OK. Biden to go against the constitution and nominate by Color rather than qualification

[EatTheRich]

Wow, Ginsberg was a white male? Who knew?

So it’s not unconstitutional to appoint a woman?

 

[Colorforms]

Pretty sure King called for a Black justice to be appointed.

I'm pretty sure he said "content of their character, not the color of their skin".

 

[PhilFish]

The list of qualifications from the Constitution.... anybody... anybody???

 

[EatTheRich]

I'm pretty sure he said "content of their character, not the color of their skin".

Right. Which is why he supported affirmative action so that whites would no longer be preferred over superior characters based on skin color.

 

[Colorforms]

The list of qualifications from the Constitution.... anybody... anybody???

I would refer you to the civil rights act and descrimination based on race, sex, or religion. Or is the government immune from the constitution?

 

[sensible don]

I'm pretty sure he said "content of their character, not the color of their skin".

You know MLK did over 150 speeches and spoke millions of words and these few words are the only ones right wingers know, amazing isn't it - the power of Fox News over them.

 

[Colorforms]

Right. Which is why he supported affirmative action so that whites would no longer be preferred over superior characters based on skin color.

And now you're going back to the "color of your skin" thing.

Just like a good ol pre-1950s democrat.

 

[Colorforms]

You know MLK did over 150 speeches and spoke millions of words and these few words are the only ones right wingers know, amazing isn't it - the power of Fox News over them.

So are they wrong? Tell me where MLK disavowed them.

 

[EatTheRich]

And now you're going back to the "color of your skin" thing.

Just like a good ol pre-1950s democrat.

Sounds to me as if you are attacking a nominee you know nothing about based solely on the color of her skin.

 

[Colorforms]

Sounds to me as if you are attacking a nominee you know nothing about based solely on the color of her skin.

Since their only criteria so far is the color of their skin, I don't have a problem with attacking blatant racism.

 

[Spamature]

The very thing the Supreme Court has ruled illegal. Yup. That's dems for ya.

None of the GOP picks were the most qualified.
One even committed perjury during his hearing and you still appointed him to the seat.

In short, you folks have shite to say about court picks that isn't full-blown hypocrisy.

 

[PhilFish]

I would refer you to the civil rights act and descrimination based on race, sex, or religion. Or is the government immune from the constitution?

What did you bleat about it last time around?

 

[Colorforms]

What did you bleat about it last time around?

When was the last time a president based his nomination strictly on sex and race?

 

[PhilFish]

When was the last time a president based his nomination strictly on sex and race?

Um.... strictly?? Cite it. Cite him saying he's only considering race..and race alone..

Or maybe cite him selecting random folk of the street ....er uh..ah...I mean random black folk of the street .....

 

[EatTheRich]

Since their only criteria so far is the color of their skin, I don't have a problem with attacking blatant racism.

Obviously it's not their only criterion. Did you think that Biden's pledge meant that he would grab any Black woman who happened to be available and nominate her to the court?

 

[Colorforms]

Obviously it's not their only criterion. Did you think that Biden's pledge meant that he would grab any Black woman who happened to be available and nominate her to the court?

What it meant was that if there was a qualified Hispanic, Asian, white, or any other race, they need not apply.

 

[EatTheRich]

What it meant was that if there was a qualified Hispanic, Asian, white, or any other race, they need not apply.

Right, because Biden made a pandering pledge to use race as one of his many political criteria for making this political decision.

 

[Colorforms]

Right, because Biden made a pandering pledge to use race as one of his many political criteria for making this political decision.

Race and sex, nothing about qualifications.

Considering his racist VP pick, qualifications clearly aren't high on his list of priorities.

 

[Jack4freedom]

You miss the point. Your phrase "no one of color" is yet another indication of Democrats' willingness to consider color in employment selection. The word color shouldn't even be mentioned, or even thought about. Qualification should be the only criterea, and whoever is best qualifed, they should be selected.

(4) Democrats Oblivious To Their Rampant Racism/Sexism | PoliticalJack.com

Sean Hannity said that it may very well be “illegal” for Biden to nominate a black woman for the SCOTUS. Hannuity has always been a barely literate moron. Are you backing his assertion? Lol

 

[EatTheRich]

Race and sex, nothing about qualifications.

Considering his racist VP pick, qualifications clearly aren't High on his list of priorities.

I mean, her place on the ticket won him the election and she’s a damn sight better than Mike Pence …

IF he nominates someone you consider unqualified, you can take it up then. But to ASSUME someone won’t be qualified because she is a Black woman is dumb.