Alinvegas
FJB
Mine is Newt, Paul, Perry.
Go ahead. You may be surprised.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/candidate-match-game
Go ahead. You may be surprised.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/candidate-match-game
Take this test to see who your Rep candidate should be
- Thread starter Alinvegas
- Start date
GordonGecko
President
I like your choices, Al.....too bad you'll get none of them. The RNC isn't suicidal.
Angel of Dearth
Council Member
Apparently I vote for me.
Not bad. But I can't stand the lack of creative choices. And no question on what to do with the Fed? Hmph. Ah well.
Apparently, I scored 0% with Obama. I know you're as shocked as I am.
Not bad. But I can't stand the lack of creative choices. And no question on what to do with the Fed? Hmph. Ah well.
Apparently, I scored 0% with Obama. I know you're as shocked as I am.
GordonGecko
President
Hey look at it this way AoD.....Michele Bachmann only got six percentage points more than YOU in Iowa last night.
Mine came out Bachmann, Gingrich, Huntsman.
I have never been a huge Bachmann supporter most likely due to reasons not questioned here.
I like Huntsman but do not see him as electable.
And yes, I realize that Gingrich is only marginally electable because of his baggage. People are malleable and can be easily swayed against a candidate with the right ads.
I have never been a huge Bachmann supporter most likely due to reasons not questioned here.
I like Huntsman but do not see him as electable.
And yes, I realize that Gingrich is only marginally electable because of his baggage. People are malleable and can be easily swayed against a candidate with the right ads.
Obama was zero for me too................oddly enough so was Romney. lolol...........Looks like I may not get a very good choice there come November.
You two picked Obama and scored zero on a test to see who your Rep candidate should be.
I take it neither of you do well on tests.
GordonGecko
President
Angel of Dearth
Council Member
Having said that mine came out Paul, Perry, Bachmann.
Which is wierd because there's no way I'll vote for Paul or Perry. Bachmann? Sure. Santorum? Sure, but he scored very low on my test. Again, lack of creative answers means I chose "none of the above" on a number of questions.
Which is wierd because there's no way I'll vote for Paul or Perry. Bachmann? Sure. Santorum? Sure, but he scored very low on my test. Again, lack of creative answers means I chose "none of the above" on a number of questions.
:decision:I want to change to a different corruption. Can't let one kind go on too long.
Obama, Gingrich and Ron Paul, oh my.
There were definitely some very poor answers there. I chose the one that most closely fit my thoughts .... sometimes it was a stretch.
GordonGecko
President
I've explained all of my positions here, including the one you mentioned. It is you who obviously haven't read what I've written.
GordonGecko
President
Perhaps I missed it. To recap, you said Romney might be a liberal...but you didn't care because he was a "leader" and you bemoaned the fact that the President "didn't get anything done" (odd, given he's accused of "enacting a vast socialist agenda"...but no matter).
So it seems strange you, a person right-of-Center, would want to swap a liberal who will "get things done" (i.e. their liberal agenda)....for a person you consider a liberal who does NOT "get things done"....which would be LESS liberalism.
So why would you want MORE liberalism, Jen?!?!?
