New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Leftist War on Gas Stoves

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Control freaks. It’s in their DNA. They can leave no one and no thing alone. They ACHE to get their schnozzes into everyone’s business. They MUST prescribe. They sit and stew…forever conceiving the next restriction or coercion.
That's because, of course, they know it all. They are "know it alls" who are our betters so we should heed whatever crazy sh*t they say. What's the matter with you - you act like you are a free man allowed to think for himself. That is so "last century" - get with the program (or you will be forcibly reprogrammed.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
I agree that kids today , using old money need to back up and shut up. Same with lawyers and investment brokers - those who make money off others hard earned money. So with your logic the greatest losers kids fall into your catagory big time - himself included - he would have been a Used car salesman - ya think ? Funny how you exempted that family in your rant
Where would Hunter Biden fall?
 

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
No. The CO2 is increasing the heat energy balance by preventing heat from escaping.
The increase in atmospheric CO2 from 1820 to 2020 has only been 0.0123% (but of course my reference for 406 for 2020 has already been jacked). And that number is insignificant as it stands now. Wanna bitch about anthroGW move to India or China.

 

EatTheRich

President
The increase in atmospheric CO2 from 1820 to 2020 has only been 0.0123% (but of course my reference for 406 for 2020 has already been jacked). And that number is insignificant as it stands now. Wanna bitch about anthroGW move to India or China.

0.0123 percentage points, not 0.0123 percent (you do understand enough math to comprehend the difference, right?). And I already pointed out that the warming contributed by CO2 depends only on the total amount of CO2 (which is up about 45%) and not on relative levels. Per-capita emissions are much lower in China and India than in the U.S.
 

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
0.0123 percentage points, not 0.0123 percent (you do understand enough math to comprehend the difference, right?). And I already pointed out that the warming contributed by CO2 depends only on the total amount of CO2 (which is up about 45%) and not on relative levels. Per-capita emissions are much lower in China and India than in the U.S.
Have you started drinking again old commie?
 
No one. The only thing that will give a small clique 24/7 control over our personal lives and economy would be the consequences of unchecked global warming.
Unabomber: The Psychoses of a Theoretical Mathematician

Nerdy scientists get pushed around from childhood on. Lying about nature in order to create totalitarianism is their way of getting even. Another delusion motivating these toxic lab rats is that, having been picked on because they were gutless weaklings, they like to fantasize about being he-man superheroes saving the world from evil jock-capitalist bullies.
 

EatTheRich

President
Unabomber: The Psychoses of a Theoretical Mathematician

Nerdy scientists get pushed around from childhood on. Lying about nature in order to create totalitarianism is their way of getting even. Another delusion motivating these toxic lab rats is that, having been picked on because they were gutless weaklings, they like to fantasize about being he-man superheroes saving the world from evil jock-capitalist bullies.
The evidence is easily understood by a layperson with a modicum of education, and anyone who is not thoroughly convinced by the overwhelming, impossible to fake piles of evidence independently converging from dozens of sources is either stupid beyond words or dogmatically committed to remaining intentionally ignorant.
 
The evidence is easily understood by a layperson with a modicum of education, and anyone who is not thoroughly convinced by the overwhelming piles
Primitive Mindlessness Personifying Nature

The evidence is completely slanted into false worries and unnecessary reactions because of a totally unscientific belief that Natural Air is the safest atmosphere. This results in the paranoia that the by-products of an advanced economy and lifestyle must be destructive because they've never been in our air before the Twentieth Century. The designed and dishonest conclusion is that Nature cannot handle these new ingredients and will react violently.
 

EatTheRich

President
Primitive Mindlessness Personifying Nature

The evidence is completely slanted into false worries and unnecessary reactions because of a totally unscientific belief that Natural Air is the safest atmosphere. This results in the paranoia that the by-products of an advanced economy and lifestyle must be destructive because they've never been in our air before the Twentieth Century. The designed and dishonest conclusion is that Nature cannot handle these new ingredients and will react violently.
Again, the physical mechanism by which greenhouse gases slow the radiation of heat away from the Earth’s surface is well understood and is the only explanation consistent with observations for why the Earth is so much warmer than the moon. The increase in average temperature as a result is observed to be consonant with predictions and the evident effects are apparent to anyone who has been outside in the last decade.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Again, the physical mechanism by which greenhouse gases slow the radiation of heat away from the Earth’s surface is well understood and is the only explanation consistent with observations for why the Earth is so much warmer than the moon. The increase in average temperature as a result is observed to be consonant with predictions and the evident effects are apparent to anyone who has been outside in the last decade.
Lockdowns didn't change anything
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
Top