New Florida law bans residential protesting.

[make speed limit 45]

This is wrong. Protesting near someone's home is free speech and should be allowed. Conservatives should use this tactic too.

In wake of abortion rights protests, Gov. DeSantis signs bill banning residential picketing

While protests are in the news again, lawmakers filed the bill back in January.

floridapolitics.com

 

[PhilFish]

This is wrong. Protesting near someone's home is free speech and should be allowed. Conservatives should use this tactic too.

In wake of abortion rights protests, Gov. DeSantis signs bill banning residential picketing

While protests are in the news again, lawmakers filed the bill back in January.

floridapolitics.com

In front of the homes of. Not cool.

 

[ObamacareForever]

In front of the homes of. Not cool.

It's clearly an unconstitutional law. Whether you agree with the speech or not, they have a right to do it.

 

[PhilFish]

It's clearly an unconstitutional law. Whether you agree with the speech or not, they have a right to do it.

To my knowledge there is no constitutionally protected guarantee on private property. On public property sure.

 

[make speed limit 45]

In front of the homes of. Not cool.

But should it be illegal? This is free speech.

 

[make speed limit 45]

To my knowledge there is no constitutionally protected guarantee on private property. On public property sure.

We're talking about protesters on the streets and sidewalks in front of the house. The article is misleading about that. They mention protesters on the lawns but that's not what the law is about.

 

[PhilFish]

But should it be illegal? This is free speech.

I believe for the judiciary..it is. Let's look it up.

 

[PhilFish]

We're talking about protesters on the streets and sidewalks in front of the house. The article is misleading about that. They mention protesters on the lawns but that's not what the law is about.

I believe the law prohibits the attempted influence of justices by menacing, threat of harm, etc

 

[ObamacareForever]

I believe the law prohibits the attempted influence of justices by menacing, threat of harm, etc

Do you have a specific incident you are referring to?

Or are you just annoyed that people are exercising their 1st Amendment rights and you want to criminalize it?

 

[ObamacareForever]

We're talking about protesters on the streets and sidewalks in front of the house. The article is misleading about that. They mention protesters on the lawns but that's not what the law is about.

If they are on people's lawns there are already trespassing laws. There is no need to for this law.

 

[sensible don]

To my knowledge there is no constitutionally protected guarantee on private property. On public property sure.

The road and usually 20 feet of your property next to the street is public right of way and thus public land. If it were " private" then you could shut the road and sidewalk down now couldn't you.

 

[sensible don]

I believe the law prohibits the attempted influence of justices by menacing, threat of harm, etc

so what do you call the Jan. 6 "picnic" then ? That was private property - AMIRIGHT? There was " menacing, threat of harm" to say the least. In the right wing playbook the SCOTUS protestors should storm the front door and defecate on the judge's couch, steal his belongings and erect a gallows - all in the name of a peaceful protest

 

[PhilFish]

Do you have a specific incident you are referring to?

Or are you just annoyed that people are exercising their 1st Amendment rights and you want to criminalize it?

How do you mean? Are you saying there have not been protests outside justices homes???

I am not annoyed.

 

[PhilFish]

The road and usually 20 feet of your property next to the street is public right of way and thus public land. If it were " private" then you could shut the road and sidewalk down now couldn't you.

Why yes. Anyway..... influence. Do keep up

 

[PhilFish]

so what do you call the Jan. 6 "picnic" then ? That was private property - AMIRIGHT? There was " menacing, threat of harm" to say the least. In the right wing playbook the SCOTUS protestors should storm the front door and defecate on the judge's couch, steal his belongings and erect a gallows - all in the name of a peaceful protest

Are you some sort of retard? Pretend to me there was some support on my part of Jan 6..?

 

[ObamacareForever]

How do you mean? Are you saying there have not been protests outside justices homes???

I am not annoyed.

"Outside the justices homes" covers like 99.99999999999% of the earth's surface.

So, yes, there have been protests outside the justices homes.

 

[JuliefromOhio]

This is wrong. Protesting near someone's home is free speech and should be allowed. Conservatives should use this tactic too.

In wake of abortion rights protests, Gov. DeSantis signs bill banning residential picketing

While protests are in the news again, lawmakers filed the bill back in January.

floridapolitics.com

They call DeSantis little Hitler.

 

[PhilFish]

"Outside the justices homes" covers like 99.99999999999% of the earth's surface.

So, yes, there have been protests outside the justices homes.

So?

 

[Dawg]

"Outside the justices homes" covers like 99.99999999999% of the earth's surface.

So, yes, there have been protests outside the justices homes.

and you claim to be an accountant!
Florida has a Stand Your Ground Law

 

[Boltlady]

The road and usually 20 feet of your property next to the street is public right of way and thus public land. If it were " private" then you could shut the road and sidewalk down now couldn't you.

Is there something that says that 20ft thing is everywhere? If true I should send the city a bill for all the money I've paid through the years to have it's land mowed.