New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Rittenhouse is the line in the sand.

Gamewell45

Council Member
You need to be more complete.

You need to explain how you don't defend acts of pedohilia (or what have you) but realize how broken people can be the victims of their circumstances such as youth, exposure to violence, and exposure to sexual abuse that in turn turns a victim into a perpetrator themselves. That the reason the law prohibits character assassination in court, whether warranted or not, mars justice for rather clear reasons. But then you have to concede that people must quickly age out of bad behavior or be incarcerated or institutionalized for decades if not life to break that cycle.

@Dawg
I'm not sure what you mean in the first question; could you possibly clarify it so I can properly answer it?
 

EatTheRich

President
Thanks but no thanks. Not interested in that communist authoritarian shit for one second. We need to refund the police, build mental institutions (rehabs), and new government run prisons. Need to be ready in case the criminality and violence trend starts to look like the 60's through mid 90's again.
So to you ordinary people policing themselves is more “authoritarian” than the government of a hostile ruling class policing ordinary people.
 

EatTheRich

President
No. Moving on is what has cost conservatives their values to be represented in society. The Left loves when the Right "moves on" because they certainly don't. Those that character assassinated Kyle need to be held accountable publicly or they'll do it again and again. To encourage Kyle to follow through and support the effort is what NOT moving on means.
This proves that for you the case isn’t about a scared kid who was wrongly charged … it is about an organized movement to repress free speech of which Rittenhouse was a soldier.
 

EatTheRich

President
That is a fuckking LIE. The weapon he carried WAS LEGAL, or the goose stepping prosecution would have included illegal carry in the charges.

His parents RAISED HIM RIGHT. He LEGALLY defending himself and took out the trash. And he saved the lives of the future victims of the scumbags he LEGALLY killed.

That's what bothers you the most. The jury agrees with the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. What Rittenhouse did was LEGAL.

It was the right thing. And if more of those store owners met those animals with LEGAL AR-15s and started blasting away last summer, the gene pool of America would have been greatly improved.
Which clause of the Constitution contains the right to kill people you personally consider to be trash?
 

God of War

Governor
This proves that for you the case isn’t about a scared kid who was wrongly charged … it is about an organized movement to repress free speech of which Rittenhouse was a soldier.
When the case is DONE then life goes on. The boy is hopefully going to be okay. And made whole as the legal rhetoric calls it.
 
Top