New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

The big lie

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Yup. Carter Page was one of the five unknown idiots that Trump identified as his foreign policy advisory team:


“Another private-sector Trump adviser is Carter Page, a former investment banker and global energy consultant who graduated from the Naval Academy, according to his online biography. In discursive online blog postings about foreign policy that invoke the likes of Kanye West, Oprah Winfrey and Rhonda Byrne’s self-help bestseller “The Secret,” Page has blamed the U.S. for “misguided and provocative actions” toward Russia — notable in light of Trump’s friendly words for Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Page, who has worked for Merrill Lynch in Moscow, has accused the State Department’s top official for Ukraine and Russia, Victoria Nuland, of “fomenting” the 2014 revolution that overthrew Ukraine’s government. That charge is often lodged by pro-Kremlin media outlets but is strongly disputed by the Obama administration.

Page has also compared the Obama administration’s official 2015 national security strategy document to an 1850 document on how to manage slaves.”

And was fired from the campaign in September 2020, according to the campaign. Why wouldn't his contacts with people high up in the Kremlin have been investigated.

Funny, but it seems any and all investigations involving the suggestion that a republican may have committed a crime is loudly damned as partisan...but the investigations of White Water or Benghazi were not.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
And was fired from the campaign in September 2020, according to the campaign. Why wouldn't his contacts with people high up in the Kremlin have been investigated.

Funny, but it seems any and all investigations involving the suggestion that a republican may have committed a crime is loudly damned as partisan...but the investigations of White Water or Benghazi were not.
In Trumplandia, the endless investigations into Whitewater and Benghazi were righteous, but it was wrong to investigate a presidential candidate’s foreign policy adviser who had said he was an adviser to the Kremlin.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
In Trumplandia, the endless investigations into Whitewater and Benghazi were righteous, but it was wrong to investigate a presidential candidate’s foreign policy adviser who had said he was an adviser to the Kremlin.
They were pissed about watergate, Iran/Contra...Mueller and both impeachments. They should try for a less criminal leader.
 

JohnJohnson

Council Member
Asked and answered.
Yet, you still don't understand.

"Plaintiffs have not provided direct evidence of a voter who was unable to vote, experienced longer wait times, was confused about voter registration status.....

"The Court finds that plaintiffs have failed to prove that the burdens imposed by [exact match] outweigh the State's interests in preventing fraud."



I'll ask again. Which side is using facts again? The side trying to prevent fraud or the side trying to push the hoax of voter suppression?
 

JohnJohnson

Council Member
You obviously can’t confront the portion of the opinion I pasted in five times.
So the length of this case has what to do with the fact the corrupt Democrats lied and had no evidence of anyone being discriminated against?

Plaintiffs have not provided direct evidence of a voter who was unable to vote, experienced longer wait times, was confused about voter registration status."


I've asked you several times. Do you agree with this judge or not???? You still cannot answer. What a loon! Frightened to answer the question already answers for it.

 

JohnJohnson

Council Member
And was fired from the campaign in September 2020, according to the campaign. Why wouldn't his contacts with people high up in the Kremlin have been investigated.
Why would they used the corrupt Democrat-paid for Steele dossier as virtually the entirety of the evidence to excuse their spying? Why did the IG rule the FISA warrants illegal?

Facts don't matter to the insane.
 

EatTheRich

President
Yet, you still don't understand.

"Plaintiffs have not provided direct evidence of a voter who was unable to vote, experienced longer wait times, was confused about voter registration status.....

"The Court finds that plaintiffs have failed to prove that the burdens imposed by [exact match] outweigh the State's interests in preventing fraud."



I'll ask again. Which side is using facts again? The side trying to prevent fraud or the side trying to push the hoax of voter suppression?
The left is trying to prevent your fraud, the intent of which is to disfranchise voters even if no voter feels safe coming out publicly as a victim.
 

JohnJohnson

Council Member

JohnJohnson

Council Member
The left is trying to prevent your fraud, the intent of which is to disfranchise voters even if no voter feels safe coming out publicly as a victim.
The judge says that is not true:

"The Court finds that plaintiffs have failed to prove that the burdens imposed by [exact match] outweigh the State's interests in preventing fraud."


