EatTheRich
President
So it’s not unconstitutional to appoint a woman?Wow, Ginsberg was a white male? Who knew?
So it’s not unconstitutional to appoint a woman?Wow, Ginsberg was a white male? Who knew?
I'm pretty sure he said "content of their character, not the color of their skin".Pretty sure King called for a Black justice to be appointed.
Right. Which is why he supported affirmative action so that whites would no longer be preferred over superior characters based on skin color.I'm pretty sure he said "content of their character, not the color of their skin".
I would refer you to the civil rights act and descrimination based on race, sex, or religion. Or is the government immune from the constitution?The list of qualifications from the Constitution.... anybody... anybody???
You know MLK did over 150 speeches and spoke millions of words and these few words are the only ones right wingers know, amazing isn't it - the power of Fox News over them.I'm pretty sure he said "content of their character, not the color of their skin".
And now you're going back to the "color of your skin" thing.Right. Which is why he supported affirmative action so that whites would no longer be preferred over superior characters based on skin color.
So are they wrong? Tell me where MLK disavowed them.You know MLK did over 150 speeches and spoke millions of words and these few words are the only ones right wingers know, amazing isn't it - the power of Fox News over them.
Sounds to me as if you are attacking a nominee you know nothing about based solely on the color of her skin.And now you're going back to the "color of your skin" thing.
Just like a good ol pre-1950s democrat.
Since their only criteria so far is the color of their skin, I don't have a problem with attacking blatant racism.Sounds to me as if you are attacking a nominee you know nothing about based solely on the color of her skin.
None of the GOP picks were the most qualified.The very thing the Supreme Court has ruled illegal. Yup. That's dems for ya.
What did you bleat about it last time around?I would refer you to the civil rights act and descrimination based on race, sex, or religion. Or is the government immune from the constitution?
When was the last time a president based his nomination strictly on sex and race?What did you bleat about it last time around?
Um.... strictly?? Cite it. Cite him saying he's only considering race..and race alone..When was the last time a president based his nomination strictly on sex and race?
Obviously it's not their only criterion. Did you think that Biden's pledge meant that he would grab any Black woman who happened to be available and nominate her to the court?Since their only criteria so far is the color of their skin, I don't have a problem with attacking blatant racism.
What it meant was that if there was a qualified Hispanic, Asian, white, or any other race, they need not apply.Obviously it's not their only criterion. Did you think that Biden's pledge meant that he would grab any Black woman who happened to be available and nominate her to the court?
Right, because Biden made a pandering pledge to use race as one of his many political criteria for making this political decision.What it meant was that if there was a qualified Hispanic, Asian, white, or any other race, they need not apply.
Race and sex, nothing about qualifications.Right, because Biden made a pandering pledge to use race as one of his many political criteria for making this political decision.
Sean Hannity said that it may very well be “illegal” for Biden to nominate a black woman for the SCOTUS. Hannuity has always been a barely literate moron. Are you backing his assertion? LolYou miss the point. Your phrase "no one of color" is yet another indication of Democrats' willingness to consider color in employment selection. The word color shouldn't even be mentioned, or even thought about. Qualification should be the only criterea, and whoever is best qualifed, they should be selected.
(4) Democrats Oblivious To Their Rampant Racism/Sexism | PoliticalJack.com
I mean, her place on the ticket won him the election and she’s a damn sight better than Mike Pence …Race and sex, nothing about qualifications.
Considering his racist VP pick, qualifications clearly aren't High on his list of priorities.