Inquisitor
Council Member
When I was younger and richer, I met a fair share of women who were married or in a relationship who were eager to have a little liaison.
Yeah, technically it's a sin, but honestly, if she's deseperate enough to be stuck in a marriage to an archaic, ugly old primate, wifebeater, fat [Unwelcome language removed], hapless little doormat, and whatnot, I'm thinking God might be inclinded to look the other way if she were to have a little affair with a younger, more intelligent, and more aesthetically inclinded sort of fellow.
As far as evolutionary psychology is concerned, it's only men at the very bottom of the evolutionary hierarchy or pecking order who have to resort to rape, "marital" or otherwise, do to want of any consensual female attention, it's not like any naturally higher status or evolutionarily superior male would ever have to resort to rape or demanding sex, let alone becoming an ugly, obese little porn or anime addict; men at the "top", so to speak, whether a suave, contemporary ladies' man like Rousseau, or an ancient patriarch like King Solomon obviously didn't "need sex" much as the comparatively sex-starved, ugly, or sexually desperate male; neither did St. Paul for that matter, and ironically actually advised against it.
Maybe eventually, these archaic, ugly, creepy old primates will be replaced by more efficient robots our automation which don't smell half as bad and aren't liable toward rapish or domestic abusing tendencies, then women can have an automated robot to do all the work and provision, while being free and liberated enough to pursue the more attractive and evolutionarily superior male specimens.
As it already is, she more or less has to settle for a Neanderthal to earn the money, and seek out a more attractive male for the romance, so why not just automate the archaic Neanderthal and evolutionarily ineffectual primate, and allow women's liberation and superior sexual freedom be achieved?
Realizing what the average woman was desperate enough to stay married to, let alone allow within 10 feet of her without a can of mace or pepper spray handy really made me have sympathy for enlightened feminism and no-fault divorce laws, bleh...
Only an archaic 'socialist' idiot, or one who is entirely anti-capitalism, or wants all women confined to the kitchen or whatnot, would have much of any reason to be in said opposition toward, right? My view, seems to be entirely meritocratic, eh?
Yeah, technically it's a sin, but honestly, if she's deseperate enough to be stuck in a marriage to an archaic, ugly old primate, wifebeater, fat [Unwelcome language removed], hapless little doormat, and whatnot, I'm thinking God might be inclinded to look the other way if she were to have a little affair with a younger, more intelligent, and more aesthetically inclinded sort of fellow.
As far as evolutionary psychology is concerned, it's only men at the very bottom of the evolutionary hierarchy or pecking order who have to resort to rape, "marital" or otherwise, do to want of any consensual female attention, it's not like any naturally higher status or evolutionarily superior male would ever have to resort to rape or demanding sex, let alone becoming an ugly, obese little porn or anime addict; men at the "top", so to speak, whether a suave, contemporary ladies' man like Rousseau, or an ancient patriarch like King Solomon obviously didn't "need sex" much as the comparatively sex-starved, ugly, or sexually desperate male; neither did St. Paul for that matter, and ironically actually advised against it.
Maybe eventually, these archaic, ugly, creepy old primates will be replaced by more efficient robots our automation which don't smell half as bad and aren't liable toward rapish or domestic abusing tendencies, then women can have an automated robot to do all the work and provision, while being free and liberated enough to pursue the more attractive and evolutionarily superior male specimens.
As it already is, she more or less has to settle for a Neanderthal to earn the money, and seek out a more attractive male for the romance, so why not just automate the archaic Neanderthal and evolutionarily ineffectual primate, and allow women's liberation and superior sexual freedom be achieved?
Realizing what the average woman was desperate enough to stay married to, let alone allow within 10 feet of her without a can of mace or pepper spray handy really made me have sympathy for enlightened feminism and no-fault divorce laws, bleh...
Only an archaic 'socialist' idiot, or one who is entirely anti-capitalism, or wants all women confined to the kitchen or whatnot, would have much of any reason to be in said opposition toward, right? My view, seems to be entirely meritocratic, eh?