New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Is there anyone here who openly identifies as a Fascist, National Socialist etc?

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
"Is there anyone here who openly identifies as a Fascist, National Socialist etc?"


Yes, me.
Sorry i didn't see the thread until now.
Welcome @Nomenclature -- though i notice you haven't posted since the day you posted this thread. :-(
Two questions, Emily:
1. Is that why you don't believe the holocaust happened?
2. Why are you a Fascist?
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
Two questions, Emily:
1. Is that why you don't believe the holocaust happened?
2. Why are you a Fascist?
1. My belief is that the official, "canonical" historical narrative of "The Holocaust" is inaccurate in a number of respects. The reason why I believe that is the weight of the evidence.
2. I'm a National Socialist. Modern, American National Socialism shares some elements with classical Fascism and Neo-Fascism but, imo, it's not entirely accurate to label it "fascist" sans qualification. Why I embraced NS philosophy is a long-ish tale; I'd be happy to share it but this thread isn't about me. Two short and incomplete reasons are
- that NS is a beautiful philosophy centered around humanity's place in Nature, with an upstanding lifestyle built around that philosophy,
- and that NS stood and stands against everything that's been driving the world to Hell, with a workable social/economic/political model to institute in place of the corrupted, failed one we've got.

Thank you for asking.
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
1. My belief is that the official, "canonical" historical narrative of "The Holocaust" is inaccurate in a number of respects. The reason why I believe that is the weight of the evidence.
2. I'm a National Socialist. Modern, American National Socialism shares some elements with classical Fascism and Neo-Fascism but, imo, it's not entirely accurate to label it "fascist" sans qualification. Why I embraced NS philosophy is a long-ish tale; I'd be happy to share it but this thread isn't about me. Two short and incomplete reasons are
- that NS is a beautiful philosophy centered around humanity's place in Nature, with an upstanding lifestyle built around that philosophy,
- and that NS stood and stands against everything that's been driving the world to Hell, with a workable social/economic/political model to institute in place of the corrupted, failed one we've got.

Thank you for asking.
My contention is that the evidence for the holocaust is so overwhelming that no one in their right mind can rightfully deny it. By denying it, you lump yourself in with some of the foulest scumbags on the planet, Kluxers, Skinheads, White Supremacists; Anti Semites and just general whackos.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
My contention is that the evidence for the holocaust is so overwhelming that no one in their right mind can rightfully deny it. By denying it, you lump yourself in with some of the foulest scumbags on the planet, Kluxers, Skinheads, White Supremacists; Anti Semites and just general whackos.
i feel that the 1st point above makes clear the difference between what I, and others who might properly be called "truthers," believe re: "The Holocaust" and what is commonly considered to be the belief of those called "Holocaust deniers." We do not "deny" that something happened; we question the accepted motives, methods, and numbers, and outcomes.

In contrast to yours, my contention is that the evidence against the veracity of the accepted historical narrative of "The Holocaust" is so overwhelming that no one in their right mind who has seen that evidence could honestly accept that narrative.

We've strayed from the topic of this thread. If you'd like to discuss "Holocaust" history, please start a thread on it and invite me to join the discussion. I'll be happy to.
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
i feel that the 1st point above makes clear the difference between what I, and others who might properly be called "truthers," believe re: "The Holocaust" and what is commonly considered to be the belief of those called "Holocaust deniers." We do not "deny" that something happened; we question the accepted motives, methods, and numbers, and outcomes.

In contrast to yours, my contention is that the evidence against the veracity of the accepted historical narrative of "The Holocaust" is so overwhelming that no one in their right mind who has seen that evidence could honestly accept that narrative.

