I posted a link to testimony about how many accounts the Russians created and how many were posting in favor of Trump and how many in favor of Clinton. The numbers weren't close. I have repeatedly asked you to provide a link to back up your accusation that there were just as many for Clinton...and you've failed to find that info.
Who the hell is Hamilton 68 and what power did they have? Did they call a mob to DC to keep Trump from staying in power? Did you know it was shut down in 2018?
A recent "Twitter Files" drop revealed Twitter execs were concerned about a database that claimed to track Russian propaganda in "near real time."
www.businessinsider.com
You need some facts.
Nobody has claimed the Russian interference in 2016 changed a vote. That doesn't mean they did not break the law in the attempt.
You continue to argue that the FBI kept the laptop story from being spread around. That is a lie. I read it on the NYPost website. It was all over the place for anyone who cared to read it. There is not a single bit of evidence of corruption by Joe Biden and the investigation is being run by a republican appointed by Trump.
The FBI didn't say the laptop was a hack and leak from Russia. That was Twitter interpreting warnings about the potential as applying to the laptop. Twitter banned the story for 24 hours....that means people on Twitter could quote it, link to it, talk about it...
and it doesn't matter that the NYPost account was blocked. Did the Twitter files mention the FBI telling Twitter to block NYPost? No.
Once again...quote the NYPost article where it shows Joe did something that would have changed votes.