New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Sanders: The Perfect Democrat; and Why he will lose

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
Wow, I struck a nerve!! LMAO.

Didn’t you say that Clinton’s economy was due to an R Congress? The hypocrisy runs deep on both sides. I knew somebody would walk right into my trap, thanks for not letting me down. :)
Wasn't responding to you :) Sorry
Thanks for the attention though ! woot woot !!!!
 
Yes, it is. It was originally coined as an insult and continues to be used as such today. Because National Socialism is so widely misunderstood and reflexively maligned, and because "NAZI" was co-opted by violent thugs, followers of true National Socialism try to avoid the term.


True. Doesn't negate my original point.

So it's as i said; the majority of economists expect the economy to keep growing for some time. A recession before the elections is unlikely; a severe crash, less likely.


True.

False. NS, despite communists' never-ending labeling of everything they don't like as capitalist, isn't capitalist. All functioning large economies balance economic freedom with controls. Capitalism and Communism both get it wrong, and with negative consequences not just for the working folks' physical but also spiritual well-being. Both seek to control. NS seeks to nurture.

One can only call NS capitalist if one labels any degree of economic freedom -- which NS has -- as "capitalist."

True. Also true under a guided economy, such as advocated by NS. Communism suppresses all economic freedom and eradicates the individual rewards of it. The collective is all and all are brought to lowest common point. NS, by contrast, permits economic freedom and the rewards of it, constraining and managing it all for the good of the people and nation. Much of US law is supposed to do the same but doesn't because government is in the hands of capital and the masters of it rather than in the hands of the people.


How so?


To some, poorly implemented, degree. Less with socialism, really, than with fascism.

Well said, btw, "endogenous malfeasance."


and not a bad thing...

Nah, by those who chose for it to happen ... unless we the people make it otherwise.
When you see the people get up for anything, do let me know, k?
 

reason10

Mayor
It's a public forum. If you're going to get angry about somebody jumping in and educating you, consider sending a private message.

Woot woot (man that ages you, haha). ;)
There has never been an instance when a liberal has ever educated a taxpayer about ANYTHING. You people are just not very smart.

Look at the IDIOTS you voted for.
 

reason10

Mayor
Actually we bailed out capitalism recently with socialism to save capitalism from its own endogenous malfeasance.
Nobody bails out capitalism any more than one bails out a tornado.

(To educate that small mind of yours) Capitalism is a force of nature. It exists whether you like it or not. Socialism only raises the cost of capitalism, concentrates wealth at the top and enslave everyone else.

Only a total edited would want socialism.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

now_what

Mayor
Supporting Member
There has never been an instance when a liberal has ever educated a taxpayer about ANYTHING. You people are just not very smart.

Look at the IDIOTS you voted for.
You’re angry. I understand. But I sure pay a lot of taxes, so i guess I’m both of the people in your example. : )
 

Nutty Cortez

Dummy (D) NY
There has never been an instance when a liberal has ever educated a taxpayer about ANYTHING. You people are just not very smart.

Look at the IDIOTS you voted for.

They aren't. It's how we keep them well behaved :)
Ironic that the dumbest among my liberal base are educators- all because of a union :)
 

reason10

Mayor
You’re angry. I understand. But I sure pay a lot of taxes, so i guess I’m both of the people in your example. : )
I'm not angry. I'm not a Democrat. My candidate is going to win and the Edited are going to lose control of the House.

