So let me get this straight...

[Raoul_Luke]

We are willing to start a nuclear WWIII over Putin's efforts to keep NATO out of the eastern region of Ukraine?

Soon after Russian President Vladimir Putin's speech announcing partial mobilization of national forces for the operation in Ukraine, which included a hint of willingness to resort to nuclear defense of Russia's territorial integrity, Navy Admiral Charles A. Richard - who currently serves as the US Strategic Command chief - confirmed that the Pentagon is taking the Russian nuclear threat seriously.

Putin had said in his early Wednesday address that "If Russia feels its territorial integrity is threatened, we will use all defense methods at our disposal, and this is not a bluff," while also decrying what he called the West's "nuclear blackmail".

Admiral Richard addressed a national security panel event later on the same day entitled "America Under Attack—Defending the Homeland" held in Maryland. He began by acknowledging that "All of us in this room are back in the business of contemplating competition through crisis and possible direct armed conflict with a nuclear-capable peer."

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

How does this constitute "America under attack?" How is that even remotely "defending the homeland?"

Have we all gone mad? This is insanity!

 

[Sickofleft]

We are willing to start a nuclear WWIII over Putin's efforts to keep NATO out of the eastern region of Ukraine?

Soon after Russian President Vladimir Putin's speech announcing partial mobilization of national forces for the operation in Ukraine, which included a hint of willingness to resort to nuclear defense of Russia's territorial integrity, Navy Admiral Charles A. Richard - who currently serves as the US Strategic Command chief - confirmed that the Pentagon is taking the Russian nuclear threat seriously.

Putin had said in his early Wednesday address that "If Russia feels its territorial integrity is threatened, we will use all defense methods at our disposal, and this is not a bluff," while also decrying what he called the West's "nuclear blackmail".

Admiral Richard addressed a national security panel event later on the same day entitled "America Under Attack—Defending the Homeland" held in Maryland. He began by acknowledging that "All of us in this room are back in the business of contemplating competition through crisis and possible direct armed conflict with a nuclear-capable peer."

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

How does this constitute "America under attack?" How is that even remotely "defending the homeland?"

Have we all gone mad? This is insanity!

It is insanity but for some reason our Gov't (useful idiots in both parties) have been begging for WWIII as they flood the second most corrupt country on earth with Billions of dollars. Money that they have absolutely no idea what the majority of it is being spent on......

It's insanity, but WWIII would be a great excuse for another lockdown on a large scale and we know how much the Democrats love that!

 

[middleview]

We are willing to start a nuclear WWIII over Putin's efforts to keep NATO out of the eastern region of Ukraine?

Soon after Russian President Vladimir Putin's speech announcing partial mobilization of national forces for the operation in Ukraine, which included a hint of willingness to resort to nuclear defense of Russia's territorial integrity, Navy Admiral Charles A. Richard - who currently serves as the US Strategic Command chief - confirmed that the Pentagon is taking the Russian nuclear threat seriously.

Putin had said in his early Wednesday address that "If Russia feels its territorial integrity is threatened, we will use all defense methods at our disposal, and this is not a bluff," while also decrying what he called the West's "nuclear blackmail".

Admiral Richard addressed a national security panel event later on the same day entitled "America Under Attack—Defending the Homeland" held in Maryland. He began by acknowledging that "All of us in this room are back in the business of contemplating competition through crisis and possible direct armed conflict with a nuclear-capable peer."

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

How does this constitute "America under attack?" How is that even remotely "defending the homeland?"

Have we all gone mad? This is insanity!

Putin is threatening nuclear war...not the USA. For some reason you think we should not be prepared for an attempt by the Russians to use their nukes in a first strike.

This isn't about Ukraine joining NATO. That was not about to happen. Putin repeatedly stated that Ukraine had no right to be an independent nation and made the claim that Ukraine was part of Russia.

 

[Raoul_Luke]

Putin is threatening nuclear war...not the USA. For some reason you think we should not be prepared for an attempt by the Russians to use their nukes in a first strike.

This isn't about Ukraine joining NATO. That was not about to happen. Putin repeatedly stated that Ukraine had no right to be an independent nation and made the claim that Ukraine was part of Russia.

Actually it was, as he had clearly stated. So, lets say you are correct. Again, why are we willing to start WWIII over Ukraine's "right to be an independent nation?"

 

[Raoul_Luke]

It is insanity but for some reason our Gov't (useful idiots in both parties) have been begging for WWIII as they flood the second most corrupt country on earth with Billions of dollars. Money that they have absolutely no idea what the majority of it is being spent on......

It's insanity, but WWIII would be a great excuse for another lockdown on a large scale and we know how much the Democrats love that!

I think you are on to something there. But I'm sure the fact that it is likely to pour a half trillion $ into the MIC/deep state unholy alliance is also in the mix. What isn't is how it affect the American people. I mean, look at the @middleview reply - he seems to think it is all good and necessary to start WWIII over "Ukraine's right to be an independent nation." How is that of any concern to us? If you read between his lines, it appears the war with Russia is in fact the guiding principle and Ukraine is simply the opportunity to enact it.

 

[middleview]

Actually it was, as he had clearly stated. So, lets say you are correct. Again, why are we willing to start WWIII over Ukraine's "right to be an independent nation?"

1. There was no move to include Ukraine in Nato.
2. Putin had talked about Ukraine being part of Russia for years.
3. Putin accused Ukraine of being run by Nazis. That was a lie and would not have changed if Ukraine had said no to any membership in Nato.
4. Putin also accused Ukraine of abusing Russian speaking citizens. That was also a lie and had nothing to do with Nato.