We've strayed from the topic of this thread. If you'd like to discuss "Holocaust" history, please start a thread on it and invite me to join the discussion. I'll be happy to.
I don't believe there is anything to discuss about the holocaust.
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
As expected.
(This ain't my first rodeo.)
Be well.
I respect your right to have an opinion on this but I do not respect your opinion. I don't want to get into a conversation with you because I will get mad and maybe say something I wish I had not said. I'd rather stay friends with you.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
I respect your right to have an opinion on this but I do not respect your opinion. I don't want to get into a conversation with you because I will get mad and maybe say something I wish I had not said. I'd rather stay friends with you.
You're a gentleman, Sir.
 
I don't believe there is anything to discuss about the holocaust.
IEDish, Not Yiddish

On most issues, there is a third interpretation that is squelched by the designated opinionists and never discussed. Superficially diversified mind control provides us with limited thought patterns and mindsets.

On this issue, the Jews were cowards who should have been obligated to organize an all-out armed revolt, which would have also frustrated the Nazis from ever engaging in aggression against other countries. Meekly submitting to the roundups of their people is a self-destructive characteristic that deserves absolutely no sympathy. If we were allowed to think in a manly manner, that should have been the great and only lesson of the Holocaust, which, after all, was originally applied only to dumb passive cattle. But the ruling class has a self-interest in not making cowardice a crime. It is the root of all political evil.
 

JackDallas

Senator
Supporting Member
IEDish, Not Yiddish

On most issues, there is a third interpretation that is squelched by the designated opinionists and never discussed. Superficially diversified mind control provides us with limited thought patterns and mindsets.

On this issue, the Jews were cowards who should have been obligated to organize an all-out armed revolt, which would have also frustrated the Nazis from ever engaging in aggression against other countries. Meekly submitting to the roundups of their people is a self-destructive characteristic that deserves absolutely no sympathy. If we were allowed to think in a manly manner, that should have been the great and only lesson of the Holocaust, which, after all, was originally applied only to dumb passive cattle. But the ruling class has a self-interest in not making cowardice a crime. It is the root of all political evil.
The Jews didn't really have the opportunity to organize the kind of resistance you speak of. The Germans had disarmed the populace early on after Hitler had seized power. His propaganda program had whipped up a false narrative against the Jews so there was very little sympathy for them among the German people.
When they did fight back, as in Warsaw, they were slaughtered, being no match for the German Army.
Every crime committed against the Jews (before the death camps) was legal under German law. Hitler's government changed or created laws that permitted German citizens to take the homes and property of Jews.
By the time they are aware of just how powerless they were to defend themselves, it was too late to fight back.
 

EatTheRich

President
IEDish, Not Yiddish

On most issues, there is a third interpretation that is squelched by the designated opinionists and never discussed. Superficially diversified mind control provides us with limited thought patterns and mindsets.

On this issue, the Jews were cowards who should have been obligated to organize an all-out armed revolt, which would have also frustrated the Nazis from ever engaging in aggression against other countries. Meekly submitting to the roundups of their people is a self-destructive characteristic that deserves absolutely no sympathy. If we were allowed to think in a manly manner, that should have been the great and only lesson of the Holocaust, which, after all, was originally applied only to dumb passive cattle. But the ruling class has a self-interest in not making cowardice a crime. It is the root of all political evil.
The Jews waged several revolts, shutting down 2 of 6 death camps.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
IEDish, Not Yiddish

On most issues, there is a third interpretation that is squelched by the designated opinionists and never discussed. Superficially diversified mind control provides us with limited thought patterns and mindsets.

On this issue, the Jews were cowards who should have been obligated to organize an all-out armed revolt, which would have also frustrated the Nazis from ever engaging in aggression against other countries. Meekly submitting to the roundups of their people is a self-destructive characteristic that deserves absolutely no sympathy. If we were allowed to think in a manly manner, that should have been the great and only lesson of the Holocaust, which, after all, was originally applied only to dumb passive cattle. But the ruling class has a self-interest in not making cowardice a crime. It is the root of all political evil.
The Jews didn't really have the opportunity to organize the kind of resistance you speak of. The Germans had disarmed the populace early on after Hitler had seized power. His propaganda program had whipped up a false narrative against the Jews so there was very little sympathy for them among the German people.
When they did fight back, as in Warsaw, they were slaughtered, being no match for the German Army.
Every crime committed against the Jews (before the death camps) was legal under German law. Hitler's government changed or created laws that permitted German citizens to take the homes and property of Jews.
By the time they are aware of just how powerless they were to defend themselves, it was too late to fight back.
The Jews waged several revolts, shutting down 2 of 6 death camps.
Suggestion: Research beyond the wartime & post-war propaganda of the victors.
 