Republicans are preventing fraud. Democrats are trying to make it more likely. Who is access to the truth and telling it like it is? Some nut that is unable to think for himself on a message board and who just repeats what Democrats tell him or the facts as proven in court and announced by the judge?
 
And was fired from the campaign in September 2020, according to the campaign. Why wouldn't his contacts with people high up in the Kremlin have been investigated.

Funny, but it seems any and all investigations involving the suggestion that a republican may have committed a crime is loudly damned as partisan...but the investigations of White Water or Benghazi were not.
It's sad that you are still trying to white wash this, they lied to get FISA warrants on Page so they could spy on the rival parties campaign.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
It's sad that you are still trying to white wash this, they lied to get FISA warrants on Page so they could spy on the rival parties campaign.
It is sad you keep pushing that bullshit. The IG report did not say they lied. You still say they did. The IG report did not say they spied on the campaign. But you do.

Just can't fix stubborn.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Why would they used the corrupt Democrat-paid for Steele dossier as virtually the entirety of the evidence to excuse their spying? Why did the IG rule the FISA warrants illegal?

Facts don't matter to the insane.
The IG report did not claim they were illegal...if he had wouldn't Durham indicted people?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
The lack of providing no evidence of voters not being disenfranchised is not "opinion" any more than saying water is not wet is not "opinion". It's a lie

We can go around and around all you want. It's still a lie.
You think the failure of those lawyers to present sufficient evidence means there isn't any.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Yet, you still don't understand.

"Plaintiffs have not provided direct evidence of a voter who was unable to vote, experienced longer wait times, was confused about voter registration status.....

"The Court finds that plaintiffs have failed to prove that the burdens imposed by [exact match] outweigh the State's interests in preventing fraud."



I'll ask again. Which side is using facts again? The side trying to prevent fraud or the side trying to push the hoax of voter suppression?
And I bet you feel the same way about the 61 lawsuits Trump and company brought to overturn 2020...right?
 
Once again the evidence that Trumps campaign was spied on is an established fact. The poster below as usual ignores that and continues lying about, once again ignoring the evidence he begged for..... until he saw it..

Some people cannot deal with the fact that they have been lied to repeatedly since 2016 (probably since 2008, Obama was a f-cking terrible President) and chose...... to just keep lying.


It is sad you keep pushing that bullshit. The IG report did not say they lied. You still say they did. The IG report did not say they spied on the campaign. But you do.

Just can't fix stubborn.
Yes, I am sure you are told often that you can't fix a "stubborn ass-ole" like one who still lies and insists that Trumps campaign was not spied on.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Once again the evidence that Trumps campaign was spied on is an established fact. The poster below as usual ignores that and continues lying about, once again ignoring the evidence he begged for..... until he saw it..

Some people cannot deal with the fact that they have been lied to repeatedly since 2016 (probably since 2008, Obama was a f-cking terrible President) and chose...... to just keep lying.




Yes, I am sure you are told often that you can't fix a "stubborn ass-ole" like one who still lies and insists that Trumps campaign was not spied on.
Because a few emails from Page to someone in the campaign doesn't add up to spying on the campaign.
 

Bugsy McGurk

President
So the length of this case has what to do with the fact the corrupt Democrats lied and had no evidence of anyone being discriminated against?

Plaintiffs have not provided direct evidence of a voter who was unable to vote, experienced longer wait times, was confused about voter registration status."


I've asked you several times. Do you agree with this judge or not???? You still cannot answer. What a loon! Frightened to answer the question already answers for it.

It has nothing to do with the length of the case. The point is that the Abrams-related challengers won some of their challenges. While you just ignore that and pretend it isn’t so. You’re tedious.
 

EatTheRich

President
The judge says that is not true:

"The Court finds that plaintiffs have failed to prove that the burdens imposed by [exact match] outweigh the State's interests in preventing fraud."


Republicans are preventing fraud. Democrats are trying to make it more likely. Who is access to the truth and telling it like it is? Some nut that is unable to think for himself on a message board and who just repeats what Democrats tell him or the facts as proven in court and announced by the judge?
No, they claim to be preventing (nonexistent, as the facts show) fraud in order to reintroduce Jim Crow elections. The judge was limited to talking about what had been proven in court, not what was actually true.
 
Top