New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Some strange behavior

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
There are posters here who express strange behavior. They demand proof of things on unreasonable terms. Lets say that the last election was stolen. They'll insist that recounts are forensic audits and you're just unreasonable to not accept that people with a vested interested to support the status quo would find nothing wrong with their work product. Your concerns are debunked. You'll illustrate how apparently the cheating was so bad that partisan witnesses were removed from premises where some were to watch polls and other to challenge polls. That counting was shutdown for the night and yet without witnesses the counting continued. We all saw those statements made by the very people making the claim. But that is all "debunked" according to some here. That reasoning of yours angers them. They jump around like roosters in a c*ck fight insisting on proof of a stolen election but object at any kind of investigation that would make a finding either way unless and until you have "proof". Its pathetic reasoning. Dishonest and unpatriotic reasoning.

Then you humor them and offer "proof." You mention the video of women pulling hidden ballot boxes from under tables and counting them after they've sent what witnesses there were to the process home for the night. But don't believe your lying eyes, that is debunked too. Mention that Dominion hardware has internet access despite the CEO in congressional testimony saying they don't and despite law saying they shouldn't. BUTT FSCK THAT'S DEBUNKED TOO. ha ha ha ha

Then they get upset because you call them the names they deserve to be called. Well, fsck them.
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
There are posters here who express strange behavior. They demand proof of things on unreasonable terms. Lets say that the last election was stolen. They'll insist that recounts are forensic audits and you're just unreasonable to not accept that people with a vested interested to support the status quo would find nothing wrong with their work product. Your concerns are debunked. You'll illustrate how apparently the cheating was so bad that partisan witnesses were removed from premises where some were to watch polls and other to challenge polls. That counting was shutdown for the night and yet without witnesses the counting continued. We all saw those statements made by the very people making the claim. But that is all "debunked" according to some here. That reasoning of yours angers them. They jump around like roosters in a c*ck fight insisting on proof of a stolen election but object at any kind of investigation that would make a finding either way unless and until you have "proof". Its pathetic reasoning. Dishonest and unpatriotic reasoning.

Then you humor them and offer "proof." You mention the video of women pulling hidden ballot boxes from under tables and counting them after they've sent what witnesses there were to the process home for the night. But don't believe your lying eyes, that is debunked too. Mention that Dominion hardware has internet access despite the CEO in congressional testimony saying they don't and despite law saying they shouldn't. BUTT FSCK THAT'S DEBUNKED TOO. ha ha ha ha

Then they get upset because you call them the names they deserve to be called. Well, fsck them.
Perhaps it’s that your factual claims don’t stand up to scrutiny and the malfeasance you claim to have thought you saw was either your deliberate dishonesty or your simple-minded misunderstanding of the process. Perhaps we don’t want people who oppose the status quo (constitutional government by consent of the governed) to be the only voices heard, when your only reason to dismiss the many Republicans who have investigated and determined that Biden won a free and fair election is that you dislike their conclusions on ideological grounds.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
There are posters here who express strange behavior. They demand proof of things on unreasonable terms. Lets say that the last election was stolen. They'll insist that recounts are forensic audits and you're just unreasonable to not accept that people with a vested interested to support the status quo would find nothing wrong with their work product. Your concerns are debunked. You'll illustrate how apparently the cheating was so bad that partisan witnesses were removed from premises where some were to watch polls and other to challenge polls. That counting was shutdown for the night and yet without witnesses the counting continued. We all saw those statements made by the very people making the claim. But that is all "debunked" according to some here. That reasoning of yours angers them. They jump around like roosters in a c*ck fight insisting on proof of a stolen election but object at any kind of investigation that would make a finding either way unless and until you have "proof". Its pathetic reasoning. Dishonest and unpatriotic reasoning.

Then you humor them and offer "proof." You mention the video of women pulling hidden ballot boxes from under tables and counting them after they've sent what witnesses there were to the process home for the night. But don't believe your lying eyes, that is debunked too. Mention that Dominion hardware has internet access despite the CEO in congressional testimony saying they don't and despite law saying they shouldn't. BUTT FSCK THAT'S DEBUNKED TOO. ha ha ha ha

Then they get upset because you call them the names they deserve to be called. Well, fsck them.
These issues you mention have been thoroughly debunked. The video of someone pulling ballots from under a table also includes those ballot carriers being placed there. So what? They were put under that table because there had been a plumbing leak on the second floor earlier that day.

None of the dem or repub poll watchers was told to leave. They thought counting was done for the day and left. So? There were still observers there from the SoS office to audit the count.

Dominion hardware had no internet access.

Nobody said recounts are audits. I did say recounts and audits had been done everywhere you suggested a need for "forensic" audits...

