New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Roger Stone Will Get a Mistrial Thanks to Tomeka Hart

So you would expect a fair outcome of an Obama associate trial- had say a republican Obama hater on their Jury ?

Spare us the partisan dismissal. You would have cried like a baby.
Well maybe if one of your star prosecutors would actually bring a case against one of these Obama fiends, we will find out. Unfortunately, all Trump, Sessions, Barr, Horowitz and Durham have brought to the table is a bunch of hot air and libelous sliming of former FBI personnel for inter departmental infractions.

Say what you want about Mueller and his team but they sure as hell were able to get actual indictments which have produced actual convictions and threw some of Trump’s ASSociates into actual jails. For all the years Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all you experts here bloviating from the cheap, cheap seats nothing of substance has been produced. Tweets from Trump and stale rancid farts from you and your cohorts here is all I’ve seen so far. Get back to me when Barr actually convicts one of these people. Otherwise you are just pissing into the wind.
 
Well maybe if one of your star prosecutors would actually bring a case against one of these Obama fiends, we will find out. Unfortunately, all Trump, Sessions, Barr, Horowitz and Durham have brought to the table is a bunch of hot air and libelous sliming of former FBI personnel for inter departmental infractions.

Say what you want about Mueller and his team but they sure as hell were able to get actual indictments which have produced actual convictions and threw some of Trump’s ASSociates into actual jails. For all the years Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all you experts here bloviating from the cheap, cheap seats nothing of substance has been produced. Tweets from Trump and stale rancid farts from you and your cohorts here is all I’ve seen so far. Get back to me when Barr actually convicts one of these people. Otherwise you are just pissing into the wind.
What's Nutty is fecklessly attempting a hypothetical whataboutist if-the-shoe-was-on-the-other-foot-what-would-I-think-it-was argument.

I'll have ta go with you on this one.
 
We don't have an aristocracy. That's a Democrat fantasy, where the Clintons are royalty, and their subjects beg for handouts like land, homes, food, and transportation.

When the wealthy are allowed to sex traffic a society's children, and it is publicly known yet not acted upon, you have an aristocracy. We have an aristocracy, clearly - and in front of the entire world - we tolerate a class beyond your/our so called "nation of laws" rhetoric. We have an illusion that we don't have an aristocracy, and yes many are quite vested in the illusion.

Whatever your definition is, is irrelevant to me.

No pedophile Allan Dershowitz squegalese alters that objective reality.

Just like Bonnie Prince Andy got away with it.
 
Great, all I have to do to get out of jury duty is show them my political writings.
Can I request no Trump voters be on my jury seeing as they aren't my peers.
 

TBLee

Mayor
Great, all I have to do to get out of jury duty is show them my political writings.
Can I request no Trump voters be on my jury seeing as they aren't my peers.
Basically, you are not too far off. Having served on several jury's and also having been eliminated from several jury's (because of honest answers), if you are biased and already formed an opinion about the case, then you should not serve as a juror on that case. With the proper questions being asked, and also answered honestly, then one should be open minded to the prosecution as well as the defense of each individual case.
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
Well maybe if one of your star prosecutors would actually bring a case against one of these Obama fiends, we will find out. Unfortunately, all Trump, Sessions, Barr, Horowitz and Durham have brought to the table is a bunch of hot air and libelous sliming of former FBI personnel for inter departmental infractions.

Say what you want about Mueller and his team but they sure as hell were able to get actual indictments which have produced actual convictions and threw some of Trump’s ASSociates into actual jails. For all the years Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all you experts here bloviating from the cheap, cheap seats nothing of substance has been produced. Tweets from Trump and stale rancid farts from you and your cohorts here is all I’ve seen so far. Get back to me when Barr actually convicts one of these people. Otherwise you are just pissing into the wind.

You sound mad. LOL Ooooo Mueller was able to get 10 year old Tax fraud cases and throw old men in jail for it. Totally unrelated to 2016 and Russia lol Yawn.

Sorry. FBI and CIA intentionally setting up and Leaking, FISA courts issuing warrants in regard to unverified info regarding the Chief Executive - is hardly an "inter departmental infraction"

Whew such legal prowess !!
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
You sound mad. LOL Ooooo Mueller was able to get 10 year old Tax fraud cases and throw old men in jail for it. Totally unrelated to 2016 and Russia lol Yawn.

Sorry. FBI and CIA intentionally setting up and Leaking, FISA courts issuing warrants in regard to unverified info regarding the Chief Executive - is hardly an "inter departmental infraction"

Whew such legal prowess !!
In Trumplandia, the brainwashed zombies refer to convictions of senior Trump aides for lying about their dealings with Kremlin reps in 2016 as “10 year old tax fraud cases” that are “unrelated to 2016 and Russia.”
 

Winston

Do you feel lucky, Punk
Did they not bother to interview her or do a basic background check, or was this just another corrupt DNC play?
She had to answer the question "can you be impartial" which in retrospect is clearly a lie. That said she should be arrested herself for perjury
 
Basically, you are not too far off. Having served on several jury's and also having been eliminated from several jury's (because of honest answers), if you are biased and already formed an opinion about the case, then you should not serve as a juror on that case. With the proper questions being asked, and also answered honestly, then one should be open minded to the prosecution as well as the defense of each individual case.
Yea, I don't buy that having an pre-formed opinion of Trump means you have an pre-formed opinion of Stone.
 
Top