New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Is infidelity a sin if she's married to a loser?

Inquisitor

Council Member
When I was younger and richer, I met a fair share of women who were married or in a relationship who were eager to have a little liaison.

Yeah, technically it's a sin, but honestly, if she's deseperate enough to be stuck in a marriage to an archaic, ugly old primate, wifebeater, fat [Unwelcome language removed], hapless little doormat, and whatnot, I'm thinking God might be inclinded to look the other way if she were to have a little affair with a younger, more intelligent, and more aesthetically inclinded sort of fellow.

As far as evolutionary psychology is concerned, it's only men at the very bottom of the evolutionary hierarchy or pecking order who have to resort to rape, "marital" or otherwise, do to want of any consensual female attention, it's not like any naturally higher status or evolutionarily superior male would ever have to resort to rape or demanding sex, let alone becoming an ugly, obese little porn or anime addict; men at the "top", so to speak, whether a suave, contemporary ladies' man like Rousseau, or an ancient patriarch like King Solomon obviously didn't "need sex" much as the comparatively sex-starved, ugly, or sexually desperate male; neither did St. Paul for that matter, and ironically actually advised against it.

Maybe eventually, these archaic, ugly, creepy old primates will be replaced by more efficient robots our automation which don't smell half as bad and aren't liable toward rapish or domestic abusing tendencies, then women can have an automated robot to do all the work and provision, while being free and liberated enough to pursue the more attractive and evolutionarily superior male specimens.

As it already is, she more or less has to settle for a Neanderthal to earn the money, and seek out a more attractive male for the romance, so why not just automate the archaic Neanderthal and evolutionarily ineffectual primate, and allow women's liberation and superior sexual freedom be achieved?

Realizing what the average woman was desperate enough to stay married to, let alone allow within 10 feet of her without a can of mace or pepper spray handy really made me have sympathy for enlightened feminism and no-fault divorce laws, bleh...

Only an archaic 'socialist' idiot, or one who is entirely anti-capitalism, or wants all women confined to the kitchen or whatnot, would have much of any reason to be in said opposition toward, right? My view, seems to be entirely meritocratic, eh?
 
When I was younger and richer, I met a fair share of women who were married or in a relationship who were eager to have a little liaison.

Yeah, technically it's a sin, but honestly, if she's deseperate enough to be stuck in a marriage to an archaic, ugly old primate, wifebeater, fat [Unwelcome language removed], hapless little doormat, and whatnot, I'm thinking God might be inclinded to look the other way if she were to have a little affair with a younger, more intelligent, and more aesthetically inclinded sort of fellow.

As far as evolutionary psychology is concerned, it's only men at the very bottom of the evolutionary hierarchy or pecking order who have to resort to rape, "marital" or otherwise, do to want of any consensual female attention, it's not like any naturally higher status or evolutionarily superior male would ever have to resort to rape or demanding sex, let alone becoming an ugly, obese little porn or anime addict; men at the "top", so to speak, whether a suave, contemporary ladies' man like Rousseau, or an ancient patriarch like King Solomon obviously didn't "need sex" much as the comparatively sex-starved, ugly, or sexually desperate male; neither did St. Paul for that matter, and ironically actually advised against it.

Maybe eventually, these archaic, ugly, creepy old primates will be replaced by more efficient robots our automation which don't smell half as bad and aren't liable toward rapish or domestic abusing tendencies, then women can have an automated robot to do all the work and provision, while being free and liberated enough to pursue the more attractive and evolutionarily superior male specimens.

As it already is, she more or less has to settle for a Neanderthal to earn the money, and seek out a more attractive male for the romance, so why not just automate the archaic Neanderthal and evolutionarily ineffectual primate, and allow women's liberation and superior sexual freedom be achieved?

Realizing what the average woman was desperate enough to stay married to, let alone allow within 10 feet of her without a can of mace or pepper spray handy really made me have sympathy for enlightened feminism and no-fault divorce laws, bleh...

Only an archaic 'socialist' idiot, or one who is entirely anti-capitalism, or wants all women confined to the kitchen or whatnot, would have much of any reason to be in said opposition toward, right? My view, seems to be entirely meritocratic, eh?
IMO, Lying, and cheating are immoral, regardless of you lie to and who you cheat on.
 

Inquisitor

Council Member
IMO, Lying, and cheating are immoral, regardless of you lie to and who you cheat on.
Yeah, ideally she'd just divorce and dump that archaic primate and ugly loser prior to having her clandestine affair, much as an offense as it would be to the uneducated hicks and ugly, anti-intellectual primates still living in a decidedly archaic day and age, that's why I'm definitely happy about no-fault divorce laws as of the 21st century.

Most likely though, many of them will just cheat, if not with a certain guy, then with a different set of guy or guys, given all of the trouble that said divorce laws and ramifications are. Often, she'll deny cheating with the "first guy" specifically, but not openly or overtly deny "cheating period", which more savvy people, including many savvy women themselves would assert is more or less a tacit admission that even if she wasn't having an affair with the guy who is or was the first suspect, it was still someone else entirely, maybe even the TV set and the hunks on it, lol
 
Top