New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

NAACP officially endorses Trump for reelection

Drumcollie

Ending Racism with or without Hillary
That should read, "Only an idiot doesn't check his sources before they post something this bizarre."
Derrick Johnson, president and CEO of the NAACP, made the following statement about a remark by former Vice President Joe Biden during his Friday morning interview on “The Breakfast Club.”

“Yesterday, former Vice President Joe Biden made a comment about the NAACP’s endorsement. We want to clarify that the NAACP is a non-partisan organization and does not endorse candidates for political office at any level. Persons affiliated with the NAACP at the national, state, and local levels are free to make candidate endorsements in a personal capacity, but they do not reflect support by the NAACP as an organization. The NAACP has one mission and that is fighting for and advancing our Black communities towards an equitable reality. Our primary focus at this moment is to ensure that our communities that have been victims of domestic terrorism and disproportionately impacted by this pandemic have the opportunity to cast their powerful vote come November.”


They won't be endorsing Joe Biden either...It's fun to read the panic in the left's posts.
 

Drumcollie

Ending Racism with or without Hillary
No, NAACP isn't backing Donald Trump in 2020 | PolitiFact ...
https://www.politifact.com › statements › dec › facebook-posts › no-naacp...

Claim: The NAACP endorsed Donald Trump in the 2020 election.
Claimed by: Facebook posts
Fact check by PolitiFact: Pants on Fire

Feedback
Did the NAACP Endorse Trump for 2020? - Snopes.com
https://www.snopes.com › Fact Checks › Politics

Dec 9, 2019 - On Dec. 6, 2019, Daily World Update published an article positing that the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored ...
NAACP Officially Endorses Trump For 2020 Election – Daily ...
https://dailyworldupdate.us › naacp-officially-endorses-trump-for-2020-ele...

Back in 2016, the NAACP back Democrat Hillary Clinton for President. They were adamant that she had the best interests of their members in mind and were ...
Any website that says the NAACP endorsed Hillary is a hoax.
 

Drumcollie

Ending Racism with or without Hillary
why not learn to read and then make a comment that is at least somewhat rational? The Resolution never mentioned an "invasion," never mentioned war, it did specifically mention "the use of force," which the President already had by the War Powers Act anyway. It was just a way of intimidating Saddam to allow the inspectors back in!! And it worked!! Like Clinton hoped when she explained on the Senate floor why she was voting for it...

the Resolution passed on October 16, 2002, Saddam allowed the inspectors back in a month later in November...the Resolution was moot at this point!!

The actual invasion did not occur until March!! long after the Resolution had worked and Saddam had complied!!

why can't even a trump voter understand this?
Because you are wrong again...Let's correct your mistakes here:

AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002

116 STAT. 1498
PUBLIC LAW 107–243—OCT. 16, 2002

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES. (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to—
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.
(b) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION.—In connection with the exercise of the authority granted in subsection
(a) to use force the President shall, prior to such exercise or as soon thereafter as may be feasible, but no later than 48 hours after exercising such authority, make available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate his determination that—
(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic or other peaceful means alone either
(A) will not adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq or
(B) is not likely to lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and
(2) acting pursuant to this joint resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorist and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.
(c) WAR POWERS RESOLUTION REQUIREMENTS.— (1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION.—Consistent with section 8(a)
(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.
(2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS.—Nothing in this joint resolution supersedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.


Hillary voted to supersede the war powers act.

  • 29 (58%) of 50 Democratic senators voted for the resolution. Those voting for the resolution were:
Sens. Baucus (D-MT), Bayh (D-IN), Biden (D-DE), Breaux (D-LA), Cantwell (D-WA), Carnahan (D-MO), Carper (D-DE), Cleland (D-GA), Clinton (D-NY), Daschle (D-SD), Dodd (D-CT), Dorgan (D-ND), Edwards (D-NC), Feinstein (D-CA), Harkin (D-IA), Hollings (D-SC), Johnson (D-SD), Kerry (D-MA), Kohl (D-WI), Landrieu (D-LA), Lieberman (D-CT), Lincoln (D-AR), Miller (D-GA), Nelson (D-FL), Nelson (D-NE), Reid (D-NV), Rockefeller (D-WV), Schumer (D-NY), and Torricelli (D-NJ).

You really never understood what Hillary voted for huh?
 
Top