TheTrueRepublican
Council Member
What part of a random person making their own analysis of data an “MIT STUDY”?
So what's your guess...
- Thread starter Bernard_Fokke
- Start date
Mick
The Right is always right
You've still yet to show us anything that Democrats were suggesting or something Trump could have done that would have stopped a worldwide pandemic. Maybe Ho.mo, gruesome, and the senile Biden had the answers, huh? Ho.mo's gas chambers, Gruesome's economic destruction, and Biden's calling Trump's China travel ban a racist conspiracy were the answers? Or maybe they could ignore the whole thing to waste time on the most ridiculous, partisan, debunked impeachment in American history while the worldwide pandemic spread? Brilliant f...ckers!
Wait, they did all that! But somewhere in the putrid recesses of your mind you think they had an answer.......you just can't verbalize it. Sick one.
Bugsy McGurk
President
This one, along with his fellow Trump cultists, spent a year arguing against everything Dems proposed, such as masking, distancing, testing, tracing and restrictions, and now says Dems didn’t propose anything different.
Deplorable!
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
The same thing that makes this one:
Study predicts the oceans will start emitting ozone-depleting CFCs | MIT Climate Portal
Duh!
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
LOL! June 20, 2020? Isn't that back when anyone who suggested the virus might have escaped from the lab rather than the "wet market" was being derided as a "conspiricy theorist?" Why, yes, I believe it was!right/left bias EXTREME
View attachment 63571
View attachment 63570
SO you...of course, would think a propaganda site like WesternJournal would tell the truth. Here is what NIH says...
NIH halts clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine
Study shows treatment does no harm, but provides no benefit
NIH halts clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine
Study shows treatment does no harm, but provides no benefitwww.nih.gov
You should know by now that your insipid appeals to authority and use of left wing "fact checkers" to avoid having to address facts that conservative news outlets report on (and the left wing media won't touch because, well, they aren't really "news outlets" at all) don't impress me.
TheTrueRepublican
Council Member
“Generally, a colder ocean will absorb more CFCs,” Wang explains. “When climate change warms the ocean, it becomes a weaker reservoir and will also outgas a little faster.”
Cool, thanks for the study.
If it’s the same... where’s the published study on any MIT platform? You say “Duh” as if you proved something. But where’s the “MIT STUDY” you were originally talking about?
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
I never referred to it as an "MIT study." I simply likned to an article where the writer did so. Would it have been more accurate to say "MIT researcher's findings" rather than "MIT study?" Yeah, but that is symantics - it doesn't change the data this data analyst analyzed. If you have data that shows his research is full 0f sh*t, post it. Otherwise you are wasting both of our time here with this, what we around here refer to as a "dodge."
The conspiracy theory was that Covid was developed as part of a bio weapons project.
The Media Bias site actually, quite accurately, evaluates both right and left media. The problem you have is that you so consistently use far,far right groups as your source.
Not my problem. Feel free to use the bias checker on any of the sources I use.
I'd love to know what post of mine "appeals to authority". I bet you can't find one.
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
So are his facts wrong or not?
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Nope - that is total bullshit. Remember the "cancellation"of Tom Cotton? Find me a link where he said it was a "bioweapon." You do this all the time - when the left gets caught supporting an outright lie, they just pretend it was something else they were supporting. No harm, no foul...
you claimed you never called it an MIT study.
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Yeah, so it was just an MIT researcher doing a study. So sue me.
Now, are his facts wrong or not?
what you call facts, I call opinions.
he was not an MIT researcher...you are cracking me up!
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Let the record show that you did not refute his analysis of the facts.
Let the record show you lied about the study.
What the graph shows is subject to opinions of what it means.
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
The graph shows what it shows (no correlation between lockdowns and covid deaths). It is your "opinion" that it shows something else (correlation between population density and covid deaths). So take his covid death data points and plot it against population density instead of stringency of lockdown measures and we'll see if your opinion holds.
It ain't that simple and you probably know it.
For one thing...do people travel between those areas? Are the areas that suffered the most hospitalizations also the ones that have the most international travel? What is the age distribution?
My opinion is that the graphs prove nothing.
Care to comment on the fact that the research wasn't done by MIT and was not done by a researcher working for MIT? Sort of seems like you lied....
Raoul_Luke
I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
Those are all aspects that are measurable, so measure them - and we can examine your findings.
He's not the only one who has "studied" this premise:
Published Papers and Data on Lockdown Weak Efficacy - and Lockdown Huge Harms — The Fat Emperor
Harping on a mischaracterization of the guy's credentials may be personally satisfying for you (after all it is perhaps the first thing you have been right about for going on two years now), but it isn't a legitimate criticism of his findings. You can go ahead and correlate the covid results for other factors than lockdown stringency, but unless you can demonstrate that every single one of the more authoritarian covid regime states has very similar age, population density and travel characteristics to the others, then you can't honestly use that to reject the theory that the lockdowns had no effect.
