New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Major corporate donors silent on Black Lives Matter's alleged self-dealing

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
Major corporations that made a show out of cutting checks to the national Black Lives Matter group in the aftermath of George Floyd's police killing in May 2020 now have nothing to say about the charity's alleged self-dealing.
Major corporate donors silent on Black Lives Matter's alleged self-dealing (msn.com)

Nobody should have a problem with this. Socialism is and always will be, give everything to the leadership and get nothing in return. (See every socialist regime). Why should anybody be surprised that they were thieves.
 

Spamature

President
Major corporations that made a show out of cutting checks to the national Black Lives Matter group in the aftermath of George Floyd's police killing in May 2020 now have nothing to say about the charity's alleged self-dealing.
Major corporate donors silent on Black Lives Matter's alleged self-dealing (msn.com)

Nobody should have a problem with this. Socialism is and always will be, give everything to the leadership and get nothing in return. (See every socialist regime). Why should anybody be surprised that they were thieves.
You know, when I see all the folks on the right who turn down SS and medicare and demanded to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars out of their own pockets instead of Uncle Sam picking up the tab for their time in the ICU with Covid because they refused to get vaccinated, I start to wonder how serious you Righties are about shunning socialism.

It's almost like you are talking out of both sides of your mouth.
Well one side at least since the other is on the govt teet of American Socialism.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
You know, when I see all the folks on the right who turn down SS and medicare and demanded to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars out of their own pockets instead of Uncle Sam picking up the tab for their time in the ICU with Covid because they refused to get vaccinated, I start to wonder how serious you Righties are about shunning socialism.

It's almost like you are talking out of both sides of your mouth.
Well one side at least since the other is on the govt teet of American Socialism.

Odd tangent . At issue ..did blm fleece it's donors by giving monies intended to help.others towards the enrichment of the founders friends and family...?

Yes. Yes it did
 

Spamature

President
Odd tangent . At issue ..did blm fleece it's donors by giving monies intended to help.others towards the enrichment of the founders friends and family...?

Yes. Yes it did
As anyone been arrested, charged and convicted for fleecing their donors
You know, like some former admin members, Steve Bannon and such.

I don't know if they did anything wrong.
Do you ?
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
As anyone been arrested, charged and convicted for fleecing their donors
You know, like some former admin members, Steve Bannon and such.

I don't know if they did anything wrong.
Do you ?
Ha. Even more tangents. If you don't think blm did anything wrong, then I guess you're saying former admin members and Bannon did nothing wrong.

Please affirm this is your stance?
 

Spamature

President
Ha. Even more tangents. If you don't think blm did anything wrong, then I guess you're saying former admin members and Bannon did nothing wrong.

Please affirm this is your stance?
They were arrest and convicted of their wrong doing.
Of course, their crime boss was in a position to had out pardons.

So are you affirming you think their crimes were okay since the consequences were averted ?
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
They were arrest and convicted of their wrong doing.
Of course, their crime boss was in a position to had out pardons.

So are you affirming you think their crimes were okay since the consequences were averted ?
I'm affirming that you are afraid to address the topic at hand so you scurrilously repeatedly change the topic.

Or .are you saying blm are members of a presidential administration!??

+2 me.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
They were arrest and convicted of their wrong doing.
Of course, their crime boss was in a position to had out pardons.

So are you affirming you think their crimes were okay since the consequences were averted ?

Perhaps what you need to do is to compare self dealing charities...

Try blm vs Clinton foundation....then I think you have a valid self enrichment argument.
 

Spamature

President
I'm affirming that you are afraid to address the topic at hand so you scurrilously repeatedly change the topic.

Or .are you saying blm are members of a presidential administration!??

+2 me.
I addressed it when I asked if anyone was charged or convicted for a crime. If how they spent what was donated to them was a crime, charge them.

If it is something you don't approve of ?
Then shove it and start your own chapter of BLM and spend the money the way you think it should be spent.

Same goes for the NRA who really did take their donor for a ride.
But then again the KGB seem to get their donations worth out of it.

Maybe it would be okay if BLM did more for our enemies with that money. Maybe they could fund a Russian tank or two.
 

Spamature

President
Perhaps what you need to do is to compare self dealing charities...

Try blm vs Clinton foundation....then I think you have a valid self enrichment argument.
Or BLM vs another foundation who used to share the name of a Presidential family ?

That way I can say one of them was shut down, and it wasn't BLM.
So does that means it matter who you compare them to when you think about self enrichment arguments ?
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
I addressed it when I asked if anyone was charged or convicted for a crime. If how they spent what was donated to them was a crime, charge them.

If it is something you don't approve of ?
Then shove it and start your own chapter of BLM and spend the money the way you think it should be spent.

