New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

NYT apologizes for printing anti-American republican screed.

PNWest

America's BEST American: Impartial and Bipartisan

From the article:

James Bennet, the editor in charge of the opinion section, said in a meeting with staff members late in the day that he had not read the essay before it was published. Shortly afterward, The Times issued a statement saying the essay fell short of the newspaper’s standards.

That being the case - WHY DOES JAMES BENNET STILL HAVE A JOB? He's the editor of the opinion section. How could this moron allow something into print that calls on American military to attack innocent American people?
 

From the article:

James Bennet, the editor in charge of the opinion section, said in a meeting with staff members late in the day that he had not read the essay before it was published. Shortly afterward, The Times issued a statement saying the essay fell short of the newspaper’s standards.

That being the case - WHY DOES JAMES BENNET STILL HAVE A JOB? He's the editor of the opinion section. How could this moron allow something into print that calls on American military to attack innocent American people?
The Times has become a joke so pussywhipped by the fascist left, they have to apologize for their opinions. LOL! That paper is trash, and it's all yours. Enjoy!
 

BobbyT

Governor
Sooooo, you are of the opinion that our "Newspapers" opinion sections should only be allowed to print opinions you dems/libs approve of...…….., got it....
Nope. Our newspapers, if they set themselves to be reputable, should print opinions and, where those opinions are from Government officials and include obvious lies such as "cadres of left-wing radicals infiltrating," which is unsubstantiated, should include rebuttals to those lies.
 

UPNYA2

Mayor
Nope. Our newspapers, if they set themselves to be reputable, should print opinions and, where those opinions are from Government officials and include obvious lies such as "cadres of left-wing radicals infiltrating," which is unsubstantiated, should include rebuttals to those lies.
In your opinion.

But what about when "government officials" are dems and their opinions are "unsubstantiated", out right lies, like when some told us for years they had mounds of evidence that Trump was a puppet of Putin, a Russian agent? Anything anti-dems believed to be lies.

Shouldn't those be censored, rebuked or removed from public view too?

Or, once again, is that silly because everyone "knows" only libs really know which opinions ar facts as you all have expressed in the past?
 

BobbyT

Governor
In your opinion.

But what about when "government officials" are dems and their opinions are "unsubstantiated", out right lies, like when some told us for years they had mounds of evidence that Trump was a puppet of Putin, a Russian agent? Anything anti-dems believed to be lies.

Shouldn't those be censored, rebuked or removed from public view too?

Or, once again, is that silly because everyone "knows" only libs really know which opinions ar facts as you all have expressed in the past?
My answer is above and doesn't change with your whataboutism. I did not qualify Government official in any way, don't pretend I did.
 

reason10

Governor

From the article:

James Bennet, the editor in charge of the opinion section, said in a meeting with staff members late in the day that he had not read the essay before it was published. Shortly afterward, The Times issued a statement saying the essay fell short of the newspaper’s standards.

That being the case - WHY DOES JAMES BENNET STILL HAVE A JOB? He's the editor of the opinion section. How could this moron allow something into print that calls on American military to attack innocent American people?
In other words, the TREASON TIMES had to apologize to the few BROWNSHIRTS in New York for showing some impartiality.
 

JuliefromOhio

President
Supporting Member
George Conway has an op-ed in the Washington Post. No apologizing necessary.
Here's a snippet.

“Trump’s behavior is conscienceless, showing utter disregard for the safety of others, consistent irresponsibility, callousness, cynicism and disrespect of other human beings. Contempt for truth and honesty, and for norms, rules and laws. A complete inability to feel remorse, or guilt. As a New Yorker profile of Trump put it nearly a quarter-century ago, Trump lives ‘an existence unmolested by the rumbling of a soul.’ That’s Donald Trump’s problem yesterday, today and tomorrow.

“It’s our problem, too, for now: We remain governed by a soulless man with a broken mind. The damage will continue, and it won’t stop until voters end it. Come November, it will be up to the eligible human population of this country to look to their souls, their consciences, their humanity — and to cast their votes for one of their own,

George Conway's wife:
1591409059782.png
LOL
 
Last edited:
Top