The Jews didn't really have the opportunity to organize the kind of resistance you speak of. The Germans had disarmed the populace early on after Hitler had seized power. His propaganda program had whipped up a false narrative against the Jews so there was very little sympathy for them among the German people.
When they did fight back, as in Warsaw, they were slaughtered, being no match for the German Army.
Every crime committed against the Jews (before the death camps) was legal under German law. Hitler's government changed or created laws that permitted German citizens to take the homes and property of Jews.
By the time they are aware of just how powerless they were to defend themselves, it was too late to fight back.
Yellow Ghosts


The European Jews had plenty of time to mobilize before it was too late. What do our gunowners claim will happen if the government even starts to confiscate their weapons?

Why would they need sympathy from the Christian Germans before they could fight back? How are any of the excuses you recite logical; they all come out of King Cowardice propaganda. Early on, even in the 1920s, the Jews knew what was coming if the Nazis became any more popular than a fringe group. Denial is a deadly escape.

They tried to emigrate. They tried to hide. They pretended that the German military was weak and wouldn't last very long once England and France stood up against it. America will fall under tyranny also if these excuses become acceptable whenever our own freedom becomes threatened.

They came under the spell of Freud's contempt for manliness, everybody a weak and trapped Mama's Boy. Kafka's gutless escapist confusion and Einstein's weird science took away a rational response to a clear, present, and growing threat to their very existence. The Marxist alternative, though violent, would have also pitted Jew against Jew. Their cultural heroes were the Pied Pipers setting the cadence on the march to the gas chambers.
 
My contention is that the evidence for the holocaust is so overwhelming that no one in their right mind can rightfully deny it. By denying it, you lump yourself in with some of the foulest scumbags on the planet, Kluxers, Skinheads, White Supremacists; Anti Semites and just general whackos.
Jack there is absolutely no evidence that the so called Holocaust ever happened - there is, however, a lot a lot of propaganda to say that it did but it is just that; fabrication and propaganda.
 
The Jews didn't really have the opportunity to organize the kind of resistance you speak of. The Germans had disarmed the populace early on after Hitler had seized power. His propaganda program had whipped up a false narrative against the Jews so there was very little sympathy for them among the German people.
When they did fight back, as in Warsaw, they were slaughtered, being no match for the German Army.
Every crime committed against the Jews (before the death camps) was legal under German law. Hitler's government changed or created laws that permitted German citizens to take the homes and property of Jews.
By the time they are aware of just how powerless they were to defend themselves, it was too late to fight back.
The Jews declared war on Germany first, long before Britain and France did - but it was their betrayal of Germany in WWI and then their profiting from it after Versailles which turned Germans against them. Germany had taken Jews fleeing Russia wit open arms but were seen to betray their hosts at Versaille.

But .... no Jew was detained as 'an enemy of the state' until the French and British ( at Roosevelt's instiation, declared war.

The rich Jews had already left Germany before war was declared with their wealth.
 
The Jews waged several revolts, shutting down 2 of 6 death camps.
The so called Death Camps were so called because as war intensified engines and such were being built underground -it was hot and they worked long hours, food was rationed and many did not see the light of day again BUT Jews don't work, it was not they working underground --- then rumors grew and the death in the Camp was exaggerated - purposefully by Zionist propagandists for their Israel = 6 million had to die by fire of course.
 
Top