New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

The Committee in action

Boca

Governor
That certainly is what “the defense” of Trump and his associates looks like.
There is no defense of Trump. The committee is made up of seven Democrats and the two Republicans who voted to establish the committee, Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger, both Trump haters. It's a committee all of whose members were chosen by one party, and where there is no cross-examination or any attempt to present both sides,"

The committee is a despicable 3rd world debased travesty,

As a Democrat you must be very proud.
 

EatTheRich

President
There is no defense of Trump. The committee is made up of seven Democrats and the two Republicans who voted to establish the committee, Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger, both Trump haters. It's a committee all of whose members were chosen by one party, and where there is no cross-examination or any attempt to present both sides,"

The committee is a despicable 3rd world debased travesty,

As a Democrat you must be very proud.
McCarthy had the chance to put Republicans on the committee (as long as they weren’t personally implicated in the coup attempt) and chose not to. The Democratic leadership can’t force the Republicans to participate if they refuse to. Any constitutionalist member of Congress will by that token be a Trump hater.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
There is no defense of Trump. The committee is made up of seven Democrats and the two Republicans who voted to establish the committee, Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger, both Trump haters. It's a committee all of whose members were chosen by one party, and where there is no cross-examination or any attempt to present both sides,"

The committee is a despicable 3rd world debased travesty,

As a Democrat you must be very proud.
And practically every witness has been a Trump supporter up until the Jan 6 riot.
 

God of War

Governor
So you'd suggest everyone subpoenaed by Durham ignore it?
You really can't tell the difference between a kangaroo court disguised as a politicized hearing and legitimate investigations? How about executive privilege? Does that seem necessary to you?
 

God of War

Governor
So Hillary was a fool to indulge the republican hearings into Benghazi?
How stacked was the commitee? Oh, wait there were political friends of hers on the committee. Go figure. Besides they already did a failed impeachment on the matter. How many stabs at the apple do they get?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You really can't tell the difference between a kangaroo court disguised as a politicized hearing and legitimate investigations? How about executive privilege? Does that seem necessary to you?
So Durham, three years in, has produced one guilty plea for removing a sentence from an email....and lost a case of a lawyer lying to the FBI....and you think his is legit...

But an investigation into a riot that threatened to stop the count of electors to give the president a chance to overturn the election is not.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
You had the impeachment. One was enough.
Not by a long shot. Trump stayed in office because of the partisanship of the republicans in the senate. Not because there wasn't a reason to convict. Add to that the actual conviction in the senate only carried the threat of removal from office. It would not have been a criminal trial.

Now there is the chance of a criminal conviction for multiple crimes.
 
Top