New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Rep Jim Jordan has nothing to hide...but

RickWA

Senator
By the way....nobody is saying Jordan is guilty of anything, but he is clearly attempting to hide evidence.
“And Jordan was to be on the committee...yeah right. Hey Mr. Dillinger..help us investigate this bank robbery.”

Yes, Dillinger was innocent. Infer no preemptive assessment of guilt or perjorative whatsoever.

Go ahead, dance. It’s all you guys do. Tell me how this was intended only to make the point that a person “potentially” involved in criminal activity ought not be in on the investigation… because that IS the dance you will try next. The infamous evil and historically saturation of knowledge of guilt is merely coincidental.

Differing standards-by-party. Always.

So sick of dishonesty. Have a nice day.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
Is this like the “evidence” you and Bugsy demand in your direct attestation to Jordan’s guilt above in this very strand? Is it that sort of standard of evidence before declaring guilt?

Good Lord, the blinding, shameless, idiotic hackery at every turn. Bad.Faith.Posting.
That post re-write was particularly lame.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
YOU and BUGSY established Jordan’s guilt in this strand above. You then demanded proof from another poster regarding her statement about Pelosi. There will be no lefty slither allowed here.

You are once again BUSTED for having two differing standards of evidence for Democrats and non-Democrats. Every d*mned day it’s the same thing. You guys are simple, dishonest internet hacks. Read your own words. Don’t blame me for your horrible duplicity. You are the ones who commit this stuff to writing.

Enjoy your unbending advocacy. I don’t care. We get crap pols because you guys enable crap pols - and both parties’ adherents do this. Frankly, there should be no such thing as “party adherent”. It should be good citizen stewardship, meted out on a case-by-case basis. That’s not happening though - just thoughtless partisanship and unconditional loyalty/advocacy.

You guys have fun.
Jordan admitted he spoke to the president before and during the riot.

There is no evidence that Pelosi refused national guard troops.

That is the bottom line. Jordan, buy refusing to testify is concealing evidence.

How you can make your argument with a straight face is beyond me....do you even get a giggle out of your partisan trolling? You crack me up.
 
Last edited:

Bugsy McGurk

President
Jordan admitted he spoke to the president before and during the riot.

There is no evidence that Pelosi refused national guard troops.

That is the bottom line. Jordan, but refusing to testify is concealing evidence.

How you can make your argument with a straight face is beyond me....do you even get a giggle out of your partisan trolling? You crack me up.
Their Pelosi angle amounts to bank robbers defending themselves by saying the bank should have had better security.

So lame.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
“And Jordan was to be on the committee...yeah right. Hey Mr. Dillinger..help us investigate this bank robbery.”

Yes, Dillinger was innocent. Infer no preemptive assessment of guilt or perjorative whatsoever.

Go ahead, dance. It’s all you guys do. Tell me how this was intended only to make the point that a person “potentially” involved in criminal activity ought not be in on the investigation… because that IS the dance you will try next. The infamous evil and historically saturation of knowledge of guilt is merely coincidental.

Differing standards-by-party. Always.

So sick of dishonesty. Have a nice day.
Hilarious....so you think I was accusing Jordan of a Crime because of the reference to Dillinger? Jordan would have attempted to derail the committee to protect Trump.
Why else would he refuse to answer questions?

Your line of reasoning here is to now insist that all of the members of congress have to testify of their communication with anyone related to the riot because you just don't know what you might find....pretty much what the republicans were hoping to do when they insisted that the investigation include the riots of the summer of 2020....Let's subpoena Pelosi and see who she talked to...Hey Nancy...did you get any phone calls during the riot? You know...those guys driving the National Guard trucks...did you give them directions to the Capitol? Is that why they took 4 hours to get there?

If you know the investigation will hurt Trump....derail it.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
Hilarious....so you think I was accusing Jordan of a Crime because of the reference to Dillinger? Jordan would have attempted to derail the committee to protect Trump.
Why else would he refuse to answer questions?

Your line of reasoning here is to now insist that all of the members of congress have to testify of their communication with anyone related to the riot because you just don't know what you might find....pretty much what the republicans were hoping to do when they insisted that the investigation include the riots of the summer of 2020....Let's subpoena Pelosi and see who she talked to...Hey Nancy...did you get any phone calls during the riot? You know...those guys driving the National Guard trucks...did you give them directions to the Capitol? Is that why they took 4 hours to get there?

