New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

It's time to call Trump/GOP fascists

Zam-Zam

Senator
Maybe slapping derogatory names on groups of people just to alleviate some self-esteem issues is not a great idea? Just a thought....


I have never understood name calling. I really don't mean to be funny or humorous here, as some people pass off their offensive statements by saying it was meant as humor...

I guess I just never learned to call names, thank goodness, and have never understood the custom. Name calling is offensive to me. It is like an alien-outer-space-foreign language...does not compute at all. When my children picked it up at school, they got a good dose of cod liver oil. There are just better ways, at least to my way of living and thinking. Name calling speaks to a lack of thought of the situation and a lack of concern of how the situation will resolve itself.

The study of psychology teaches us that when someone resorts to name calling, it usually speaks to feelings of inferiority and a feeling of inadequacy of the person doing the name calling.
People stoop to the process of name calling when they feel lesser and need to make themselves feel more powerful.

If calling someone a name upsets the person that is being called the name, then the name-caller feels more powerful because they upset them and had an effect on them.

The best way to deal with name-callers is to be calm and think about the reasons that they have called you a name. It has nothing to do with the person being called the name, and says a lot about the one doing the name calling.

I do not want to do business with anyone that is a name caller,
nor do I want to refer my clients to them. Just not going to do that...




Name Calling and What It Implies - Be Careful What You Say About Yourself When You Resort To Name Calling (activerain.com)
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
That “the Nazis were socialists” is literal Nazi propaganda which you obligingly parrot. The self-serving propaganda of an institute named in honor of a fascist regime’s collaborator demonstrates only the mendacity of those you rely on.
Yeah, it's not like they called themselves "socialists" or anything...oops!
 

protectionist

Governor
RADICALS OF THE STATE
Treasury Department tells employees all white people are racist.
July 15, 2020

And who was president?


I asked you if you had examples of CRT being taught in public schools. Clearly you do not.
I answered that months ago. Can you read ?

Currently, NO you did NOT ask that. Here are your exact words (with no reference to "public schools") >>> "Do you have an example of any CRT course material that is seditious, racist, criminal or "filth"? I'd bet not. "

As for the POTUS, the more pertinent question is who is the POTUS NOW.
 
I don't believe PJ has any Avatarists... Do you actually think, I believe I am a cup of coffee, and if someone alters it, I will be upset? lol
Those predictions regarding how Avatarists will become commonplace in the future... are just so much nonsense.
What do you think of your upper case T ?Would a smaller case t upset you? lol
Live Free of Dye or Die!

You can deny that you are an Avatarist all you want, but we know better and don't believe you. Critical Sage Theory is scientific and the end of history. It proves without a doubt that anyone who disagrees with my posts is an Avatarist; denials not accepted.

I should get paid for my posts, but the Mainstream Media rejected me simply because of the color of my avatar. Therefore, they owe me reparations. Big time!

You want me to change my avatar to the "right color." I ain't no Uncle Tom!
 
1. At a series of events at the Treasury Department and federal financial agencies, diversity trainer Howard Ross taught employees that America was “built on the backs of people who were enslaved” and that all white Americans are complicit in the system of white supremacy “by automatic response to the ways [they’re] taught.” In accompanying documents, Ross argues that white employees can be reduced to the quality of “whiteness,” which is a form of inborn oppression, and must “struggle to own their racism.” He instructs “white managers” to conduct “listening sessions” in which black employees can explain “what it means to be Black” and be “seen in their pain,” with white employees instructed to “sit in their discomfort” and not “fill the silence” with their “own thoughts and feelings.” Black employees, Mr. Ross says, are not “obligated to like you, thank you, feel sorry for you, or forgive you.” For trainings like this, Mr. Ross and his firm have been paid $5 million over 15 years, according to federal disclosures.

2. At the Sandia National Laboratories, which develops technology for America’s nuclear arsenal, executives held a racially segregated training session for white male employees. The three-day event, which was led by a company called White Men As Full Diversity Partners, set the goal of examining “white male culture” and making the employees take responsibility for their “while privilege,” “male privilege” and “heterosexual privilege.” In one of the opening exercises, the instructors wrote on a whiteboard that “white male culture” can be associated with “white supremacists,” “KKK,” “Aryan Nation,” “MAGA hat” and “mass killings.” On the final day, the trainers asked the employees to write letters to women and people of color, with one participant apologizing for his privilege and another pledging to “be a better ally.”

