Now you claim that refusing to allow the senate to vote is not a veto. I guess you just aren't very bright or are simply massively dishonest.Deleted. Banned user.
Now you claim that refusing to allow the senate to vote is not a veto. I guess you just aren't very bright or are simply massively dishonest.Deleted. Banned user.
A senator cannot veto. The SENATE can. The SENATE did. Left wingers are extremely dumb.....and you hold a very special spot on that list.Now you claim that refusing to allow the senate to vote is not a veto. I guess you just aren't very bright or are simply massively dishonest.
A little more post editing….a little more lying…The bug remants are reproducing. Lmao. One cannot reject without consideration. We've been over it, sick one.
This one thinks legislative bodies need not vote to act…they can just act by giving off an aura.A senator cannot veto. The SENATE can. The SENATE did. Left wingers are extremely dumb.....and you hold a very special spot on that list.
Oh boy, now the this deranged creature believes the Senate cannot decline action by simply rejecting the proposal by the majority. How many billsitems get introduced that never make it the floor for a vote because the majority rejects them outright?This one thinks legislative bodies need not vote to act…they can just act by giving off an aura.
The fascist right wing senate spit in the face of our Forefathers!Oh boy, now the this deranged creature believes the Senate cannot decline action by simply rejecting the proposal by the majority. How many billsitems get introduced that never make it the floor for a vote because the majority rejects them outright?
My God, freaks abound.
They “declined action” alright. Moscow Mitch has that down to a science.Oh boy, now the this deranged creature believes the Senate cannot decline action by simply rejecting the proposal by the majority. How many billsitems get introduced that never make it the floor for a vote because the majority rejects them outright?
My God, freaks abound.
So now their "constitutional duty" is not to provide consent or no consent but is instead to do the "opposite" of rejecting an unqualified nominee declared so by the Senate majority? We have a bug that hates America so bad. What anThey “declined action” alright. Moscow Mitch has that down to a science.
Which is the opposite of fulfilling their constitutional duty to consider presidential nominees.
I’m done ridiculing you in this thread unless you stop the post editing and lying about what is said.So now their "constitutional duty" is not to provide consent or no consent but is instead to do the "opposite" of rejecting an unqualified nominee declared so by the Senate majority? We have a bug that hates America so bad. What an
awful creature.
Crying all you have left The? The bug is in its death throes for the 2nd time in a week. This pummeling was especially brutal this time. One cannot reason that rejection doesn't require consideration over and over without looking especially dumb.I’m done ridiculing you in this thread unless you stop the post editing and lying about what is said.
As if you could pull that off, eh?
;-)
You did resist post editing that time, but you lied, so you didn’t meet the conditions to earn more ridicule.Crying all you have left The? The bug is in its death throes for the 2nd time in a week. This pummeling was especially brutal this time. One cannot reason that rejection doesn't require consideration over and over without looking especially dumb.
You're already bloodied and dying. Why prolong your misery? One cannot reject without consideration of that they are rejecting.You didn’t meet the conditions to earn more ridicule.
Ah, you felt guilty about not post editing in that one reply, so you did it again, along with your constant lying.You're already bloodied and dying. Why prolong your misery? One cannot reject without consideration of that they are rejecting.
Making fun of certain mentally ill people sure is fun. Let's hear some more from this freak...