If you know the investigation will hurt Trump....derail it.
No one knows whether Jordan committed a Crime unless he reveals what he did and said. He knows that, so he stonewalls. Which is just the way Trump cultists like it.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Their Pelosi angle amounts to bank robbers defending themselves by saying the bank should have had better security.

So lame.
So I guess we really need investigations into the police in every city where there were riots in 2020 to determine why they didn't prevent them.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Pelosi needs to be subpoenaed as well as her communications with the sergeant at arms and any military advisors and the mayor. Why did she and the mayor deny the National guard when it was offered before Jan. 6th?
Why wouldn't you want to subpoena McConnell? The senate sergeant at arms reported to him....
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
They don’t even try to hide their hackery.

Indeed, they even seem proud of it.

;-)
They certainly are spending a lot more time trying to avoid any real evaluation of the damage Trump did....

I wonder if they think we need to investigate the fire fighters in Boulder to determine why they didn't prevent the fire...
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
YOU and BUGSY established Jordan’s guilt in this strand above. You then demanded proof from another poster regarding her statement about Pelosi. There will be no lefty slither allowed here.

You are once again BUSTED for having two differing standards of evidence for Democrats and non-Democrats. Every d*mned day it’s the same thing. You guys are simple, dishonest internet hacks. Read your own words. Don’t blame me for your horrible duplicity. You are the ones who commit this stuff to writing.

Enjoy your unbending advocacy. I don’t care. We get crap pols because you guys enable crap pols - and both parties’ adherents do this. Frankly, there should be no such thing as “party adherent”. It should be good citizen stewardship, meted out on a case-by-case basis. That’s not happening though - just thoughtless partisanship and unconditional loyalty/advocacy.

You guys have fun.
While both parties have their faults, I have never seen such complicity as with the Trump version of the RNC. How can they be so intimidated as to go along with the lies?
How is it they are so indebted to Trump that so few are willing to stand up and say enough...and stick to it. Lindsey Graham did and then backed down. Cruz called it correctly and then hurriedly change his tune. McConnell and McCarthy both told the truth when they said Trump owned the insurrection...and then changed their minds.

Does Trump have pictures of them in bed with little boys?

I have not accused Jordan of a Crime. I have accused him of participating in a cover up.
 
They say they didn’t do anything wrong. They say Trump didn’t do anything wrong. Yet they won’t say what happened.

It’s almost like they’re lying or something.

;-)
Why We Don't Tell Five-Year-Olds That There Is No Santa Claus

In Liberalese, "lying" means not surrendering to aggressive rhetorical tyranny. People have to earn the right to be told the truth.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Why We Don't Tell Five-Year-Olds That There Is No Santa Claus

In Liberalese, "lying" means not surrendering to aggressive rhetorical tyranny. People have to earn the right to be told the truth.
So when Trump says Washington's troops won the war by attacking British airports...he isn't lying he is resisting aggressive rhetorical tyranny.

Wow. When you put it like that it makes all the sense in the world....

Of course, I'm actually lying...it makes no sense...but do carry on.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
No one knows whether Jordan committed a Crime unless he reveals what he did and said. He knows that, so he stonewalls. Which is just the way Trump cultists like it.
but he is not pleading the 5th. He is protecting Trump. He has no right to executive priveledge...so on what grounds can he ignore a subpoena?
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
but he is not pleading the 5th. He is protecting Trump. He has no right to executive priveledge...so on what grounds can he ignore a subpoena?
Trump and his cabal don’t think they need grounds. They can just be lawless. Being lawless is Trump’s stock-in-trade, especially when covering up his crimes. Which makes his cultists clap like trained seals.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Trump and his cabal don’t think they need grounds. They can just be lawless. Being lawless is Trump’s stock-in-trade, especially when covering up his crimes. Which makes his cultists clap like trained seals.
They are counting on the short attention span of the base. If they can bury the 1/6 investigation before summer they think they will get a lot of seats in congress. If the results are an indictment of Trump or any of his mob in September or October it could make for a defeat for a bunch of the pro-Trump repubs.
 
Top