And facts don't care about your feelings.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Fetterman is being made to defend his past comments...and he's running from them as fast as a 53 year old obese man who recently suffered a stroke can:

"And it’s not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations," the then-presidential candidate continued.

Fetterman — who was the mayor of Braddock, Pennsylvania, at the time — defended Obama’s remarks in the press as the now-former president was engaged in his contentious primary election against then-New York Senator Hillary Clinton.

"It is not patronizing, it is not condescending, it is not elitism," Fetterman said to local press. "We need hope and we need a plan and we need someone who is not part of the system in Washington."

The Pennsylvania Democrat’s campaign has been sailing through rough waters recently, with the candidate enduring a stroke and his team walking back a statement from last year appearing to call to "free" every convicted second-degree murderer in the Keystone State.

The campaign said Fetterman does not support releasing all prisoners serving life without parole for second-degree murder and that he believes there are individuals convicted of life without parole who deserve to remain in prison.


John Fetterman defended Obama’s comments calling small-town Pennsylvanians ‘bitter’ (msn.com)

You can run Johnny, but you can't hide...
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Let's see. You looked at Reuters to find evidence of bias at a competitor. Why not THE VIEW while you're at it.

Fox pisses off EVERYBODY because it gives BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE equal time and access. Only a fuckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkking moron doesn't see that.

You don't have facts. You never did. And facts don't care about your feelings.
I gave you the link to who evaluated Fox and Reuters. Seems you just don't have the attention to detail that would allow you to post facts at all.

So how many Fox employees have worked for Trump's administration? How many Reuters employees have gone to work for democrats?
 
Top