New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Nobody has standing according the statists to review ballots.

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You defend a closed election process where the Wizard of Oz declares the winner.
You approve of the election process when Trump won, but now think it is pretty f*cked up because he lost.

It is not a "closed process" because it is subject to oversight from county and state officials...not just precinct people. All 50 states have their own version of the process, but they are largely the same.

There are observers at every polling place, both from the state and from the parties. The audits are done be EAC certified auditors. The winner is declared by state officials in each state...not by the Wizard.
 

God of War

Governor
You approve of the election process when Trump won, but now think it is pretty f*cked up because he lost.
I have family that could vouch that I complain every election that the big cities delay in reporting is not acceptable going back decades. So, honestly, piss off.

Does the Wizard of Oz have acolytes or are you enrolled at Hogwarts an aspiring Wizard in your own right?
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member

middleview

President
Supporting Member
I have family that could vouch that I complain every election that the big cities delay in reporting is not acceptable going back decades. So, honestly, piss off.

Does the Wizard of Oz have acolytes or are you enrolled at Hogwarts an aspiring Wizard in your own right?
You did not complain after 2016...back when you were here as resident evil.

You have yet to produce credible evidence of any of your bullshit accusations about the election.
 

God of War

Governor
I suppose you don't know you are defeated in every election fraud thread you post in.
YOU: "Government said it was a fair so it was fair. You don't get to look at the ballots and, if you do, you can't look at all of them and you can only count them you can't inspect them for authenticity."

You're delusional. You ass and boot lick government and call yourself a winner. ha ha
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
YOU: "Government said it was a fair so it was fair. You don't get to look at the ballots and, if you do, you can't look at all of them and you can only count them you can't inspect them for authenticity."

You're delusional. You ass and boot lick government and call yourself a winner. ha ha
If you weren't so ignorant of election processes you'd understand how your allegation of ballots that were not authentic ballots is simply stupid.

Ballots are printed with serial numbers embedded in the qcode. If a ballot does not have a valid serial number it cannot be counted. If it is a duplicate ballot number it cannot be counted. In addition invalid numbers would trigger an investigation...there were no invalid serial numbers in any state.

Now...if you were right and somehow someone stole thousands of ballots in the battleground states and somehow marked them for a candidate...

If you tried to get them added to the mix as in person votes then the count of voters who went to the polls in person wouldn't match the number of ballots counted. They also would not match the poll books.

If you tried to introduce them as mail in ballots you'd have a problem with the serial number on the envelope. It would have to match the serial number of the ballot mailed out to a voter. If it did, then you have to worry about whether or not that voter already voted in person or by mail. You'd also have to make sure your signature on the envelope matches the signature on the voter registration.

You spend your time avoiding answering these points...effectively kissing Trump's ass.
 

EatTheRich

President
Can't tell the legitimacy difference between an elected representative body and unelected, biased, govt. booklicking, bureaucrats? Clearly a communist/nazi/fascist trait.
How are they an “elected representative body” if chosen in elections conducted by those you call “unelected, biased, govt. bootlicking, bureaucrats” in elections you claim are illegitimate?
 

God of War

Governor
If you weren't so ignorant of election processes you'd understand how your allegation of ballots that were not authentic ballots is simply stupid.

Ballots are printed with serial numbers embedded in the qcode. If a ballot does not have a valid serial number it cannot be counted. If it is a duplicate ballot number it cannot be counted. In addition invalid numbers would trigger an investigation...there were no invalid serial numbers in any state.

Now...if you were right and somehow someone stole thousands of ballots in the battleground states and somehow marked them for a candidate...

If you tried to get them added to the mix as in person votes then the count of voters who went to the polls in person wouldn't match the number of ballots counted. They also would not match the poll books.

If you tried to introduce them as mail in ballots you'd have a problem with the serial number on the envelope. It would have to match the serial number of the ballot mailed out to a voter. If it did, then you have to worry about whether or not that voter already voted in person or by mail. You'd also have to make sure your signature on the envelope matches the signature on the voter registration.

You spend your time avoiding answering these points...effectively kissing Trump's ass.
So you assert that anybody who gets a mail-in-ballot has a barcode across the top that in effect nullifies their anonymous vote?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
So you assert that anybody who gets a mail-in-ballot has a barcode across the top that in effect nullifies their anonymous vote?
If you have the hardware to read the barcode and you have access to the voter database, you could determine who that person voted for. At the first stage for mail in ballots the person to handle the envelope verifies that serial number & the voter name, address and signature. Then the envelope is passed to a cutter who seperates the envelope from the ballot. the ballot is then placed in a ballot carrier and when the carrier is full it is taken to the tabulators.

No. The vote is not nullified. The person validating the envelope does not have access to the ballot itself.
 

God of War

Governor
If you have the hardware to read the barcode and you have access to the voter database, you could determine who that person voted for. At the first stage for mail in ballots the person to handle the envelope verifies that serial number & the voter name, address and signature. Then the envelope is passed to a cutter who seperates the envelope from the ballot. the ballot is then placed in a ballot carrier and when the carrier is full it is taken to the tabulators.

No. The vote is not nullified. The person validating the envelope does not have access to the ballot itself.
Do you get it now? Think about it if you don't. Then get back to me.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
YOU: "Government said it was a fair so it was fair. You don't get to look at the ballots and, if you do, you can't look at all of them and you can only count them you can't inspect them for authenticity."

You're delusional. You ass and boot lick government and call yourself a winner. ha ha
You: Trump, Giuliani, Powell, Wood and Mike Lindell say it was a stolen election...so it was stolen.

Me: Trump's attorney general says there was no significant fraud. Trump's director of cyber security says there was no cyber hack of election hardware. Judges in over 60 lawsuits say there is no evidence in any of those cases that support allegations of significant fraud. Republican elections officials say there was no substantial fraud. The republican attempt at a "forensic" audit failed in AZ to show there was fraud.

You ass lick Trump and company and think you haven't lost....that is amusing.
 

God of War

Governor
You: Trump, Giuliani, Powell, Wood and Mike Lindell say it was a stolen election...so it was stolen.

Me: Trump's attorney general says there was no significant fraud. Trump's director of cyber security says there was no cyber hack of election hardware. Judges in over 60 lawsuits say there is no evidence in any of those cases that support allegations of significant fraud. Republican elections officials say there was no substantial fraud. The republican attempt at a "forensic" audit failed in AZ to show there was fraud.

You ass lick Trump and company and think you haven't lost....that is amusing.
Nice skip and jump their, Middler. Try a cartwheel now.
 
Top