What I object to is your insistence that the people doing those audits are not to be trusted when you even refuse to review the documents on those audits and haven't a clue as to who did them.

They were done by firms certified by the EAC and follow procedures set by the EAC. Unlike the cyber weenies who have no idea how to do an audit and find themselves looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots and then hiding their results.
 

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
These issues you mention have been thoroughly debunked. The video of someone pulling ballots from under a table also includes those ballot carriers being placed there. So what? They were put under that table because there had been a plumbing leak on the second floor earlier that day.

None of the dem or repub poll watchers was told to leave. They thought counting was done for the day and left. So? There were still observers there from the SoS office to audit the count.

Dominion hardware had no internet access.

Nobody said recounts are audits. I did say recounts and audits had been done everywhere you suggested a need for "forensic" audits...

What I object to is your insistence that the people doing those audits are not to be trusted when you even refuse to review the documents on those audits and haven't a clue as to who did them.

They were done by firms certified by the EAC and follow procedures set by the EAC. Unlike the cyber weenies who have no idea how to do an audit and find themselves looking for bamboo fibers in the ballots and then hiding their results.
The plumbing leak was a lie. I stopped reading on your first lie.
 

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
Perhaps it’s that your factual claims don’t stand up to scrutiny and the malfeasance you claim to have thought you saw was either your deliberate dishonesty or your simple-minded misunderstanding of the process. Perhaps we don’t want people who oppose the status quo (constitutional government by consent of the governed) to be the only voices heard, when your only reason to dismiss the many Republicans who have investigated and determined that Biden won a free and fair election is that you dislike their conclusions on ideological grounds.
Your commie ass doesn't give a shit about our constitutional government. Sit down. The rest of your post is the same bullshit that can't explain the hidden under the table ballots counted after hours and the internet connection of election equipment.
 
Last edited:

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
Perhaps it’s that your factual claims don’t stand up to scrutiny and the malfeasance you claim to have thought you saw was either your deliberate dishonesty or your simple-minded misunderstanding of the process. Perhaps we don’t want people who oppose the status quo (constitutional government by consent of the governed) to be the only voices heard, when your only reason to dismiss the many Republicans who have investigated and determined that Biden won a free and fair election is that you dislike their conclusions on ideological grounds.
Brilliant!!! Factual claims are a good reason to deny validity and I am sure you have false claims to prove your point is valid. Brilliant.

Bwahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahah!
 

EatTheRich

President
Your commie ass doesn't give a shit about our constitutional government. Sit down. The rest of your post is the same bullshit that can't explain the hidden under the table ballots counted after hours and the internet connection of election equipment.
The internet connection didn’t exist. The ballots were pulled out from under the table because they had been stored there when they were received and came with a thoroughly investigated chain of custody that was entirely legitimate.
 

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
The internet connection didn’t exist. The ballots were pulled out from under the table because they had been stored there when they were received and came with a thoroughly investigated chain of custody that was entirely legitimate.
Lies. I saw the video and the time stamps. This warranted an immediate bi-partisan investigation while the going on a year long delay has allowed for the white washing of the Crime scene.
 

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
looks more like dude knocked your post into next tuesday, and now youre pissed...
No, you have people whose capacity is simply negation. They make things up and only accept their sources' veracity. They've literally asked me what I'd have done. I say what it would be and they then ignore it or say that it was done. It wasn't. When ignored your leg humpers simply try to gain attention by humping harder because they think they're winning Trump style. They aren't.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
No, you have people whose capacity is simply negation. They make things up and only accept their sources' veracity. They've literally asked me what I'd have done. I say what it would be and they then ignore it or say that it was done. It wasn't. When ignored your leg humpers simply try to gain attention by humping harder because they think they're winning Trump style. They aren't.
yes, we've discussed that quirk of yours repeatedly.
 

EatTheRich

President
Yes, it was.
Thoroughly investigated by the Republican Secretary of State’s office which found otherwise
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Lies. I saw the video and the time stamps. This warranted an immediate bi-partisan investigation while the going on a year long delay has allowed for the white washing of the Crime scene.
what time were those ballots put under the table?
 

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
Thoroughly investigated by the Republican Secretary of State’s office which found otherwise
Smells like a cover up to me. And now that so much time has elapsed they're likely to get away with it.
 

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
Lies. I saw the video and the time stamps. This warranted an immediate bi-partisan investigation while the going on a year long delay has allowed for the white washing of the Crime scene.
Nope. Who Cares that you saw the video and the timestamps. What does that even mean?

I know. It means absolutely zero other than you saw a video, and you saw some timestamps. Big deal. You seeing a video, and some time stamps in the video, doesn't somehow validate that a fraud was perpetrated.

Meanwhile, back on Earth, election officials and other investigators validated and that nothing nefarious occurred.
 
Top