Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Who the f*ck said it was an "illegal" contribution? This isn't about the donation at all - you are just using that as a "red herring" here to try and find some cover. You won't.You think your link about an accusation from 2018 means anything? Read the article and tell me what the charge actually is. Nowhere does it allege improper donations.
Smith claims the foundation received a “$25M financial advantage dishonestly obtained by deception”
Also included in the Smith materials are evidence he believes shows “corrupt October 2006 backdating of false tender advertisements purporting to advertise the availability of a $15 million contract to provide HIV/AIDS services in Papua New Guinea on behalf of the Australian government after an agreement was already in place to pay the Clinton Foundation and/or associates.”
What does that mean? backdating of false tender advertisements?
A third complaint concerns what Smith describes as “the $10 million financial advantage dishonestly obtained by deception between April 1, 2008, and Sept. 25, 2008, at Washington, D.C., New York, New York, and Canberra Australia involving an MOU between the Australian government, the “Clinton Climate Initiative,” and the purported “Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute Inc.”
And what came of this...four years later? There was never an indictment from either the US or Australian side. Looks like it went nowhere...even with Durham's help.
This was about the fact that Downer was a Clinton crony - and has been since 2006. So the idea that he just "happened to bump into" Papadopoulos and get the info Mifsud (an FBI asset, by the way) had conveniently seeded strains credulity.
Answer a simple question - why is it Trump's "Russian collusion" simply could not be substantiated without wall to wall Clinton friends and associates?