The idea that we aren't pulling Zalensky's strings is preposterous. Anyone who suggests that is unserious.
Again, when "regime change" is the only option on the table, how do you think Putin is going to respond?
Only someone who wants the killing to continue takes the position you have here.
I remember studying in college a VERY KEY component of JFK’s
eventually successful navigation of the Cuban Missile Crisis vs. Kruschev. Know what it was? It was/is in nearly all of the textbooks. In a word, “magnanimity”. That precise term is leveraged time and again. The exit plan afforded some measure of dignity preservation enabling a bit of modest face-saving for the USSR - and specifically its leadership. Corner an egomaniacal hardliner and you can’t necessarily expect measured, rational response.
I’m not suggesting concessions necessarily and ceding territory - or anything like that. I am stating clearly here that matching Putin’s rhetorical bluster and chest-puffery (the way all of the folks here keep writing “unconditional blah, blah”, “immediate withdrawal and blah, blah…”) doesn’t help. In fact, these same internet know-it-alls went NUTS when GWB was “cowboying” things with all that “for or against us” “axis of evil” talk… and WE - the USA - were actually attacked in that one.
Now…every PJ lefty is a hybridized John Wayne, Clint Eastwood, and Rambo. Now that ISN’T “redneck swaggering” and “jingoistic xenophobic machismo”.
Just one more way JFK wouldn’t recognize Democrats.