Dawg isn't a debater.Would anyone pay to see a Bugsy vs Dawg debate live on PoliticalJack.com?
I have the equipment to stream it live, just would have to get them in the same room together. Could be fun.
Dawg isn't a debater.Would anyone pay to see a Bugsy vs Dawg debate live on PoliticalJack.com?
I have the equipment to stream it live, just would have to get them in the same room together. Could be fun.
Trump isn't a debater yet has won every debate he has attended.Dawg isn't a debater.
why were you derailing the thread (in post #18)? that's against the rules.Trump isn't a debater yet has won every debate he has attended.
How do you derail a thread that has a top post with no content? This isn't even an allowed thread top post.why were you derailing the thread (in post #18)? that's against the rules.
you said: This isn't even an allowed thread top post.How do you derail a thread that has a top post with no content? This isn't even an allowed thread top post.
Use the report button.
I'd pay to be spared Bugsy's rambling.Would anyone pay to see a Bugsy vs Dawg debate live on PoliticalJack.com?
I have the equipment to stream it live, just would have to get them in the same room together. Could be fun.
This was the top post: "in Iowa. Guess he's not the 'winner' he claimed. LOL"you said: This isn't even an allowed thread top post.
I say: you're losing it.
That could be arranged...I'd pay to be spared Bugsy's rambling.
neither is hillary...........Cheater
That could be arranged...
I'm not from Ohio either, but, will be there in a couple weeks............I'm a debeater.Dawg isn't a debater.
What rules?This was the top post: "in Iowa. Guess he's not the 'winner' he claimed. LOL"
It has no content, link, or commentary which of course is against the PJ rules.
Agree/Disagree and why?
Translation: I know Iowa doesn't mean squat, but can never resist delicious Trump chum.Dunno.
Anyway, who's your favorite candidate?
I didn't delete because there was already two pages of discussion before I read it.What rules?
If it's against the rules, why haven't you deleted it?
Then you can delete your posts starting with #18 where you're clearly trying to derail the thread.
Wait, I thought he lost to Gore...I looked it up for you guys. It turns out the last Republican Iowa Caucus winner to become president was George W. Bush.
It is my opinion that it is funny (hence the lol) that the candidate who calls others loser as though that is substantive commentary, and calls himself winner as though is a detailed policy position, lost. Thus my top post.I didn't delete because there was already two pages of discussion before I read it.
Rules:
https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/warning-to-posters-with-no-real-content-read.75363/
Also listed in the forum rules here:
10. THREAD CREATION
The opening post of a thread sets the topic and the tone of the discussion. It should contain a member's opinions or questions with sufficient elaboration to establish a foundation for respectful discussion and debate. Threads should not be posted in the wrong forum, or be duplicates of other threads and/or topics (creating multiple threads with fundamentally the same topic is not allowed). Images, links, quotations, etc., should be used to support a member's opinion, not to replace it. Thread titles should be a description of the thread topic (and if not they may be altered by the moderators). Whether a thread has sufficiently set a basis for respectful debate on the thread topic will be at the discretion of the moderators.
The crazy thing is the real race starts after new hampshire where it looks like both Clinton and Trump have big leads the rest of the way... Could be a presidents wife vs a billionaire with an offending personality.It is my opinion that it is funny (hence the lol) that the candidate who calls others loser as though that is substantive commentary, and calls himself winner as though is a detailed policy position, lost. Thus my top post.
at least a coin wasn't needed to determine WINNERIt is my opinion that it is funny (hence the lol) that the candidate who calls others loser as though that is substantive commentary, and calls himself winner as though is a detailed policy position, lost. Thus my top post.