You know we whip these posts off, and we rarely go back and finish the thought or clarify a sentence.
So, to expand a bit on the point about being able to see the individual specks of space dust on the moon. What I was trying to say was this; we are looking at actual specks of space dust and being told it is a rover. You know this because they zoomed in on tracks and claimed they were footprints. Those tracks were made by rocks moving over the centuries, we already knew about that. And they never snapped an actual boot print and there should have been a gazillion of those.
But the central idea to this post is this; NASA sent up High spec cameras, but then pulled their usual lies and claimed they didn't send cameras that could focus in on the surface, to explain away all those pics of space dust and no Apollo equipment, only to turn around ten years later and knock off pics of tracks in the sand and try to pawn them off as footprints. But here they are caught in their own lies, because now they are admitting that they had the ability to focus in on the surface all along and now they are admitting that these are indeed zoomed-in pics of the lunar surface.
Occam's razor:
if it looks exactly like a zoomed in shot of the lunar surface and it came from a mapping mission that stated it was part of their mission to do that, and if the technology was easily there to do it...
just wait ten years and NASA will admit that it is indeed a zoomed in shot of the lunar surface.
Is there anyone left that is still dying stupid?
By now, it is a common joke, believing they really went to the moon.
sorry about the paradigm shift, it shook me up also. The commander of Skylab 4 was my collegiate best friend's dad, and actually my landlord for a while. I was a guest at his apartment more than once, you can imagine what all that was filled with. And I asked him, "what was the most amazing thing in space?" And he answered me, "the stars"... if the stars are the most amazing thing that he remembered from low orbit, how could the first mission to the moon return and not remember seeing a star at all? Sure they changed their story afterwards, but why would you need to change your story, if you didn't lie to begin with? How was it possible for them to go all the way to the moon and not come back utterly amazed by the stars? They were at lunar morning, had they actually stood on the moon, the sun was on the horizon, hence the long shadows in the fake pics. So, if they had really stood on the moon, the entire sky above them - jesus practically anywhere they looked - was vacuum filled stars. What I mean by that is this... there is no atmosphere to diffuse the sunlight like we have on earth, the moon has no sky, it is a straight view to the stars. Ever see a pic of the milky way taken at night in a place with no light? That's nothing compared to what the "astronauts" should have seen. It is our atmosphere that blocks our view of the stars. Forget about all those cropped pics and terrible early photo shopped pics or studio High glossy High quality pics not possible with the equipment the "astronauts" had... think about that first mission returning and the first men to step on the moon didn't see any stars. You know why they told that lie? They were told to tell it... to cover up for the cropped pics that had no stars in them....
View attachment 67376
.... as if you couldn't see the Milky Way galaxy from the moon, only from earth. Because you know, they only looked directly at the sun on the horizon the whole time they were there. Plus, there is all that glare from the earth's surface. And what exactly is "glare"? Well, that's, well, you know, that when light reflects off the surface. I see and what is the light reflecting into? Well, it's a phenomenon that happens with human sight and light. Yeah and how does it happen? Oh well, the light bounces off the surface and dissipates into the atmosphere and that creates glare. Yeah, I get it... but does that happen on the moon? Sure, just look at the moon pics. Right. (Light doesn't wrap around a shadow and back-light an object in a vacuum. There is no glare in a vacuum. You need an atmosphere to get those effects)
I just want you to know that if you cling to the moon hoax to your death, you didn't just die stupid, you died a total idiot. NASA lied their asses off about everything. How about bake - n - shake? They cooled the space capsule by half spinning it? really? How does that cool anything? (it doesn't) They went in and out of the lunar vehicle, into a total vacuum, without space locks, and still managed to fully pressurize the LEM so that they could sleep without their spacesuits on. There wasn't enough room in those capsules to bring enough breathing air, let alone do that. But people, my God, just ask yourself, how do you fully pressurize a lunar vehicle in a total vacuum when it has UN-reinforced aluminum foil for walls? 32 pounds per square inch is a lot of pressure in a vacuum. And why didn't it escape through the hatch? The lunar vehicle had no space locks, and you are still sitting there thinking that they lived in that on the moon for two weeks. Where did they go to bathroom? you can't take a crap in a total vacuum, your [Unwelcome language removed] will explode. So we are told that they wore a diaper and pissed and shit themselves for two full weeks. Sure they did. Obviously they would have changed when they took the space suits off at night, right? Wouldn't you? Would you put that diaper back on in the morning chock full of shit from ten days? No one does that, anyone would at least clean the diaper out of shit before wearing it again. But it was just another one of those things NASA didn't think of when they told their stories... so there it is, they had no change of diaper and they didn't even clean those diapers, that's the official story. Nobody stopped and realized what it meant when the astronauts had been there for 10, 11, 12, 13, and onto the 14th day. I will tell what it meant had it really happened; it meant shit was squeezing out of those diapers into the suit and by day 12 those suits were filled with more piss and shit then they were oxygen. But sorry, the astronauts never bothered to clean themselves or dispose of their waste on the moon; why would they have to? Look at the pics and videos, they were spotless, they didn't have any problem. Out of sight, out of mind. push the images and don't answer the questions. Eventually, everyone sees through your lies and you dispose of all the evidence, lose everything... oops where did we put all our footage from all the moon trips? dunno, does anyone care?
... not really... it was such ridiculous lies.