Marjorie Taylor Greene accosts AOC; gets blown off

[UPNYA2]

A smart person would not say that.

Just so you know.

;-)

Really?

A smart person would not say that you can't know one person has an IQ 30 points higher than another person unless you had seen the results of an IQ test each had taken?

That a smart person would just accept whatever another person said based upon nothing more than what they believe or feel on a matter?

Why is that?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Really?

A smart person would not say that you can't know one person has an IQ 30 points higher than another person unless you had seen the results of an IQ test each had taken?

That a smart person would just accept whatever another person said based upon nothing more than what they believe or feel on a matter?

Why is that?

Again, if you were a smart person you would not say “prove it” on a web forum when someone contends that one person has an IQ higher than another.

Not being smart, you can’t understand why that is the case. So, you just rant some more.

;-)

 

[UPNYA2]

Again, if you were a smart person you would not say “prove it” on a web forum when someone contends that one person has an IQ higher than another.

Not being smart, you can’t understand why that is the case. So, you just rant some more.

;-)

Actually, I am smart enough to know that it is dumb to ask anyone to prove anything they believe to be so on a forum full of people posting their views and opinions such as this one.

I am also smart enough to ask for proof of your opinion because you love to ask others to provide proof of whatever they post they feel or believe in an attempt to show you how two faced that makes you look.

Otherwise you would just accept when a poster says he believes the election was stolen, that AOC is about as bright as a burned out black light bulb or that Biden is a puppet of other socialist.

Do you?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Actually, I am smart enough to know that it is dumb to ask anyone to prove anything they believe to be so on a forum full of people posting their views and opinions such as this one.

I am also smart enough to ask for proof of your opinion because you love to ask others to provide proof of whatever they post they feel or believe in an attempt to show you how two faced that makes you look.

Otherwise you would just accept when a poster says he believes the election was stolen, that AOC is about as bright as a burned out black light bulb or that Biden is a puppet of other socialist.

Do you?

Hello? One cannot “prove opinions.”

You just can’t make sense, no matter how hard you try.

 

[middleview]

That so "sad and stupid" because you insulted Trump. But is she a Future President? Isn't that a little early to suggest? Consider this:

Hillary Clinton: 64 million votes.

Barack Obama: 68 million votes.

Joe Biden: 84 million votes.

Clearly thinking she could win is "sad and stupid." Obviously you have to be male preferably racists and white to get the nomination. AOC has two of the three just like Hillary.

Trump v Clinton....he lost by 3 million votes
Trump v Biden..... he lost by 7 million votes

The only reason he became president in 2016 is that people didn't know him well...In 2020 we knew him too well.

Sad and stupid is evidenced by the attempts to say Trump won the election and every state that certified Biden's win was corrupt and that every judge who ruled against Trump in 60 lawsuits was either afraid or corrupt and that the Supreme Court refused to hear the evidence and that when Congress certified the election they were being blackmailed or some such bullshit....

 

[JuliefromOhio]

AOC says of MTG: “I used to work as a bartender. These are the kinds of people that I threw out of bars all the time.”

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

AOC says of MTG: “I used to work as a bartender. These are the kinds of people that I threw out of bars all the time.”

hee hee...the House needs a bouncer to take care of the GOP reprobates.

;-)

 

[Spamature]

View attachment 63041

It so "sad and stupid" that we have to point these things out about someone who is supposed to speak on our behalf.

Something other than the usual pattern of Trump lying his ass off ?

Not really...

But it is sad that after 20000 of his lies I have to point out that a liar is speaking on your behalf.

 

[middleview]

Actually, I am smart enough to know that it is dumb to ask anyone to prove anything they believe to be so on a forum full of people posting their views and opinions such as this one.

I am also smart enough to ask for proof of your opinion because you love to ask others to provide proof of whatever they post they feel or believe in an attempt to show you how two faced that makes you look.

Otherwise you would just accept when a poster says he believes the election was stolen, that AOC is about as bright as a burned out black light bulb or that Biden is a puppet of other socialist.

Do you?

Claiming the election was stolen is an accusation of massive criminal actions. It isn't just an opinion. If you have no facts to refute those others have posted to show the election was verifiably fair and legitimate, then your insistence that every election official in PA, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona and Georgia is corrupt and that Trump's own head of Cyber Security (Krebs) is lying and the judges in over 60 court cases ruled against Trump because of some motivation other than there simply was no credible proof offered or that they had no legal standing to bring the lawsuit at all...is simply a stubborn attempt to deny reality.

Trump lost. That is not an opinion. It is a fact. When someone posts "Yeah, but what about those fraudulent ballots that were hidden under a table in Atlanta" they are expressing the opinion that they were not legitimate ballots. There is no evidence to support the accusation. Are you beginning to see the difference between fact and opinion.

