Skelator has nothing to say about the Durham report.

[middleview]

Only, we now find out they didn't hack the DNC.

Quick...call Donald.

Trump: It was probably Russia that hacked the DNC, Clinton campaign

Trump: It was probably Russia that hacked the DNC, Clinton campaign | CSO Online

 

[Alinvegas]

You found that out where? Qanon?

How US cybersleuths decided Russia hacked the DNC
Digital clues led security pros to agencies in Putin's government. It's as close as we'll ever get to proof that Russia did it.

How cybersleuths decided Russia was behind US election hack - CNET

Posted May 3, 2017. Get with the times will ya...

 

[middleview]

You are ignoring how well it "clearly" supported Hillary Clinton's efforts to frame Trump. Now that we know about her efforts in that endeavor without a doubt, it changes everything (and renders all your postings on the matter utter bullsh*t).

"Without a doubt"? The FBI agents working on Crossfire did not see the Steele dossier until months after the investigation started.

Did people working on the Trump campaign meet with or contact Russian officials in about 100 or so instances? Did Flynn get $35,000 to fly to Moscow and have dinner with Putin? Did Manafort share internal polling data with a Russian agent?

Durham's report changes nothing. His opinions were dictated to him by Trump. His assembled "facts" do not make his opinions any more credible. The very fact that he completely failed to prove any illegal acts by anyone in the FBI or the Clinton campaign seems to escape you.

 

[middleview]

Posted May 3, 2017. Get with the times will ya...

What do you have that refutes that article?

 

[Raoul_Luke]

"Without a doubt"? The FBI agents working on Crossfire did not see the Steele dossier until months after the investigation started.

Did people working on the Trump campaign meet with or contact Russian officials in about 100 or so instances? Did Flynn get $35,000 to fly to Moscow and have dinner with Putin? Did Manafort share internal polling data with a Russian agent?

Durham's report changes nothing. His opinions were dictated to him by Trump. His assembled "facts" do not make his opinions any more credible. The very fact that he completely failed to prove any illegal acts by anyone in the FBI or the Clinton campaign seems to escape you.

And again, the idea that none of that information found its way via the Ohrs into the ears of the investigators is just silly.

All extremely and, well, obviously legal.

As long as none of the conspirators put their true intentions in writing or on tape, how could he "prove" the conspiracy existed. His findings suggest an obvious conspiracy, which you, being the hack you are, deny. Nothing to see here, move along...

 

[Raoul_Luke]

Only a hack or a fool would continue to make allegations without evidence. There was no attempt to frame Trump.

The evidence is as plain as the nose on your face:

Obama, Clapper were briefed on reports of Clinton campaign's Russia collusion narrative, Durham report shows | Fox News

 

[RickWA]

Pelosi silent on Trump 'cold hard evidence' collusion claim after Durham report shows FBI, DOJ wrongdoing

Rep. Nancy Pelosi has remained silent since the release of the Durham report that showed the FBI and DOJ did not follow proper procedures launching the Trump-Russia probe.

www.foxnews.com

You’re going to need to be more specific. Our legislative and executive branches are LOADED with denture-slurping “Skeletors”.

We need to run them all off.

We won’t, but we need to do so.

 

[RickWA]

The evidence is as plain as the nose on your face:

Obama, Clapper were briefed on reports of Clinton campaign's Russia collusion narrative, Durham report shows | Fox News

No one cares. Or, more accurately, we selectively care as it impacts our preferred outcomes.

Welcome to the Third World. This continues whether Dems or GOPers are elected. It’s a citizen thing.

 

[middleview]

The evidence is as plain as the nose on your face:

Obama, Clapper were briefed on reports of Clinton campaign's Russia collusion narrative, Durham report shows | Fox News

Evidence of what? Russians hack the DNC and steal email. Wiki blasts DNC emai...Clinton campaign plans to link Trump.

Is there a crime you think was committed by someone?

 

[middleview]

And again, the idea that none of that information found its way via the Ohrs into the ears of the investigators is just silly.

All extremely and, well, obviously legal.

As long as none of the conspirators put their true intentions in writing or on tape, how could he "prove" the conspiracy existed. His findings suggest an obvious conspiracy, which you, being the hack you are, deny. Nothing to see here, move along...

His findings suggest? Are you f*cking kidding?

Jan 6 findings suggest Trump orchestrated a riot.

 

[JohnJohnson]

Durham's report changes nothing. His opinions were dictated to him by Trump. His assembled "facts" do not make his opinions any more credible. The very fact that he completely failed to prove any illegal acts by anyone in the FBI or the Clinton campaign seems to escape you.

Three indictments for people trying to frame Trump or his campaign, many lifetime FBI employees lost careers for misconduct related to the probe, FBI Director fired and excoriated by Obama's IG, and the FBI has vowed to take steps to stop corrupt investigations like this one in the future.


Otoh, no American was indicted....let alone accused.....of working with Russia to interfere in our elections. There was never any evidence whatsoever anyone was working with Russia.


In light of these irrefutable facts above which side has lied and is in the wrong here with regards to the Russian collusion hoax?

 

[middleview]

Three indictments for people trying to frame Trump or his campaign, many lifetime FBI employees lost careers for misconduct related to the probe, FBI Director fired and excoriated by Obama's IG, and the FBI has vowed to take steps to stop corrupt investigations like this one in the future.


Otoh, no American was indicted....let alone accused.....of working with Russia to interfere in our elections. There was never any evidence whatsoever anyone was working with Russia.


In light of these irrefutable facts above which side has lied and is in the wrong here with regards to the Russian collusion hoax?

Three indictments for what? His one conviction was for a lawyer who deleted a line from an email about Carter Page. The other two were dismissed.

As has been discussed...the Russians made a number of efforts to help Trump get elected...it made sense to investigate if anyone made any promises to have more favorable policies towards Russia if Trump won.

Many FBI employees lost jobs? Like McCabe? Sued and won a wrongful termination lawsuit.
Why did Trump fire Comey?

Who did the IG fire?

Your interpretation of the FBI steps to improve the FISA process in no way shows the Crossfire investigation was corrupt.

 

[Raoul_Luke]

Four year investigation and no convictions. That says it all.

About a corrupt, incompetent federal government? Yep!

 

[Raoul_Luke]

What do you have that refutes that article?

The obvious.