New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Should the new anti-Covid pills be reserved for the unvaccinated?

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
Back of the line. Anyone who is medically eligible to be vaccinated and refuses to do so should be at the very back of the line when it comes to doling out limited supplies.

The reason for doing this is not to be punitive but to use these limited resources where they will do the most good. Giving these medicines to people who refuse to be vaccinated will only insure that they go out and prolong the pandemic.

Additionally if it turns out that there is enough medicine available to treat the unvaccinated the medicines should only be given out in conjunction with a single dose vaccine such as the J&J. This will help prevent the spread of the disease.
The J&J vaccine was the least effective of the 3 Pfizer, Moderna and J&J, so Why the J&J?
 

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
You don’t know anything about vaccines. You should show humility and ask that it be explained to you.
Explain, how the vaccinated need paxlovid if the vaccines work?

Why weren't the other three enough?

Why you suggest punishing people who don't do as you say?

What are your medical degrees?
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
You know the answer, no need to ask stupid questions.
If the vaccine doesn't protect you enough to keep you from needing the therapeutics, then why the f*ck are we bothering to get vaccinated? You guys are being either disingenuous or stupid here - which is it?
 
If the vaccine doesn't protect you enough to keep you from needing the therapeutics, then why the f*ck are we bothering to get vaccinated? You guys are being either disingenuous or stupid here - which is it?
Yep, you don't listen or learn from the answers that have been provided numerous times. I don't think you any capacity to respond directly to an argument.
Just recite the same nonsense like a parrot.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
Yep, you don't listen or learn from the answers that have been provided numerous times. I don't think you any capacity to respond directly to an argument.
Just recite the same nonsense like a parrot.
There’s just no way they’re too stupid to absorb what they’ve been told dozens of times.

Or…are they?

;-)
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Yes. And in this forum all day, every day. I was always a conservative among liberals. Now, I find that conservatives are the “liberals” and the “liberals” are illiberal leftist statists. Empowerment of the central state animates their every movement. And, certainly, advocacy and concern for fellow humans - for them - has become remarkably CONDITIONAL.
Indeed, the "we're not fascists" left is all in on bureaucratic mandates, censorship, political indoctrination of youths, and criminalizing the political opposition, all the while telling us WE'RE the "neo-fascists." They are either gaslighting us or they have no clue what fascism actually looks like.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Yep, you don't listen or learn from the answers that have been provided numerous times. I don't think you any capacity to respond directly to an argument.
Just recite the same nonsense like a parrot.
LOL! There is no acceptable "answer" to my question, other than the truth - you don't need therapeutics if the vaccinations work. All the "nonsense" is in your side of this argument.
 
LOL! There is no acceptable "answer" to my question, other than the truth - you don't need therapeutics if the vaccinations work. All the "nonsense" is in your side of this argument.
You are misrepresenting what "works" mean. Because you aren't listening or you are just straight up a liar. Stupid or dishonest, either way it reflects extremely poorly on you.
 

RickWA

Senator
Indeed, the "we're not fascists" left is all in on bureaucratic mandates, censorship, political indoctrination of youths, and criminalizing the political opposition, all the while telling us WE'RE the "neo-fascists." They are either gaslighting us or they have no clue what fascism actually looks like.
Liars lie. It’s just that simple. They know who and what they are, and they know what they are doing. They’ve simply taken the philosophy of activist-interventionist state and bolted on massive coercion. Collectivism is THAT important to them.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
If you were smart you wouldn’t think a vaccine “doesn’t work” if it’s not 100% effective. You should trust me and stop saying such dopey things.
If you were smart, you'd know that if it doesn't keep enough recipients from needing therapeutics to keep from dying that you have to withhold any and all supply from the unvaccinated in order to keep up with demand from the vaccinated, that's a pretty good prima facie case that it's not working as advertised.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Liars lie. It’s just that simple. They know who and what they are, and they know what they are doing. They’ve simply taken the philosophy of activist-interventionist state and bolted on massive coercion. Collectivism is THAT important to them.
It certainly seems authoritarianism is always ALWAYS required (eventually) to make Marxism a viable ruling doctrine. You'd think if it was as great as they tell us, they wouldn't need facsism to make it "work."
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
If you were smart, you'd know that if it doesn't keep enough recipients from needing therapeutics to keep from dying that you have to withhold any and all supply from the unvaccinated in order to keep up with demand from the vaccinated, that's a pretty good prima facie case that it's not working as advertised.
Nope. Two different questions…

1. Is the vaccine 100% in preventing serious disease? No. Close, but not 100%.

2. Should the unvaccinated get a preference for Plaxovid? No.

Is this sinking in?
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
It certainly seems authoritarianism is always ALWAYS required (eventually) to make Marxism a viable ruling doctrine. You'd think if it was as great as they tell us, they wouldn't need facsism to make it "work."
Oh jeez, some really dopey dittoing has begun.

;-)
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Nope. Two different questions…

1. Is the vaccine 100% in preventing serious disease? No. Close, but not 100%.

2. Should the unvaccinated get a preference for Plaxovid? No.

Is this sinking in?
Who ever said the unvaxxed should get "preference?" Only that they should get equal access - you know, like the Hippocratic Oath (and the Constitution) requires.
 
Top