Menu
New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Thanks Fareed Zakaria

middleview

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Raoul_Luke said:
Backups of the server hard drives isn't access to the, you know, firewall and/or switch logs.

I prefer the fact that no one apparently found any external traffic associated with the email file "exfiltration." Obviously it was taken but any "conclusions" about by whom or how is conjecture. Now that we know that Hillary had in place, at the time, a plan to tie Trump to Russian efforts to steal the election, it begs the question whether the whole emails to Wikileaks deal was part of that hoax. Presumably that implication would offset any negatives associated with what was in the emails - after all, it's not like it was evidence of a crime. Anyone who believed the DNC was interested in a Bernie Sanders candidacy has sh*t for brains. By "every credible source" you mean Crowdstrike and the Government. Crowdstrike has admitted they have no idea if the Russians took those emails, so that leaves the Government, and I'm sorry but that "appeal to authority" is, well, laughable. The Government has been lying to us throughout its existence.
Click to expand...
The "government" being the Senate Intelligence committee and Mueller.

You prefer Putin and Assange.
 
middleview

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Sickofleft said:
Wow.. lot of technical bullshit still ending in.... you are lying as per usual.

So much technical evidence YET still under oath nobody would confirm it was the Russians...... do ya know why?....... wait for it......

The Russians did not hack the DNC.
Click to expand...
Thanks for your opinion. You, Putin and Assange say it wasn't them. Here you have more detail on how they did it....Now that you've been proven wrong I expect you'll continue to pretend you still have reason to think it was an insider...because that is what Trump wants you to do.

Read page 179 on....

 
Raoul_Luke

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
write on said:
Yeah, right. If I remember history correctly, there was another tyrant that said he would not advance any further after taking control of parts of Czechoslovakia in 1938.

He then attacked Poland.
Click to expand...
I guess we have suspended Godwin's Law at this juncture...
 
middleview

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Raoul_Luke said:
Where is their evidence? Without that this "finding" has all the validity of the Saddam Hussein's WMD claims.
Click to expand...
I posted a link to the document that contains a ton of information on how it was done. Feel free to ignore it. It isn't like you have any credibility to lose.
 
middleview

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Raoul_Luke said:
No serious observer considers this anything less than a proxy war between NATO and Russia. Only a hack propagandist would suggest otherwise.
Click to expand...
Only a hack with his head up Putin's ass would suggest that the war was not Putin's fault and that NATO had anything to do with the invasion. NATO responded with weapons.
If they'd have followed your advice Putin would have annexed Ukraine long ago.
 
Raoul_Luke

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
middleview said:
Putin invaded because Ukraine did not have a military alliance. If they'd been a member of NATO he wouldn't have dared.
Click to expand...
If there were no NATO he woudn't have as well. And 300,000 Ukrainians would still be alive...
 
Raoul_Luke

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
middleview said:
Only a hack with his head up Putin's ass would suggest that the war was not Putin's fault and that NATO had anything to do with the invasion. NATO responded with weapons.
If they'd have followed your advice Putin would have annexed Ukraine long ago.
Click to expand...
The hell he would have - there was no reason to (absent pending NATO membership). Yes, he would still have occupied the Russian speaking areas that were being attacked by the Ukrainian Nazis in the Azov Battalion, but he had no need to annex the more western areas of Ukraine.
 
Zam-Zam

Zam-Zam

Senator
write on said:
What's the hurry now since Russia has already begun the invasion? Ukraine will still have the protection of NATO.
Click to expand...
Seems odd. We're willing to spend endlessly to defend them yet won't allow them membership into an alliance that could have prevented the invasion in the first place.

It's almost as if we wanted this war.
 
W

write on

Senator
Raoul_Luke said:
The hell he would have - there was no reason to (absent pending NATO membership). Yes, he would still have occupied the Russian speaking areas that were being attacked by the Ukrainian Nazis in the Azov Battalion, but he had no need to annex the more western areas of Ukraine.
Click to expand...
How do you know that? Do you have a direct line to Putin?
 
Raoul_Luke

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
middleview said:
I posted a link to the document that contains a ton of information on how it was done. Feel free to ignore it. It isn't like you have any credibility to lose.
Click to expand...
You are, of course (as is par for your course) conflating the hack with the email release to wikileaks. I have never disputed the there were Russian hackers on the DNC network. But before you accuse another soverign nation of interfering in your election, you damn well better have ironclad proof. Your link doesn't contain that...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top