Well
Biden misfire: Majority turns against ‘assault weapons’ ban (msn.com)
Does majority still rule?
Biden misfire: Majority turns against ‘assault weapons’ ban (msn.com)
Does majority still rule?
It's not the gun.
- Thread starter PhilFish
- Start date
So why have universal background check because...drunk drivers cause car accidents? You're a genius!
Is that because there are not enough guns in circulation?
Well, instead of turning your GUN in to be destroyed YOU SOLD it to someone to keep it in Circulation and should stop being a GUN Hypocrite by posting such bullshit as posted in your reply.
Proving GUNs in circulation doesn't worry you as much of greed of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Yes, I sold it to a guy who passed a background check to be sure he was eligible to legally own it.
Feel free to find a post of mine that suggests confiscating and destroying guns.
So you ensured it was left in circulation while whining of guns in circulation, hypocrite #1
Evidently MONEY more important to you than GUNs in circulation
GUNs save more lives than they take
Off-duty female cop shoots robber dead after he tries to grab her gun (msn.com)
Now laugh like a grade school kid
Last edited:
Spamature
President
We are talking about intentional killings, not accidents.
Less than 600 people a year us a car as a weapon in a homicide.
When someone drives drunk it's intentional killings
Google lied to you, professor
Did the majority elect Trump in 2016?
Spamature
President
So how many drunk driving deaths vs gun deaths
According to MADD, there are 29 DUI-related fatalities every day in the US Statistics | MADD ). That's 10,585 per year.
Firearm homicides: Number of deaths: 20,958
No, genius Google lied to you.
Guns overtake car crashes as the leading cause of death
also:
Accurately Comparing Death Rates from Motor Vehicle and Firearm Use
Last edited:
How many of the 20,958 are suicides by Gun_______________
Did link have any damn thiing to do with 2020 election or your obsession to fvck every thread with Trump?
You brought up majority rule. Did you forget?
I asked a question. You can't seem to answer it.
That guns can save lives does not mean that universal background checks to prevent ex-cons from getting guns is a bad idea.
Criminals don't buy their GUNs at GUN stores, how are you going to be back-ground checks on them?
Now your GUN may be in criminal circulation since you sold it instead of turning it into LEO's.......again Money means more to you than you're whining of GUNs in circulation.
NO ONE buys at gun stores w/out back-ground checks
1. The number of people arrested at Colorado gun stores shows you are wrong.
2. Private sales should require a background check.
3. As long as the guy who bought the gun requires any potential buyer to also get a background check, it won't end up owned by a criminal, someone undergoing psychiatric care or someone with a restraining order against them.
I asked you if more guns were in circulation would help prevent crime. You lied and said I was complaining about guns in circulation.
1. If arrested they evidently didn't buy a gun!
2. Say's you that sold your gun and now have no idea where or who owns it,
3. "As long" now you don't have the ability to ensure that or can prove that.
Don't whine of guns in circulation and sell a gun to be in circulation
Hypocrisy as leftist get
BTW: appears this punk didn't get a back-ground check
Georgia teen steals gun from Dunkin’ customer, shoots him to death in the parking lot: reports (msn.com)
and blue cities have many just like him, no wonder top 5 dirty cities are ran by Dem Mayors
MSN
www.msn.com
shame punk didn't grab her gun
Last edited:
1. They tried and failed the background check.1. If arrested they evidently didn't buy a gun!
2. Say's you that sold your gun and now have no idea where or who owns it,
3. "As long" now you don't have the ability to ensure that or can prove that.
Don't whine of guns in circulation and sell a gun to be in circulation
Hypocrisy as leftist get
BTW: appears this punk didn't get a back-ground check
Georgia teen steals gun from Dunkin’ customer, shoots him to death in the parking lot: reports (msn.com)
and blue cities have many just like him, no wonder top 5 dirty cities are ran by Dem Mayors
MSN
www.msn.com
2. I sold it to a legal buyer, based on passing a background check.
3. Were you thinking that having owned that gun at one point, I should follow the buyer around to make sure he sells is to another legal buyer? Sounds like a pretty stupid suggestion to me. The guy who bought my gun had no problem meeting me at the gun shop and having them run a background check. Why would he risk breaking the law to sell the gun to someone else?