Same goes for the NRA who really did take their donor for a ride.
But then again the KGB seem to get their donations worth out of it.

Maybe it would be okay if BLM did more for our enemies with that money. Maybe they could fund a Russian tank or two.
Lol. Is that a 'waaaaa'. Why yes. It think it is.

+3 me
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
Or BLM vs another foundation who used to share the name of a Presidential family ?

That way I can say one of them was shut down, and it wasn't BLM.
So does that means it matter who you compare them to when you think about self enrichment arguments ?
Honest people would simply say blm are thieves, too.
 
Odd tangent . At issue ..did blm fleece it's donors by giving monies intended to help.others towards the enrichment of the founders friends and family...?

Yes. Yes it did
Well if that’s what some newspaper or website said, it must be gospel truth, right Phil? I have not seen any legal action taken against them yet, have you? I know all this false indignation started when the NY Post did a huge story regarding the purchase of a “million dollar mansion“ in Topanga Canyon a year or so back.

I saw the place (I used to live on the same street) and actually It’s a three bedroom, three bath home on a small lot in an old hippy haven in the hills. Then with scumbag buzzards from the Post peering in her windows and digging through her trash, the uppity negro woman had the temerity to build a fence which cost $35,000 to keep these nosy buzzards off her property. The nerve!

Now it has been revealed that this foundation which has raised well over $100,000,000 has purchased a $6,000,000 House in Sherman Oaks which is being used to produce video content for their stated mission and other business of the non profit. They also paid a few million to people in charge of security and other costs of running the foundation. One of those paid was a “baby daddy” of the evil woman. These evil, uppity negroes really chap your hide, don’t they? lol

Here’s what I say: Fvck the NY Post and the rest of those gossiping old bags and bagolas cackling about how horrible BLM is. I have sent them money and I certainly don’t feel fleeced. I also support their stated mission and wish them the best. I also hope the founders and those who work for them live comfortable, peaceful, productive lives. Even if they are stepping above their class. I wonder when the Post is going to do a big expose on the Heritage Foundation, or the hundreds of others who own billions in high rent real estate and their chairmen live like kings and princes who dole out millions to all their friends and families on a weekly basis?
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
You know, when I see all the folks on the right who turn down SS and medicare and demanded to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars out of their own pockets instead of Uncle Sam picking up the tab for their time in the ICU with Covid because they refused to get vaccinated, I start to wonder how serious you Righties are about shunning socialism.

It's almost like you are talking out of both sides of your mouth.
Well one side at least since the other is on the govt teet of American Socialism.
You stupid illegal.....Americans can not turn down Medicare when they reach 65............
 

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
As anyone been arrested, charged and convicted for fleecing their donors
You know, like some former admin members, Steve Bannon and such.

I don't know if they did anything wrong.
Do you ?
The answer depends on which lens you view this from:

1. The leftist view...It's right to shut up while they steal as long as I get mine.

2. The sane view...It's right to do what you said.

BLM didn't.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
They were arrest and convicted of their wrong doing.
Of course, their crime boss was in a position to had out pardons.

So are you affirming you think their crimes were okay since the consequences were averted ?
"had out pardons"
:)
 

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
Well if that’s what some newspaper or website said, it must be gospel truth, right Phil? I have not seen any legal action taken against them yet, have you? I know all this false indignation started when the NY Post did a huge story regarding the purchase of a “million dollar mansion“ in Topanga Canyon a year or so back.

I saw the place (I used to live on the same street) and actually It’s a three bedroom, three bath home on a small lot in an old hippy haven in the hills. Then with scumbag buzzards from the Post peering in her windows and digging through her trash, the uppity negro woman had the temerity to build a fence which cost $35,000 to keep these nosy buzzards off her property. The nerve!

Now it has been revealed that this foundation which has raised well over $100,000,000 has purchased a $6,000,000 House in Sherman Oaks which is being used to produce video content for their stated mission and other business of the non profit. They also paid a few million to people in charge of security and other costs of running the foundation. One of those paid was a “baby daddy” of the evil woman. These evil, uppity negroes really chap your hide, don’t they? lol

Here’s what I say: Fvck the NY Post and the rest of those gossiping old bags and bagolas cackling about how horrible BLM is. I have sent them money and I certainly don’t feel fleeced. I also support their stated mission and wish them the best. I also hope the founders and those who work for them live comfortable, peaceful, productive lives. Even if they are stepping above their class. I wonder when the Post is going to do a big expose on the Heritage Foundation, or the hundreds of others who own billions in high rent real estate and their chairmen live like kings and princes who dole out millions to all their friends and families on a weekly basis?
Hilarious.

I wouldn't in California rent a film studio for less...Btw isn't Sherman Oaks the porn capital of America. II go 70/30 if BLM keeps the house we will see video soon.
 
Top