You're the one backing the candidates who want to raise taxes on the middle class, take away jobs, cars, planes, and freedom, after edited the American economy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Buttigieg would be the easiest for Trump to beat. Gay, a technocrat, arrogant preppie, just the sort for Trump to make his punching bag. Sanders is probably too far-left to win, but enough Americans support him he’ll probably win the nomination. But if they want someone who will be able to beat Trump, their best choice is Warren.
Buttigieg is Beto 2.0. He's so fake it almost literally drips from the side of his mouth when he "smiles:"

Screenshot 2020-02-15 at 8.45.04 AM.png

He's a soulless automaton who probably has no idea what he actually believes. Rhodes Scholar? Check! Harvard grad? Check! Military service? Check! McKinsey consulting gig? Check! This guy has been running for President his entire life. That people would vote for a guy like that should scare the shit out of us...
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Sanders is indeed the "perfect democrat" - the culmination of all that they have been working for since the earliest progressives 100 years ago - "fundamentally transforming" the country into a Marxist hell hole.
 

now_what

Mayor
Supporting Member
I'm not angry. I'm not a Democrat. My candidate is going to win and the Edited are going to lose control of the House.

You're the one backing the candidates who want to raise taxes on the middle class, take away jobs, cars, planes, and freedom, after edited the American economy.
“I’m not angry....edit edit edit....”. Lol

I heard around here in 2018 that the dems were running on nothing and couldn’t win. Right before the house got ripped from you. :)

We will see...
 
If you don't like America, LEAVE.

Period. End of discussion.

Move to CUBA, a communist paradise/shithole.
Out of your jurisdiction pard, you have a rather exaggerated sense of self importance. There is no discussion you're in on regarding where anyone goes or lives; especially someone so ill informed.

Cuba Ailing? Not Its Biomedical Industry

Cuban cancer vaccine to be tested in U.S. sparks a new scientific bond

Cuba’s extraordinary global medical record shames the US blockade

Who is more socialistcommie than America who saved its "capitalist" economic system, again, with socialism as recently as 2007-08? Cuba has a better healthcare system than you do.

I have a pick up truck. 'Bout time for a new set of tires and an oil change. Don't mean I don't like the truck, it means the truck will require some responsibility on my part in looking after it. You'll never ride in it.
 
Buttigieg is Beto 2.0. He's so fake it almost literally drips from the side of his mouth when he "smiles:"

View attachment 48460

He's a soulless automaton who probably has no idea what he actually believes. Rhodes Scholar? Check! Harvard grad? Check! Military service? Check! McKinsey consulting gig? Check! This guy has been running for President his entire life. That people would vote for a guy like that should scare the shit out of us...
As we've seen, the power structure will send us a half black guy, a woman, a gay guy, a woman of color, nay bother, the snake has many skins to shed.
 

EatTheRich

President
Yes, it is. It was originally coined as an insult and continues to be used as such today. Because National Socialism is so widely misunderstood and reflexively maligned, and because "NAZI" was co-opted by violent thugs, followers of true National Socialism try to avoid the term.


True. Doesn't negate my original point.

So it's as i said; the majority of economists expect the economy to keep growing for some time. A recession before the elections is unlikely; a severe crash, less likely.


True.

False. NS, despite communists' never-ending labeling of everything they don't like as capitalist, isn't capitalist. All functioning large economies balance economic freedom with controls. Capitalism and Communism both get it wrong, and with negative consequences not just for the working folks' physical but also spiritual well-being. Both seek to control. NS seeks to nurture.

One can only call NS capitalist if one labels any degree of economic freedom -- which NS has -- as "capitalist."

True. Also true under a guided economy, such as advocated by NS. Communism suppresses all economic freedom and eradicates the individual rewards of it. The collective is all and all are brought to lowest common point. NS, by contrast, permits economic freedom and the rewards of it, constraining and managing it all for the good of the people and nation. Much of US law is supposed to do the same but doesn't because government is in the hands of capital and the masters of it rather than in the hands of the people.


How so?


To some, poorly implemented, degree. Less with socialism, really, than with fascism.

Well said, btw, "endogenous malfeasance."


and not a bad thing...

Nah, by those who chose for it to happen ... unless we the people make it otherwise.
Capitalism=rule by the bourgeoisie
Socialism=rule by the proletariat

Nazis stand for rule by the bourgeoisie, they are bankrolled by the bourgeoisie and their historic mission is to crush the proletariat so as to secure the rule of the bourgeoisie. They are capitalists.
 
Top