protectionist
Governor
All depends on the circumstances......chumpy.When a cop shoots or chokes an unarmed black man to death……Excellent
Whe a cop shoots an unarmed white woman to death………….Murder
We got you champy…..
All depends on the circumstances......chumpy.When a cop shoots or chokes an unarmed black man to death……Excellent
Whe a cop shoots an unarmed white woman to death………….Murder
We got you champy…..
Babbit had a hundred foot long 10,000 pound mob of violent insurrectionist backing her up. Once she got through every one of those reps that officer was there to protect would be at their mercy. They had proven their threat to life and safety, by violently overpowering the officers who tried to stop them prior to reaching that lone policeman.Wrong. Nothing at all like Michael Brown. Brown was a 6'5" 300 lb monster, who was charging at officer Wilson, and grabbing for his gun.
The physical evidence shows that he was staggering forward from multiple gunshot wounds when the fatal shots were fired into the top of his head.Wrong. Nothing at all like Michael Brown. Brown was a 6'5" 300 lb monster, who was charging at officer Wilson, and grabbing for his gun.
Well to the best of my knowledge, Babbit never laid a hand on a police officer. Micheal Brown did.You responded to the post comparing Brown and Babbit.
What is your opinion ?
How are they different or are they different ?
The Justice department report shows the shooting was justified.The physical evidence shows that he was staggering forward from multiple gunshot wounds when the fatal shots were fired into the top of his head.
Well, they would, wouldn’t they?The Justice department report shows the shooting was justified.
So, just like Micheal Brown when the cop shot him ?
Except she had multiple suspects with her and the officer was alone.
While Brown was all by himself with no attacking mob backing him up.
It wasn't his fault. It's the cop who needed more training on alternative ways to stop a suspect ?
That is how you see both situations, right ?
Why would they? Brown is in a grave because of his own actions.Well, they would, wouldn’t they?
99% NON-ViolentBabbit had a hundred foot long 10,000 pound mob of violent insurrectionist backing her up. Once she got through every one of those reps that officer was there to protect would be at their mercy. They had proven their threat to life and safety, by violently overpowering the officers who tried to stop them prior to reaching that lone policeman.
So, explain to me how Brown was more of a threat than her and her violent mob.
Because it’s their job to whitewash police brutality in order to maintain the system of terror whereby the lower classes and oppressed masses are kept in subjection.Why would they? Brown is in a grave because of his own actions.
Negative. They presented FACTS. You just don’t like the outcome. Stop acting like what went down was based on “jaywalking”, as that is not a truthful statement.Because it’s their job to whitewash police brutality in order to maintain the system of terror whereby the lower classes and oppressed masses are kept in subjection.
His own actions=jaywalking?
That was Wilson’s stated reason for stopping Brown.Negative. They presented FACTS. You just don’t like the outcome. Stop acting like what went down was based on “jaywalking”, as that is not a truthful statement.
And? A police officer can stop anyone who in endangering either himself or others.That was Wilson’s stated reason for stopping Brown.
Police ought to put the public safety ahead of their own. A given cop is more likely to survive a traffic stop than a given civilian.In discussing the TOPIC, I just watched some traffic stops, in which all the stops were made for speeding. Most of these where white cops and black drivers. In every instance of black drivers, they threw a tantrum, obstructed the police (a crime), foolishly acted like they had done nothing wrong, injected race into the scenario claiming they were being victimized, and threatened the police with a lawsuit.
In every case, the drivers or their friends/relatives argued with the police, trying to show knowledge of law and law enforcement, while allowing their hands to disappear from the cops' view. These people were all lucky to have gotten through this alive, while by all rights of police academy training, they should have all been shot dead, when their hands went out of view of the cops.
In all the cases, the drivers went to jail, when they didnt have to, if they just would have kept their mouths shut, and just followed directions and take the ticket.
Instead of the overexaggerated "police brutality" blabber so frequently hollered by the police hating left, there are millions more cases where police actually endangered their own lives, by allowing people to conceal their hands, as the cops gambled with their lives.
Or because they have seen police flagrantly using pretext stops to shake them down as the Ferguson police department was found to have engaged in a pattern of doing by the DOJ.And? A police officer can stop anyone who in endangering either himself or others.
Police officer Wilson was cleared of Federal rights violations by the Justice department.Police ought to put the public safety ahead of their own. A given cop is more likely to survive a traffic stop than a given civilian.
Perhaps if Black people have a combative attitude toward police it’s because the majority personally know someone who has been murdered by police.
Or because they have seen police flagrantly using pretext stops to shake them down as the Ferguson police department was found to have engaged in a pattern of doing by the DOJ.
A conclusion that was decided on at the outset of, and determined the parameters of, their investigation.Police officer Wilson was cleared of Federal rights violations by the Justice department.
Sure….like the conclusion the media decided on at the outset. Like “hands up, don’t shoot”. The media ran with a story without waiting for the facts.A conclusion that was decided on at the outset of, and determined the parameters of, their investigation.
Were the media supposed to hide the protesters’ use of that slogan from the public by censoring their coverage?Sure….like the conclusion the media decided on at the outset. Like “hands up, don’t shoot”. The media ran with a story without waiting for the facts.
LOL. The media should have done some research. They did not. They ran with an unsubstantiated story.Were the media supposed to hide the protesters’ use of that slogan from the public by censoring their coverage?