Calling them all clowns would be the polite way of putting it and completely accurate.
There is no defense of Trump. The committee is made up of seven Democrats and the two Republicans who voted to establish the committee, Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger, both Trump haters. It's a committee all of whose members were chosen by one party, and where there is no cross-examination or any attempt to present both sides,"That certainly is what “the defense” of Trump and his associates looks like.
McCarthy had the chance to put Republicans on the committee (as long as they weren’t personally implicated in the coup attempt) and chose not to. The Democratic leadership can’t force the Republicans to participate if they refuse to. Any constitutionalist member of Congress will by that token be a Trump hater.There is no defense of Trump. The committee is made up of seven Democrats and the two Republicans who voted to establish the committee, Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger, both Trump haters. It's a committee all of whose members were chosen by one party, and where there is no cross-examination or any attempt to present both sides,"
The committee is a despicable 3rd world debased travesty,
As a Democrat you must be very proud.
Just like a kangaroo court would do.
Does it? Because I heard Trump doesn't have any representation at this leftist kangaroo court.That certainly is what “the defense” of Trump and his associates looks like.
He is welcome to testify with his lawyer present.Does it? Because I heard Trump doesn't have any representation at this leftist kangaroo court.
Only a fool would indulge a kangaroo court and he already did twice before under fairer circumstances.He is welcome to testify with his lawyer present.
And practically every witness has been a Trump supporter up until the Jan 6 riot.There is no defense of Trump. The committee is made up of seven Democrats and the two Republicans who voted to establish the committee, Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger, both Trump haters. It's a committee all of whose members were chosen by one party, and where there is no cross-examination or any attempt to present both sides,"
The committee is a despicable 3rd world debased travesty,
As a Democrat you must be very proud.
So Hillary was a fool to indulge the republican hearings into Benghazi?Only a fool would indulge a kangaroo court and he already did twice before under fairer circumstances.
Why did McConnell pull three republicans from the panel?Does it? Because I heard Trump doesn't have any representation at this leftist kangaroo court.
So you'd suggest everyone subpoenaed by Durham ignore it?Only a fool would indulge a kangaroo court and he already did twice before under fairer circumstances.
You really can't tell the difference between a kangaroo court disguised as a politicized hearing and legitimate investigations? How about executive privilege? Does that seem necessary to you?So you'd suggest everyone subpoenaed by Durham ignore it?
How stacked was the commitee? Oh, wait there were political friends of hers on the committee. Go figure. Besides they already did a failed impeachment on the matter. How many stabs at the apple do they get?So Hillary was a fool to indulge the republican hearings into Benghazi?
Isn't McConnell a senator?Why did McConnell pull three republicans from the panel?
Yup...my bad. McCarthy. McConnell refused to participate in a joint investigation at all.Isn't McConnell a senator?
You had the impeachment. One was enough.Yup...my bad. McCarthy. McConnell refused to participate in a joint investigation at all.
So Durham, three years in, has produced one guilty plea for removing a sentence from an email....and lost a case of a lawyer lying to the FBI....and you think his is legit...You really can't tell the difference between a kangaroo court disguised as a politicized hearing and legitimate investigations? How about executive privilege? Does that seem necessary to you?
Not by a long shot. Trump stayed in office because of the partisanship of the republicans in the senate. Not because there wasn't a reason to convict. Add to that the actual conviction in the senate only carried the threat of removal from office. It would not have been a criminal trial.You had the impeachment. One was enough.