 

[UPNYA2]

Claiming the election was stolen is an accusation of massive criminal actions. It isn't just an opinion. If you have no facts to refute those others have posted to show the election was verifiably fair and legitimate, then your insistence that every election official in PA, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona and Georgia is corrupt and that Trump's own head of Cyber Security (Krebs) is lying and the judges in over 60 court cases ruled against Trump because of some motivation other than there simply was no credible proof offered or that they had no legal standing to bring the lawsuit at all...is simply a stubborn attempt to deny reality.

Trump lost. That is not an opinion. It is a fact. When someone posts "Yeah, but what about those fraudulent ballots that were hidden under a table in Atlanta" they are expressing the opinion that they were not legitimate ballots. There is no evidence to support the accusation. Are you beginning to see the difference between fact and opinion.

I am not arguing the election results, don't get distracted.

What I am arguing is that a poster wants proof of other people's stated opinions on matters, any matter, yet offers none to support his own opinions when they are posted.

Things such as one having a higher IQ than another when we know full well the poster has no way of knowing that to be so. But if one poster can just say something and expect it to be taken seriously than all others can as well.

That is the point I was arguing, nothing more.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

I am not arguing the election results, don't get distracted.

What I am arguing is that a poster wants proof of other people's stated opinions on matters, any matter, yet offers none to support his own opinions when they are posted.

Things such as one having a higher IQ than another when we know full well the poster has no way of knowing that to be so. But if one poster can just say something and expect it to be taken seriously than all others can as well.

That is the point I was arguing, nothing more.

You really need to learn the difference between facts and opinions.

BTW, AOC finished second in the prestigious Intel international science competition. Do you think that’s suggestive of a high IQ?

Dodge away...

 

[middleview]

You really need to learn the difference between facts and opinions.

BTW, AOC finished second in the prestigious Intel international science competition. Do you think that’s suggestive of a high IQ?

Dodge away...

And Greene suggested the Jews have an orbiting laser that can start fires in California...does that suggest a low IQ?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

And Greene suggested the Jews have an orbiting laser that can start fires in California...does that suggest a low IQ?

Either that or psychosis, or both.

;-)

 

[UPNYA2]

You really need to learn the difference between facts and opinions.

BTW, AOC finished second in the prestigious Intel international science competition. Do you think that’s suggestive of a high IQ?

Dodge away...

Nothing to dodge.

"Suggestive"?

Sure.

She also has said such intellectual sh_t as, the world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change and that we have three chambers (not branches mind you, chambers) of government, the president, the Senate, and the House, not executive, legislative and judicial, really brilliant sh_t like that.

Do you think that’s suggestive of a high IQ?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Nothing to dodge.

"Suggestive"?

Sure.

She also has said such intellectual sh_t as, the world is going to end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change and that we have three chambers (not branches mind you, chambers) of government, the president, the Senate, and the House, not executive, legislative and judicial, really brilliant sh_t like that.

Do you think that’s suggestive of a high IQ?

I think everything she has said and accomplished is suggestive of a high IQ. I’m glad to see you have come around on this. A rare example of a winger learning something.

 

[UPNYA2]

I think everything she has said and accomplished is suggestive of a high IQ. I’m glad to see you have come around on this. A rare example of a winger learning something.

"Everything"?

Well, saying that does speak VOLUMNS about YOUR IQ I suppose...

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

"Everything"?

Well, saying that does speak VOLUMNS about YOUR IQ I suppose...

Yes, everything. I suspect you think someone does not have a high IQ if they misspeak from time to time, even if they are highly accomplished in intellectual pursuits. Of course, if you had a high IQ you would not think that.

BTW, how did you do in the Intel international science competition?

;-)

 

[bdtex]

Check out this nut, stalking AOC and yelling lies at her.

AOC, smooth as silk, did what should always be done with crude GOP QAnon wackjobs - she ignored her and walked away.

;-)

Marjorie Taylor Greene confronts Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez outside House chamber

Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene confronted Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez outside the House chamber on Wednesday afternoon, the latest of several confrontations Greene has had with her Democratic colleagues.

www.cnn.com

As you know, it started way before that. MTG is a stalker. This is 2019.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1393208622054842368

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

As you know, it started way before that. MTG is a stalker. This is 2019.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1393208622054842368

I’ll see that deplorable MTG stalking episode and raise you this one...

Today’s GOP - stalking survivors of school shootings.

 

[UPNYA2]

Yes, everything. I suspect you think someone does not have a high IQ if they misspeak from time to time, even if they are highly accomplished in intellectual pursuits. Of course, if you had a high IQ you would not think that.

BTW, how did you do in the Intel international science competition?

;-)

Never been in one.

And?

How did AOC do in her last international deadlift competition?
Do you think that’s suggestive of her being a weakling?

See how this "logic" is a bit silly yet?