Your faith in Putin is comic.

 

[ObamacareForever]

We are willing to start a nuclear WWIII over Putin's efforts to keep NATO out of the eastern region of Ukraine?

Soon after Russian President Vladimir Putin's speech announcing partial mobilization of national forces for the operation in Ukraine, which included a hint of willingness to resort to nuclear defense of Russia's territorial integrity, Navy Admiral Charles A. Richard - who currently serves as the US Strategic Command chief - confirmed that the Pentagon is taking the Russian nuclear threat seriously.

Putin had said in his early Wednesday address that "If Russia feels its territorial integrity is threatened, we will use all defense methods at our disposal, and this is not a bluff," while also decrying what he called the West's "nuclear blackmail".

Admiral Richard addressed a national security panel event later on the same day entitled "America Under Attack—Defending the Homeland" held in Maryland. He began by acknowledging that "All of us in this room are back in the business of contemplating competition through crisis and possible direct armed conflict with a nuclear-capable peer."

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

How does this constitute "America under attack?" How is that even remotely "defending the homeland?"

Have we all gone mad? This is insanity!

No, again you have it backwards, Putin is the one willing to start a nuclear war. He is the aggressor.
If you give him an inch, he will take a mile.
Quit appeasing him.

 

[Jack4freedom]

1. There was no move to include Ukraine in Nato.
2. Putin had talked about Ukraine being part of Russia for years.
3. Putin accused Ukraine of being run by Nazis. That was a lie and would not have changed if Ukraine had said no to any membership in Nato.
4. Putin also accused Ukraine of abusing Russian speaking citizens. That was also a lie and had nothing to do with Nato.

Your faith in Putin is comic.

He and Trump are both a couple of Putin’s bitches….

 

[middleview]

Actually it was, as he had clearly stated. So, lets say you are correct. Again, why are we willing to start WWIII over Ukraine's "right to be an independent nation?"

If Putin launches nukes you would blame the US?

 

[Raoul_Luke]

If Putin launches nukes you would blame the US?

For launching the nuke? Why would I? We did however put the wheels in motion by interfering in Ukraine's internal political affairs.

 

[Raoul_Luke]

No, again you have it backwards, Putin is the one willing to start a nuclear war. He is the aggressor.
If you give him an inch, he will take a mile.
Quit appeasing him.

It takes two to tango.

 

[Raoul_Luke]

1. There was no move to include Ukraine in Nato.
2. Putin had talked about Ukraine being part of Russia for years.
3. Putin accused Ukraine of being run by Nazis. That was a lie and would not have changed if Ukraine had said no to any membership in Nato.
4. Putin also accused Ukraine of abusing Russian speaking citizens. That was also a lie and had nothing to do with Nato.

Your faith in Putin is comic.

1. Don't be ridiculous, it has been under discussion for years.
2. Was Ukraine ever part of Russia?
3. They do have nazis in uniform.
4. Were they? Why would that need to have something to do with NATO?

 

[Raoul_Luke]

He and Trump are both a couple of Putin’s bitches….

I'll put you and @middleview down as a couple of tin pot Dr. Strangeloves.

 

[middleview]

1. Don't be ridiculous, it has been under discussion for years.
2. Was Ukraine ever part of Russia?
3. They do have nazis in uniform.
4. Were they? Why would that need to have something to do with NATO?

1. Were they close to being admitted? No.
2. Did Ukrainians want to be part of Russia again? No. The union of the two was not a voluntary experience.
3. What has the Azov bunch done to call them Nazis? How many are there?
4. Got evidence?

 

[middleview]

It takes two to tango.

Launching nukes can be done by one side...just like the war.

 

[ObamacareForever]

It takes two to tango.

Who is going to start it?

 

[Jack4freedom]

I'll put you and @middleview down as a couple of tin pot Dr. Strangeloves.

Coming from you, if its meant to be an insult, I’ll take it as a compliment

 

[middleview]

I'll put you and @middleview down as a couple of tin pot Dr. Strangeloves.

It figures you'd continue to support Putin and attack anyone in favor of letting Putin know we'd strike back.

So we'll put you down as a wishy-washy, jello for a spine, candidate for the Quisling award or the Neville Chamberlain Diplomacy scholarship.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

We are willing to start a nuclear WWIII over Putin's efforts to keep NATO out of the eastern region of Ukraine?

Soon after Russian President Vladimir Putin's speech announcing partial mobilization of national forces for the operation in Ukraine, which included a hint of willingness to resort to nuclear defense of Russia's territorial integrity, Navy Admiral Charles A. Richard - who currently serves as the US Strategic Command chief - confirmed that the Pentagon is taking the Russian nuclear threat seriously.

Putin had said in his early Wednesday address that "If Russia feels its territorial integrity is threatened, we will use all defense methods at our disposal, and this is not a bluff," while also decrying what he called the West's "nuclear blackmail".

Admiral Richard addressed a national security panel event later on the same day entitled "America Under Attack—Defending the Homeland" held in Maryland. He began by acknowledging that "All of us in this room are back in the business of contemplating competition through crisis and possible direct armed conflict with a nuclear-capable peer."

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

How does this constitute "America under attack?" How is that even remotely "defending the homeland?"

Have we all gone mad? This is insanity!

Putin threatens nuclear war and Trump cultists bash….the United States!

Just like Trump himself.

Deplorable!

 

[middleview]

Coming from you, if its meant to be an insult, I’ll take it as a compliment

Shows what he knows about Dr Strangelove....like everything else, not much.

The story concerns an unhinged United States Air Force general who orders a first strike nuclear attack on the Soviet Union.