Americans versus imported communists is how America dies. Third world communalist values are strangulating the country.Left vs Right
This is how America dies.
You approve of the election process when Trump won, but now think it is pretty f*cked up because he lost.You defend a closed election process where the Wizard of Oz declares the winner.
Joe McCarthy said the same thing- just like Kevin McCarthy.Americans versus imported communists is how America dies. Third world communalist values are strangulating the country.
So you made an accusation, but can't find proof...got it.
Joe was right. But in the end a Senator doesn't have much to do with a House committee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Joe McCarthy said the same thing- just like Kevin McCarthy.
No, you're my hero.Are they both your heroes?
I have family that could vouch that I complain every election that the big cities delay in reporting is not acceptable going back decades. So, honestly, piss off.You approve of the election process when Trump won, but now think it is pretty f*cked up because he lost.
I wondered why you didn't read Zam Zam's threadCommunists have always defended the unalienated individual, free thought, and freedom of conscience. That’s what distinguishes us on the left from the Nazis and other fascists on the right.
You did not complain after 2016...back when you were here as resident evil.I have family that could vouch that I complain every election that the big cities delay in reporting is not acceptable going back decades. So, honestly, piss off.
Does the Wizard of Oz have acolytes or are you enrolled at Hogwarts an aspiring Wizard in your own right?
I suppose you don't know you're defective in some way.You have yet to produce credible evidence of any of your bullshit accusations about the election.
I suppose you don't know you are defeated in every election fraud thread you post in.I suppose you don't know you're defective in some way.
YOU: "Government said it was a fair so it was fair. You don't get to look at the ballots and, if you do, you can't look at all of them and you can only count them you can't inspect them for authenticity."I suppose you don't know you are defeated in every election fraud thread you post in.
If you weren't so ignorant of election processes you'd understand how your allegation of ballots that were not authentic ballots is simply stupid.YOU: "Government said it was a fair so it was fair. You don't get to look at the ballots and, if you do, you can't look at all of them and you can only count them you can't inspect them for authenticity."
You're delusional. You ass and boot lick government and call yourself a winner. ha ha
How are they an “elected representative body” if chosen in elections conducted by those you call “unelected, biased, govt. bootlicking, bureaucrats” in elections you claim are illegitimate?Can't tell the legitimacy difference between an elected representative body and unelected, biased, govt. booklicking, bureaucrats? Clearly a communist/nazi/fascist trait.
So you assert that anybody who gets a mail-in-ballot has a barcode across the top that in effect nullifies their anonymous vote?If you weren't so ignorant of election processes you'd understand how your allegation of ballots that were not authentic ballots is simply stupid.
Ballots are printed with serial numbers embedded in the qcode. If a ballot does not have a valid serial number it cannot be counted. If it is a duplicate ballot number it cannot be counted. In addition invalid numbers would trigger an investigation...there were no invalid serial numbers in any state.
Now...if you were right and somehow someone stole thousands of ballots in the battleground states and somehow marked them for a candidate...
If you tried to get them added to the mix as in person votes then the count of voters who went to the polls in person wouldn't match the number of ballots counted. They also would not match the poll books.
If you tried to introduce them as mail in ballots you'd have a problem with the serial number on the envelope. It would have to match the serial number of the ballot mailed out to a voter. If it did, then you have to worry about whether or not that voter already voted in person or by mail. You'd also have to make sure your signature on the envelope matches the signature on the voter registration.
You spend your time avoiding answering these points...effectively kissing Trump's ass.
If you have the hardware to read the barcode and you have access to the voter database, you could determine who that person voted for. At the first stage for mail in ballots the person to handle the envelope verifies that serial number & the voter name, address and signature. Then the envelope is passed to a cutter who seperates the envelope from the ballot. the ballot is then placed in a ballot carrier and when the carrier is full it is taken to the tabulators.So you assert that anybody who gets a mail-in-ballot has a barcode across the top that in effect nullifies their anonymous vote?
Do you get it now? Think about it if you don't. Then get back to me.If you have the hardware to read the barcode and you have access to the voter database, you could determine who that person voted for. At the first stage for mail in ballots the person to handle the envelope verifies that serial number & the voter name, address and signature. Then the envelope is passed to a cutter who seperates the envelope from the ballot. the ballot is then placed in a ballot carrier and when the carrier is full it is taken to the tabulators.
No. The vote is not nullified. The person validating the envelope does not have access to the ballot itself.
You: Trump, Giuliani, Powell, Wood and Mike Lindell say it was a stolen election...so it was stolen.YOU: "Government said it was a fair so it was fair. You don't get to look at the ballots and, if you do, you can't look at all of them and you can only count them you can't inspect them for authenticity."
You're delusional. You ass and boot lick government and call yourself a winner. ha ha
Nice skip and jump their, Middler. Try a cartwheel now.You: Trump, Giuliani, Powell, Wood and Mike Lindell say it was a stolen election...so it was stolen.
Me: Trump's attorney general says there was no significant fraud. Trump's director of cyber security says there was no cyber hack of election hardware. Judges in over 60 lawsuits say there is no evidence in any of those cases that support allegations of significant fraud. Republican elections officials say there was no substantial fraud. The republican attempt at a "forensic" audit failed in AZ to show there was fraud.
You ass lick Trump and company and think you haven't lost....that is amusing.
Ah yes, yet another tactic to avoid admitting you are wrong.Do you get it now? Think about it if you don't. Then get back to me.