Raise your hand if you want your tax dollars spent on a Lunar nuclear reactor . . .

[Spamature]

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjD_P3-k7D0AhW1PH0KHb29Ap4QFnoECAMQAQ&url=https://www.sotaventogalicia.com/en/proyectos/non-toxic-biodegradable-and-renewable-lubricants-for-wind-turbines/&usg=AOvVaw3pitk2nuFY2_zrIczY16Fl

I can see that is a natural reflex to protect your own psyche to answer in a completely obtuse manner. Clearly I'm asking you why do you implicitly trust vaccinologists but not an aerospace engineers or a nuclear engineers, right? You think there is a difference between them in trustworthiness? Why? Someone tell you vaccines are more intrinsically safe? On what basis?

I don't trust them with a biological weapon.
I do trust them to help us counter a virus.

I trust aerospace engineers
I don't trust them with nuclear material.

I trust nuclear engineers.
I don't trust them with rockets.

I don't trust civil engineers with build nuclear power plants near me.
But I do trust them to build the freeways and non-nuclear containment buildings.