3. At the Department of Homeland Security, diversity trainers held a session on “microaggressions,” based on the work of psychologist Derald Sue. In his academic work, Dr. Sue argues that white Americans have been “fed a racial curriculum based on falsehoods, unwarranted fears, and the belief in their own superiority,” and thus have been “socialized into oppressor roles.” Trainers taught Homeland Security employees that the “myth of meritocracy” and “color blindness” are foundations of racist “microaggressions” and “microinequities.” The trainers insisted that phrases such as “America is the land of opportunity,” “Everybody can succeed in this society, if they work hard enough,” and “I believe the most qualified person should get the job” are racist statements that harm people of color. They are merely code for “People of color are lazy and/or incompetent and need to work harder.” If a white employee disagrees, his or her point of view is dismissed as a “denial of individual racism” which the trainers deem another type of microaggression.

Cult Programming in Seattle | City Journal (city-journal.org)

Obscene federal ‘diversity training’ scam prospers — even under Trump (nypost.com)

Nuclear Consequences (christopherrufo.com)

Radicals of the State (christopherrufo.com)

(2) Christopher F. Rufo ⚔ on Twitter: "Ross begins by claiming America was "founded on racism" and "built on the backs of people who were enslaved." He says modern America has upheld this system of white supremacy through "policing [and] discriminatory practices" for "hundreds and hundreds of years." https://t.co/AkjbDLwcyY" / Twitter

The Smallest Injustice (christopherrufo.com)
Amputate the Gangsta Gangrene Limbs

This witchdoctor's poison has infiltrated our country so deeply that patriots must declare their independence from such a putrid rotting carcass and reverse all the laws and customs that led to this terminal condition.
 

write on

Senator
It's a shame that more hasn't, and now won't, admit what I've been saying about the republican party for a very long time.

 

protectionist

Governor
It's a shame that more hasn't, and now won't, admit what I've been saying about the republican party for a very long time.

And what is it that you have been saying ? :rolleyes:
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
That’s the Nazi propaganda I was talking about, of course.
That is absurd! Hitler was an autocratic dictator - he could call himself the man on the moon if he wanted to. Why would he choose to call himself a "socilist" if he wasn't? He was definitely a central planner and a firm believer in government control of the means of production. You know, exactly like the neo-marxists in the Democratic party...
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
So Nazism favored integration? Of course not. They worked towards eliminating non-Aryans all together. Gypsies, Gays, Jews...were sent to the camps.

Abortion? They opposed abortion except for Jews.
Private property? The Nazis favored private property, and fought the communists and socialists.
Military? They devoted huge proportions of the national budget to the military and to industries that built arms.
Family? Very pro-family and were against women in the work place. The rewarded women who had lots of babies.
Religion? They mandated tithing...unless you were a Jew.
Gun Control? Not for members of the Nazi party. They relaxed rules about guns.

They were socialists like North Korea is a People's democratic republic.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
That is absurd! Hitler was an autocratic dictator - he could call himself the man on the moon if he wanted to. Why would he choose to call himself a "socilist" if he wasn't? He was definitely a central planner and a firm believer in government control of the means of production. You know, exactly like the neo-marxists in the Democratic party...
They sold themselves initially as socialists, but dropped any form of socialistic policy to get support from the bankers and industrialists.

He did not confiscate private property and only issued production rules for war time industry...so did every other country at war. The only private property that was taken by the state was that owned by Jews.
 

EatTheRich

President
That is absurd! Hitler was an autocratic dictator - he could call himself the man on the moon if he wanted to. Why would he choose to call himself a "socilist" if he wasn't? He was definitely a central planner and a firm believer in government control of the means of production. You know, exactly like the neo-marxists in the Democratic party...
The party he infiltrated on behalf of the government called itself "socialist" partly to appeal to the left in northern Germany where the party's middle-class base was allied with the aristocracy against the bourgeoisie in the tradition of the "True Socialists" criticized by Marx, but mostly to trick revolutionary-minded workers into attending their meetings so the Nazis could beat them up. As Hitler moved to take over the party and prepare for the fascist dictatorship, he of course turned on the "socialist" wing of the party, purging the Strasser faction that took "socialism" (in their reactionary sense) seriously.

Throughout the period of the Hitler dictatorship, the government, resting as it did on the mass party, was extremely sensitive to public opinion and used anticapitalist phraseology to mask its antilabor aims.
 
Top