JohnJohnson
Council Member
Yes, you've dodged incessantly. I'll ask you an 11th time. Do you accept the judge's finding that Democrats lied about "Jim Crow on steroids"?I smell a winger dodge coming.
;-)
Yes, you've dodged incessantly. I'll ask you an 11th time. Do you accept the judge's finding that Democrats lied about "Jim Crow on steroids"?I smell a winger dodge coming.
;-)
and I'm not here 24/7/365 and posting in Every thread as you areShe did not file any lawsuits seeking to overturn the election.
You post more than any other person here...you should hit 200k posts any day. I think you get a toaster.
They didn't examine the evidence. No judge ever did. You are wrong.You have expressed your opinion that the judges in 61 cases did not look at the "evidence". The facts show you are wrong.
Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, who oversaw the case, began the scathing ruling stating: "Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
Trump-Appointed Judge Dismisses Pennsylvania Election Case in Trump's Latest Legal Defeat (newsweek.com)
Federal judge sanctions Trump attorneys for spreading false election fraud claims
It is the latest instance of the former president’s allies being penalized for their roles in spreading conspiracies about the 2020 vote.
Powell, Wood and others joined a lawsuit in November alleging widespread fraud in the presidential contest in Michigan, which President Joe Biden won. Parker dismissed the lawsuit a month later because she found that it was based largely on "speculation and conjecture,"
Federal judge sanctions Trump attorneys for spreading false election fraud claims (nbcnews.com)
Judges across the political spectrum rejected Trump?s efforts to overturn the election - The Washington Post
"Seems" like it TO YOU. > When that's what you're looking for.And the 2 or 3 thousand who attacked police, broke down windows and doors? Seems they heard "Fight like hell"
Did they riot or were they peaceful?"Seems" like it TO YOU. > When that's what you're looking for.
And yet I proved they did.They didn't examine the evidence. No judge ever did. You are wrong.
No you didn't.And yet I proved they did.
Not interested in bothering with OLD NEWS.Did they riot or were they peaceful?
Clever way to avoid an answer. Next hearing coming up. If Trump is indicted will you be interested then?Not interested in bothering with OLD NEWS.
The judges rulings clearly showed they reviewed the "evidence"..No you didn't.
OLD TOPIC - Now get up to date >>
Richard Allen Davis - Still Alive, Because of Gavin Newsome | PoliticalJack.com
So you also aren't interested in Hunter Biden's laptop, right? Or Durham's investigation?Not interested in bothering with OLD NEWS.
Until 2018.What info was used to support the request for a FISA warrant on Page that was not verified? Did he meet with the Russian Deputy Prime minister or not?
The documents in the warehouse at Hoffman estates were under the control of NARA employees.
The facts behind Trump’s garbage claim that Obama ‘kept’ 33 million documents
The unclassified documents from the Obama administration are at the official Obama Presidential Library in Hoffman Estates; classified material is in Maryland.
Trump falsely claimed Obama kept 33 million documents; here’s the facts - Chicago Sun-Times (suntimes.com)
As the article shows the unclassified stuff was kept in a warehouse under control of the National Archives employees, classified stuff was kept at a federal facility in Maryland.Until 2018.
Obama kept his classified documents at Hoffman Estates until then, got a lovely letter from the National Archives instructing them on how to move the documents back.
Membership has its benefits.
The only thing I'm avoiding, is you beating an old dead subject to death, dwelling on worn-out threads, when I have started numerous new threads, since my first post in this one.Clever way to avoid an answer. Next hearing coming up. If Trump is indicted will you be interested then?
What I'm interested in, is the threads I started, listed in Post # 214, - aren't you interested in THEM ?So you also aren't interested in Hunter Biden's laptop, right? Or Durham's investigation?
noWhat I'm interested in, is the threads I started, listed in Post # 214, - aren't you interested in THEM ?
Yet you posted about arresting Hillary for emails from 2010...What I'm interested in, is the threads I started, listed in Post # 214, - aren't you interested in THEM ?
Oh that must be it then ... no further questions...As the article shows the unclassified stuff was kept in a warehouse under control of the National Archives employees, classified stuff was kept at a federal facility in Maryland.
to support the move of classified and unclassified Obama Presidential records and artifacts from Hoffman Estates to NARA-controlled facilities that conform to the agency’s archival storage standards for such records and artifacts.”
So ?Yet you posted about arresting Hillary for emails from 2010...
Because you're afraid of them.