Last of the lifeboats are away on the SS Newt....he and Callista hanging on

[GordonGecko]

to the aft railing, Leo and Kate Winslet-style.


South Carolina Republican Presidential Primary
CNN/Time
Romney 37, Gingrich 18, Santorum 19, Paul 12, Perry 5, Huntsman 1 Romney +18

South Carolina Republican Presidential Primary
Rasmussen Reports
Romney 27, Gingrich 18, Santorum 24, Paul 11, Perry 5, Huntsman 2 Romney +3

 

[PhilFish]

Translation: "look at me look at me..."

zzzz... no one seems more engrossed than you...

 

[GordonGecko]

Phil....what REALLY would have "hurt", if your theory is true...would be you NOT posting a response here and it getting page pushed away.

So...I guess I should thank you?

 

[PhilFish]

but then you'd be discouraged from lack of attention and your recidivism would decline.

so, youre welcome..

 

[Bo-4]

Boy, that's interesting.. bet that Razzy is more current reflection the Santorum SUUUURGE!

RS is gonna win in SC..

 

[GordonGecko]

Ahhh...makes perfect sense, Phil. You chastise a post as "Look at me, look at me"....so you respond to it, bumping it back up to the top and inviting a response from the poster....

and then say you HAD to respond to it or else I would get discouraged and not post as many "Look at me, look at me" posts.

Flawlessly logical.

BTW, actually I think a good case would be that you ARE "engrossed" with MY posts.....likely simply because it's ME posting them.

 

[GordonGecko]

Boy, that's interesting.. bet that Razzy is more current reflection the Santorum SUUUURGE!

RS is gonna win in SC..

Be interesting....Gingrich could then have ZERO claim (even with a 3rd) that he's a viable candidate or the "people's choice for a real conservative". Neither could Rick Perry.

Of the two though, Perry would finally drop out...and Newt would insist on staying in it to Florida.

 

[PhilFish]

Chastize? nah. I made a statement. (you did, after all, post this thread..to a message board, no? said posting being an invitation to respond to begin with, no? or do these things function differently.....)

didnt say 'had' anywhere there....and 'engrossed', not quite..but i will admit bemused...

 

[GordonGecko]

Actually Phil, you said "no one" was engrossed in my post....and yet YOU and Bo both show up to comment on it.